User Profile: Jaymthegenius

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Jaymthegenius
Member since Aug-19-04 · Last seen Aug-03-05

I usually play chess on Yahoo!(rated around 1550-1800, no prog protection may have something to do with it) and chess21. (anywhere from 2200-2350, trying to break 2400, is tough, though) Here are some of my games from both sites, and here is a rundown on my style from a scale to 1-10
Tactical(white)7
tactical(black)8
Possitional(white)4
Possitional(black)3
defense(white)4
defense(black)4
Attack(white)6
attack(black)7
Next is a skill evaluation:
minor piece endgames:5 (intermediate level)
rook and pawn endgames:7
Queen and pawn endgames:6 (I have updated as I've played ONE on Yahoo! and solved a few Queen and pawn endings on Fritz teqnique trainer and Right Decisions by Chessbase)
Here are some of my games from both sites
A game I've played with a beutiful combination, was the Van Geet [Event "CHESS.AC Game"]
[Date "2005.05.03"]
[Round "-"]
[White "jaymthegenius 1654"]
[Black "johnkeough 1513"]
[Result "*"]
1. Nb1-c3 g7-g6 (clearly he is fishing for a pirc/modern, better to avoid those lines) 2. h2-h4!? (unconventional, but best according to Don Maddox) Bf8-g7 3. h4-h5 g6-g5 4. d2-d4 d7-d6 (what happened to 4...e6?) 5. e2-e4 (taking the pawn at g5 is inferior, as 5...f6 6.Bh4 gives black chances) (or h6,Bh4) h7-h6 6. Ng1-f3 Bc8-g4 7. Bf1-c4 c7-c5? (this pawn thrust isnt good, I win two pawns and black has little compensation) 8. d4xc5 Nb8-c6 9. c5xd6 Bg7-f6 10. Nc3-b5 e7xd6 11. Qd1-d5 Bf6-e7 (Black moves around his bishop and pawn's too much) 12. Qd5xf7+ (attacking the weakness in black's camp, all moves from here are combonation preperations) Ke8-d7 13. Bc1-e3 Ng8-f6 14. O-O-O Rh8-f8 15. Bc4-e6+! (this move set's the combonation in motion) Bg4xe6 16. Rd1xd6+
and Black is sunk, it is funny how black play's seemingly sensible moves but these ignore development while creating weaknesses, allowing my combonational skills to be
here is one as black vs, the enlish
Opening:Kings english
[Event "Chess21"]
[Site "www.chess21.com"]
[Date "08-feb-2005 20:10:02"]
[White "kingsberri"]
[Black "jaymthegenius"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "2157"]
[BlackElo "2232"]
[TimeControl "10/0"]
1. c2-c4 e7-e5 2. Nb1-c3 c7-c5 3. Ng1-f3 Ng8-f6 4. Nf3xe5 Nb8-c6 5. Ne5xc6 d7xc6 6. d2-d3 Bf8-e7 7. Bc1-f4 Be7-d6 8. Qd1-d2 0-0 9. g2-g3 Bd6xf4 10. Qd2xf4 Qd8-d4 11. Qf4xd4 c5xd4 12. Nc3-e4 Nf6xe4 13. d3xe4 c6-c5 14. b2-b3 b7-b6 15. h2-h4 Bc8-b7 16. f2-f3 f7-f5 17. e4xf5 Rf8xf5 18. Bf1-g2 Ra8-e8 19. Ke1-f2 Rf5-e5 20. Rh1-e1 Re5-e3 21. Ra1-d1 Re8-f8 22. Rd1-d3 Bb7xf3 23. Bg2xf3 Rf8xf3 24. e2xf3 Re3xd3 25. Re1-e2 Kg8-f7 26. g3-g4 Rd3-d1 27. Re2-e1 Rd1xe1 28. Kf2xe1 Kf7-f6 29. f3-f4 h7-h5 30. g4xh5 Kf6-f5 31. Ke1-d2 Kf5xf4 32. Kd2-d3 Kf4-g4 33. a2-a3 Kg4xh5 34. b3-b4 Kh5xh4 35. a3-a4 c5xb4 36. Kd3xd4 g7-g5 0-1

This long notation is very annoying, I prefer short Algebraic, but perhaps is better if I can set up a position from a designated point at an analysis.

Jaymthegenius has kibitzed 472 times to chessgames [less...]

May-05-05 Kibitzer's Café

Jaymthegenius: And I play various gambit's in blitz play as white (Kings gambit, Wing, etc)

May-05-05 Gioachino Greco

Jaymthegenius: O.K! I meant just Reti! But both are the best opening inventor's who ever lived! And who's theories are the most important in the history of chess! As using piece and flank pressure to contol the center is the best way to do it.

May-04-05 J Joguet vs J Walid, 1992

Jaymthegenius: And wasnt there a quote from the 1500's "Chesse, it is supposed to be a game of logic, but he who playes the kings bishop pawn on the second move at the kings pawn game contradict's such a rule, weakening the kings diagonal, allowing a knight sacrifice!" It was quoted in ...

May-03-05 Greco vs NN, 1620

Jaymthegenius: azaris: 3. c4 is just rubbish, what is White going to do about his d-pawn? I also don't like dxe5 after Black plays d5, White shouldn't open things up when he hasn't developed properly yet. The only hope is that Black gets "creative" with the queen and loses time in the ...

May-03-05 NN vs Greco, 1625

Jaymthegenius: Actually, not 4...d6, 4...Bc5 and I mean 3.Bc4

May-02-05 Anderssen vs Morphy, 1858

Jaymthegenius: Because I have this CD "modern Way's of playing the sicilian" That give 1.e4,c5 2..Nf3,e6 3.d4,cxd4 4.Nxd4,Qb6?! 5.Nc3,Bc5 and reverse with a pawn at a3 and move in hand would be quite usefull!

May-02-05 Greco vs NN, 1620

Jaymthegenius: yes, it could have, for instance 1.d4,g6 2.e4,Bg7 3.Be3,b6 4.c4,Bb7 5.Nc3,Nc6 6.f4,Nf4 7.Nf3,0-0 8.Bd3,e6 For an example (I know I gave a poor move order, just an example of a transposition) Also, NN was slightly better, with 9.e5,Ng4 the bishop's get chased.

Apr-30-05 Anderssen vs Morphy, 1858

Jaymthegenius: What about 1.a3,Nf6 This is my choice as black.

Apr-30-05 Anderssen vs Dufresne, 1851

Jaymthegenius: Kosteniuk would easily defeat Anderssen, black played a nice game until the blunder.

Apr-30-05 Anderssen vs Harrwitz, 1848

Jaymthegenius: Aha! I've found them! I quoted this game to Schiller, (Isnt this a Terrasch, I am playing against Schiller's mainline Terrasch).

Apr-29-05 Eric Schiller

Apr-28-05 Zhu Chen vs Kosteniuk, 2001

Apr-27-05 G J Ludden vs Kosteniuk, 2000

Apr-23-05 Portisch vs Petrosian, 1967

Apr-21-05 Alexandra Kosteniuk

Apr-19-05 W Paulsen vs F Riemann, 1880
Apr-16-05 Polgar vs F Berkes, 2003

Apr-15-05 Spassky vs Karpov, 1982

Apr-14-05 Benavides vs G Saduleto, 1590

Apr-14-05 Ruy Lopez vs G da Cutri, 1560

Apr-12-05 Napoleon Bonaparte vs Madame De Remusat, 1804

Apr-11-05 Bogoljubov vs Tartakower, 1936

Apr-10-05 Alekhine vs A A Surber, 1933

Apr-06-05 Kasparov vs Kramnik, 1996

Apr-05-05 Nimzowitsch vs Systemsson, 1927

Apr-05-05 A Smith vs Philidor, 1790

Apr-03-05 T Helin vs J Kiltti, 1996

Apr-02-05 NN vs Greco, 1620

Apr-02-05 Greco vs NN, 1620

Mar-19-05 E Schiller vs J Jacobs, 1971

Mar-18-05 W Schiller vs P Leisebein, 1988

Mar-16-05 Reti vs Marshall, 1925

Mar-16-05 Castellvi vs Vinyoles, 1475

Mar-08-05 Greco vs NN, 1620

Mar-08-05 Ruy Lopez vs G da Cutri, 1560

Mar-07-05 Greco vs NN, 1620

Mar-06-05 A Mengarini vs E Schiller, 1980

Mar-06-05 NN vs Greco, 1620

Mar-04-05 Philidor vs NN, 1749

Mar-04-05 E Schiller vs Reth, 1978

Mar-04-05 J Bruehl vs Philidor, 1783

Mar-02-05 Reti vs Bogoljubov, 1924

Mar-01-05 Shredder (Computer)

Feb-28-05 NN vs Greco, 1620

Feb-28-05 Greco vs NN, 1620

Feb-28-05 Morphy vs Bird, 1859

Feb-28-05 Larsen vs Deep Blue, 1993

Feb-24-05 S Urusov vs Bihn, 1851

Feb-24-05 Deep Blue vs Polgar, 1993

Feb-22-05 Shredder vs Hydra, 2004

Feb-21-05 Greco vs NN, 1620

Feb-15-05 L Darling vs R Wood, 1983

Feb-14-05 Richard Reti

Feb-14-05 Greco vs NN, 1623

Feb-07-05 Greco vs NN, 1620

Feb-04-05 Philidor vs NN, 1790

Feb-04-05 W Napier vs Marshall, 1896

Jan-31-05 Greco vs NN, 1620

Jan-31-05 K G Shirazi vs J Peters, 1984

Jan-28-05 Kasparov vs Deep Thought, 1989

Jan-28-05 Englisch vs Blackburne, 1883

Jan-28-05 NN vs Greco, 1620

Jan-28-05 Greco vs NN, 1620

Jan-20-05 Greco vs NN, 1620

Jan-18-05 Polgar vs Karpov, 1993

Jan-17-05 Chessmaster vs Shabalov, 1994

Jan-08-05 Greco vs NN, 1620

Jan-07-05 Ljubojevic vs Kasparov, 1987

Jan-07-05 Staunton vs Horwitz, 1851

Jan-06-05 Staunton vs Saint-Amant, 1843

Jan-06-05 Cochrane vs Staunton, 1842

Jan-06-05 Larsen vs Deep Blue, 1993

Dec-29-04 Reti vs Duras, 1912

Dec-28-04 Dragon RUS vs Timoscenko, 1997

Dec-28-04 Petrosian vs Karpov, 1971

Dec-23-04 Deep Blue (Computer)

Dec-14-04 Greco vs NN, 1620

Dec-13-04 Sheldon vs Philidor, 1790

Dec-03-04 Reti vs Stoltz, 1928
Dec-03-04 Reti vs Nimzowitsch, 1928

Dec-03-04 G Atwood vs Philidor, 1794

Dec-03-04 Greco vs NN, 1620

Nov-20-04 Greco vs NN, 1620

Nov-19-04 Greco vs NN, 1620

Nov-19-04 Philidor vs NN, 1790

Nov-19-04 NN vs Greco, 1620

Nov-19-04 Greco vs NN, 1620

Nov-18-04 Polerio vs Busnardo, 1590

Nov-10-04 Greco vs NN, 1620

Nov-09-04 Busnardo vs NN, 1590

Oct-19-04 Mephisto vs NN, 1879

Oct-19-04 NN vs Greco, 1620

indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.