chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile

Fezzik
Member since Nov-04-02 · Last seen Jan-19-20
no bio

   Fezzik has kibitzed 870 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-08-19 Steinitz vs Kolisch, 1867
 
Fezzik: For the record, 38.Bh5 was losing just as badly as 38.Bb3, but 38.Bb3 allowed a clear mate while Bh5 was just clearly losing. I don't think a human would give 38.Bb3 a "?" in the given position. The opening was at best dubious for White, but Black didn't take full advantage until the
 
   Feb-16-13 J Gallagher vs Le Quang Liem, 2013
 
Fezzik: Wow, what a game!
 
   Jan-19-13 Borislav Ivanov (replies)
 
Fezzik: The computer match up rate is the equivalent of DNA evidence. Is it enough by itself to prove that someone is guilty in a criminal case? Probably not. Is it enough in a civil case where the burden of proof is simply "preponderance of the evidence" yes. Same here. Borislav Ivanov ...
 
   Feb-14-12 Anand vs Aronian, 2006
 
Fezzik: Both players missed 15.Nxc7!!, but 15.Ne3 was sufficient. Of course, since this was a blindfold game, Anand could be excused for not playing such a tactical line in case Aronian had some surprise up his sleeve.
 
   Dec-14-11 Van der Wiel vs H Olafsson, 1991 (replies)
 
Fezzik: What's really surprising is that in the final position there's only one move that clearly wins. Congrats to Van der Weil for finding the only move!
 
   Nov-25-11 Tal vs A Vooremaa, 1979 (replies)
 
Fezzik: I remembered the right move rather than discovered it. But looking at the position, I wonder if I would have had Tal's courage to sac the Q in this way. It may not be a completely sound sacrifice, but to play someone with that sort of tactical vision would be terrifying!
 
   Oct-29-11 Robson vs B Finegold, 2011 (replies)
 
Fezzik: Btw, if the puzzle had been after White's 27th move, it would have been a "Very difficult" puzzle worthy of today's rating!
 
   Oct-18-11 Naiditsch vs Kramnik, 2009 (replies)
 
Fezzik: 21.Nd4 Rh4 22.Be3 would have been far more resilient. Black may have had an advantage, but proving it would have been difficult even for Kramnik.
 
   Oct-16-11 Pillsbury vs Tarrasch, 1895 (replies)
 
Fezzik: This is a classic combination by Pillsbury! Thanks to chessgames.com for helping us to remember it. Even though I remembered that White played Qg3 at some point, I couldn't quite piece it all together. Tal once wrote that Russian schoolboys, by the time they are 11, know how to ...
 
   Oct-03-11 T Lanchava vs M Kursova, 2007 (replies)
 
Fezzik: At first I was surprised that Black, a +2300 player, would continue after 40.Qe3. But then I noticed the move number. The two players were almost certainly in time trouble when this position arose.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC