chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile

Doug4Chess
Member since Jan-09-09 · Last seen Sep-12-18
no bio
>> Click here to see Doug4Chess's game collections.

   Doug4Chess has kibitzed 15 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Sep-12-18 Carlsen vs Karpov, 2009 (replies)
 
Doug4Chess: If Carlsen had played 48. Qg6+, it would have cost Karpov his queen, and he likely would have resigned in disgust. As another kibitzer has already noted, Carlsen should have played 55. Qc8+. Karpov would then have to play 55...Kb6 or b5, followed by 56. Qxc5+, costing the loss of
 
   Sep-12-18 J Polgar vs Naiditsch, 2009 (replies)
 
Doug4Chess: It's easy for me to play through these games, and be critical of some of the moves these elite players make. I have nothing to lose, and I'm not under any time constraints. Having said that, I'll get to the point. On her 27th move, Polgar plays c5. Naiditsch responds with ...
 
   Aug-10-18 Caruana vs Nakamura, 2017
 
Doug4Chess: This game came to an end after Caruana's 37th move: Rxf6. I don't know if Nakamura resigned or ran out of time, but Caruana is credited with winning the game. I wish to draw attention to white's 32nd move: Caruana moved his rook at a1 to g1. With that move, he had three pieces on
 
   Aug-01-18 Anand vs Caruana, 2018 (replies)
 
Doug4Chess: When it comes to chess, I'm a patzer. Nonetheless, I humbly submit that Caruana, on his 45th move, blew a golden opportunity to turn the tables on Anand (who was a piece up), and go on and win the game. Anand's 45th move, Nd3, appears to be an excellent one: besides protecting ...
 
   Apr-16-10 Kramnik vs V Gashimov, 2010 (replies)
 
Doug4Chess: After Kramnik's 51. Kh1, couldn't Gashimov have secured a draw by repeatedly checking at f1 and f2? Sure looks like it to me.
 
   Feb-23-10 Shirov vs Smeets, 2010 (replies)
 
Doug4Chess: Shams: Yes, you're pretty much correct. Several hours after making the 02/22/10 posting, I took a second look at the board after 36. Ng6+, and realized how mistaken my analysis had been.
 
   Jan-21-10 Carlsen vs Nakamura, 2009 (replies)
 
Doug4Chess: I'm wondering why in the world Nakamura played 52. ...Nd4 when 52. ...Qg1 would have won the game outright with a checkmate.
 
   Jan-05-10 Svidler vs Dominguez Perez, 2009 (replies)
 
Doug4Chess: I wonder why black didn't play 60....Bc3, which should have allowed him to queen the pawn on b3, and with a queen, he could have harassed white's king numerous times.
 
   Dec-21-09 J Polgar vs Morozevich, 2009 (replies)
 
Doug4Chess: I'm inclined to agree that "e1=B" is likely an error in the game record, and that Morozevich actually promoted to a Queen. Interestingly, if he'd played 45. ...f5+ instead of 45....e1=B or =Q, he could have had a quick forced mate: 46. Kh5...Qh3, checkmate; or 46. Kh4....Bf6+ 47.
 
   Nov-11-09 I Chirila vs C Li, 2009 (replies)
 
Doug4Chess: How in the world did black win this game!?
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC