chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Levon Aronian vs Hikaru Nakamura
Gibraltar Masters (2018), La Caleta GIB, rd 10, Feb-01
Pirc Defense: Classical Variation. Two Knights System (B08)  ·  1/2-1/2

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
1/2-1/2

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 151 more Aronian/Nakamura games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Olga is our default viewer, but we offer other choices as well. You can use a different viewer by selecting it from the pulldown menu below and pressing the "Set" button.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-02-18  znsprdx: HELP
Aronian had 6x the time 25. to move
Speculation has it that he wanted to play MVL in tie breaks - maybe to show his dominance ?? Was the rook sac just diplomatic handshake to Naka - saying nice try but no trophy this time. Too bad the 3 of them played in London without tie offers - this Tournament wasn't for SGM's
Feb-02-18  lost in space: Probably a miscalculation, missing the safe for Black
Feb-02-18  lost in space: Position after 28...Kh7:


click for larger view

I guess whites’s plan was to play 29. Re3 and 30. Rh3#, but this doesn’t work:

29. Re3? Ra1+ 30. Kf2 Qxb2+ 31. Ne2 Qg7!! and no mate. Black wins.

So the Rep was to avoid a loss after a miscalculation (Rxh5)

Feb-02-18  ChessHigherCat: <lost in space: I guess whites’s plan was to play 29. Re3 and 30. Rh3#, but this doesn’t work: 29. Re3? Ra1+ 30. Kf2 Qxb2+ 31. Ne2 Qg7!! and no mate> I'm not sure whether this line works either but at least it prevents 31. Qg7:

31. Re2 Qc1 32. Nf3 Qh6 ( 32...Qf1+ 33. Kg3 Qxe2?? 34. Ng5+! Kg7 35. Qxe2) 33. Ng5+ Kh8 34. h4 Rg8?? 39. Kxg7)

Instead of winning the queen with Ng5+, white also has an interesting double check with Ne6+, but I haven't analyzed it out. Of course black isn't stupid enough to play Rg8 but White is still a pawn up and seems to have attacking potential while black's attack has kind of fizzled out.

Feb-03-18  Ulhumbrus: Suppose that instead of 16 Bxb5 White tries 16 Nc6. On 16...Bxc6 17 dxc6 Qb6+ 18 Kh1 Qxc6 19 Bf3 d5 20 Nxd5 looks promising.
Feb-03-18  lost in space: <<ChessHigherCat:> <lost in space: I guess whites’s plan was to play 29. Re3 and 30. Rh3#, but this doesn’t work: 29. Re3? Ra1+ 30. Kf2 Qxb2+ 31. Ne2 Qg7!! and no mate> I'm not sure whether this line works either but at least it prevents 31. Qg7: 31. Re2 Qc1 32. Nf3 Qh6 ( 32...Qf1+ 33. Kg3 Qxe2?? 34. Ng5+! Kg7 35. Qxe2) 33. Ng5+ Kh8 34. h4 Rg8?? 39. Kxg7)>

I think also after 31 Re2 Qc1 32. Nf3 Qf1+ 33. Kg3


click for larger view

Black is winning after 33...Rg8! 34. Ng5+ Rxg5 35. Qxg5 Ra3+ 36. Re3 Qg2+ 37. Kh4 Qh2+ 38. Kg4 Qg2+ 39. Kh4 Qxg5+ 40. Kxg5 Rxe3


click for larger view

0-1

So this line does not work for white.

Feb-03-18  ChessHigherCat: <Lost in Space> Good point, so I guess Aronian really must have "blundered" there
Feb-03-18  lost in space: Yeps, and I think he planed 29. Re3 and mate and found after his Rook sac that the line is not working. Instead of losing he decided to make a draw by repetition.
Feb-03-18  Ulhumbrus: <ChessHigherCat:> <lost in space: I guess whites’s plan was to play 29. Re3 and 30. Rh3#, but this doesn’t work: 29. Re3? Ra1+ 30. Kf2 Qxb2+ 31. Ne2 Qg7!! and no mate> let us try a slight adjustment to this: 29 f6 gxf6 and only now 30 Re3:30...Ra1+ 31 Kf2 Qxb2+ 32 Ne2 and now Black's pawn on f6 obstructs the way back to g7 for Black's queen.
Feb-04-18  ChessHigherCat: <Ulhumbrus> Brilliant! (my only criticism is that there's no more g pawn at this point, so you meant 29. f6 exf6, right?) I wonder why Aronian didn't do it then? The only reason I can think of is that maybe black has better alternatives than Ra1+, etc. After 29. f6, exf6 is certainly forced because of the mating threat on g7 and if 29. Rg8??? Qh5#.
Feb-04-18  JPi: <ChessHigherCat><Ulhumbrus> Clever, however I doubt players as Aronian and Nakamura missed such combination. What about 29.f6 exf6 30.Re3 Ra1+ 31.Kf2 Qxb2+ 32.Ne2 Qb6 and White still can't use his Rook for the mate.
Feb-04-18  ChessHigherCat: <JPi> On t'a demandé ton avis peut-être? Just kidding, that's true. I was looking at Nd4 but it just leads to a perpetual: 33. Nd4 Ra2+ 34. Ne2 because if 34. Kg3?? Rxg2!
Feb-04-18  JPi: Pas de problème <ChessHigherCat> je suis désormais � un age qui ne prend pas la mouche facilement.
Feb-04-18  ChessHigherCat: <JPi> <Pas de problème je suis désormais à un age qui ne prend pas la mouche facilement.>

Cela tombe bien parce que je ne peux m'empêcher de faire un autre mauvais jeu d'esprit: La vieille grenouille ne prend plus les mouches si facilement? (il faut m'excuser, je suis gravement malade ;-)

Feb-05-18  Ulhumbrus: <ChessHigherCat: <Ulhumbrus> Brilliant! (my only criticism is that there's no more g pawn at this point, so you meant 29. f6 exf6, right?) I wonder why Aronian didn't do it then? The only reason I can think of is that maybe black has better alternatives than Ra1+, etc. After 29. f6, exf6 is certainly forced because of the mating threat on g7 and if 29. Rg8??? Qh5#.> Yes, I did mean 29...exf6

< JPi: <ChessHigherCat><Ulhumbrus> Clever, however I doubt players as Aronian and Nakamura missed such combination. What about 29.f6 exf6 30.Re3 Ra1+ 31.Kf2 Qxb2+ 32.Ne2 Qb6 and White still can't use his Rook for the mate.> How about a second adjustment: On 29 f6 exf6 first 30 c5 Qxc5 and now 31 Re3 Ra1+ 32 Kf2 and Black can't play 32...Qc2+

Feb-05-18  ChessHigherCat: <JPi> On demande ton avis!: <Ulhumbrus: How about a second adjustment: On 29 f6 exf6 first 30 c5 Qxc5 and now 31 Re3 Ra1+ 32 Kf2 and Black can't play 32...Qc2+>
Feb-05-18  JPi: <Ulhumbrus> On 30.c5 Why not 30...Qxb2. <ChessHigherCat> I hope you will soon recover. Having a sense of humor helps to maintain good health.
Feb-05-18  ChessHigherCat: <JPi> Je voulais dire que je suis un malade mental, c.à.d. fou, mais c'était encore une blague. Les blagues en ligne souvent se perdent or se prennent au sérieux malheureusement.
Feb-05-18  Ulhumbrus: <JPi: <Ulhumbrus> On 30.c5 Why not 30...Qxb2.> Then one possibility is the zwischenzug 31 c6 before doing anything else
Feb-05-18  JPi: <Ulhumbrus> on 31.c6 Ra1 is an easy way to force the draw. In fact even on 30...Qxc5 31.Re3 Qc1+ 32.Kf2 Qxb2+ 33.Ne2 Qb6 White has to go for the perpetual check. Rook is a lot indeed. I don't know if Aronian did this sacrifice on purpose of a draw just to play his friend Maxime on tie break. Or did he confuse himself on aesthetic mirage attack by Rxh5? I don't know. These Chess artists have another common meaning.
Feb-05-18  JPi: <ChessHigherCat> La folie véritable n'est-elle pas celle qui s'ignore ? Vous savoir avec le sens de l'humour et la sant� qui l'accompagne est la bonne nouvelle de ce jour.
Feb-15-18  Ulhumbrus: One alternative to 14 a4 is 14 Bf3 supporting the invasion Nc6.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC