Hao Wang vs Daniel Fridman (2013)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Hao Wang vs Daniel Fridman
Dortmund Sparkassen (2013), Dortmund GER, rd 2, Jul-27
Russian Game: Nimzowitsch Attack (C42) · 1-0

White to move.

ANALYSIS [x]

1-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1

FEN COPIED

explore this opening	find similar games	1,825 more games of Fridman
	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Jul-27-13		notyetagm: Wang Hao vs D Fridman, 2013 48 ? click for larger view 48 ♗d3-f5! 1-0 <<obstruction: e5->h8> click for larger view Wang Hao's excellent <OBSTRUCTION> shot 48 ♗d3-f5! 1-0 wins the game instantly by <PREVENTING> Black from <LINE-OPENING> the critical e5->h8 diagonal in order for the Black e5-bishop to <GAIN CONTROL OVER THE PROMOTION SQUARE> the h8-sq of the White h6-passer.

Jul-27-13		Doniez: Yes, your analisys is correct but I can't see no defence after 47.fxe6 . If 47...f5 to open tthe long black diagonal, then immediately 48.Kxc3 and Black looses his Bishop. So it seems that after move 47 Fridman had NO chances to open the a1 h8 diagonal, letting White h pawn queening. Is there any other possible defence for Black that I can't see?

Jul-27-13		Calar: <Doniez> No, there isn't. Black was however lost some moves earlier, seeing as how last few moves are literally forced.

Jul-27-13		Doniez: Ok <Calar> , I really enjoyed this match of Wang Hao and he needed a win after the last performance not at his usual levels...

Jul-27-13		notyetagm: <Calar: <Doniez> No, there isn't. Black was however lost some moves earlier, seeing as how last few moves are literally forced.> Yes, Black was lost before 48 ♗d3-f5! 1-0. I just annotated it because it is a very simple and crystal-clear example of the <OBSTRUCTION> theme. A good example to learn from and what to look for in your own games. :-)

Jul-27-13		Doniez: <notyetagm> For sure I will use the tactical theme of "obstruction" in my games and your comments are always very clear and full of good ideas, especially for patzers like me

Jul-27-13		notyetagm: <Doniez: <notyetagm> For sure I will use the tactical theme of "obstruction" in my games and your comments are always very clear and full of good ideas, especially for patzers like me> That's why I do this, for <INSTRUCTIVE> value. <perfidious> seems to think that I do this for some evil reason, that I enjoy watching players blunder and lose. In fact, I do enjoy watching players blunder and lose because it gives me great examples to learn from so I do not make the same mistake in my games. :-) For example, who will forget about leaving their rooks <UNPROTECTED> with queens on the board after seeing Wang Hao's horrendous <BLUNDER> 25 ... ♖b2-a2?? yesterday?

Jul-27-13		WannaBe: We all learn from blunders, or a lesser extent, errors, whether on board, or in life.

Jul-27-13		notyetagm: <WannaBe: We all learn from blunders, or a lesser extent, errors, whether on board, or in life.> Yes, it's the smart person who learns from the <BLUNDERS> of others, not by learning from his own failures.

Jul-29-13		Ulhumbrus: Instead of 26...f6 it is better for Black to weaken himself on the black squares by 26...g6 because White has no dark squared bishop and the white king's bishop is obstructed by Black's pawns

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.