chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Maxime Vachier-Lagrave vs Nikita Vitiugov
Alekhine Memorial (2013), Paris/St Petersburg FRA/RUS, rd 8, Apr-30
Caro-Kann Defense: Advance. Tal Variation (B12)  ·  0-1

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
0-1

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 12 more Vachier-Lagrave/Vitiugov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-27-14  diagonalley: <Madman99X> ... ditto... my path exactly!
May-27-14  Cheapo by the Dozen: The plan

48 ... Qg3
49 ... Nf2#

forces White to sac his queen to avoid immediate mate. The only other thing to calculate is whether he can get a queen right back, and he can't:

48 .. Qg3
49 Qxd3 Qxd3
50 ba/b6 Kc7/Qh7+

May-27-14  Coriolis: Quite subtle for a Btuesday.
May-27-14  Coriolis: A quiet move loud enough to make the opponent resign.
May-27-14  morfishine: <48...Qg3> threatens 49...Nf2# forcing White to surrender his Queen

(1) 49.Bg2 Nf2+ 50.Kg1 Qxa3 51.Kxf2 Qxa4

(2) 49.Qa2 Nf2+ 50.Qxf2 Qxf2 51.bxa6 Qe1+
52.Kg2 Qa5

Very nice clearance of <f2> for the Knight

*****

May-27-14  patzer2: Today's 48...Qg3! solution initiates a mate threat (e.g. 49. bxa6 Nf2#) which forces surrender of decisive material (i.e. White Queen) to delay mate (e.g. 49. Qxd3+ Qxd3 ) .

The immediate combination began a move earlier with 47...Qxf2+. However, as other posters have noted, White's game was lost long before. Perhaps 31. Qe2 = or 31. Qd1 = would've held.

P.S.: Took me longer than usual to solve this "easy" Tuesday puzzle because the forcing move 48...Qg3! wasn't initiated by a check or capture.

May-27-14  therevolver17: 48..Qg3 (threatening 49...Nf2#) 49.Qxd3 Qxd3
May-27-14  goodevans: <48..Qg3>

Full marks only if you spot that white can stop the mate with <49.Bg2> but that this loses the ♕ to <49...Nf2+ 50.Kg1 Qxa3>.

(I got full marks!)

May-27-14  awfulhangover: Palmface day! I chased the king around,but found nothing. After toooo long time I saw the quiet Qg3. Not impressed by myself.
May-27-14  patzer2: <goodevans> Not that Black needs the extra material for this easy win, but 48...Qg3 49.Bg2 Nf2+ 50.Kg1 Nh3+ 51. Kh1 Qxa3 saves the knight which slightly improves over 50...Qxa3 51. Kxf2 .
May-27-14  Nick46: I puzzled over this for quite a while until a spam phonecall shook me out of my stupor; then, heypresto!
May-27-14  sombreronegro: The king can't move but the queen occupies f2 which would otherwise be clear for a lethal knight. g3 does the same job vacating the spot for the knight. Sort of astonishing at first glance that white has nothing but spite checks. So the immediate g3.
May-27-14  kevin86: An easy one. black now threatens mate and that possible mate also has a discovered attack on the white queen. White can prevent mate only at the loss of queen for knight.
May-27-14  BOSTER: < PB: The idea is easy to see>. So, why the great French man, and I'm not talking about myself, didn't see it.
May-27-14  sombreronegro:

Doubled pawns encouraged on squares opposite the bishop....

Lot of compensation for that wreck of a king side pawn structure. Look also how the quick domination of the d file encourages white to liquidate the rooks. With the queens on the board and the quick liquidation of the rooks the doubled pawns are not a liability. So not only does the f4 pawn clamp down on white leaving the h pawn undefended, it also helps keep the f6 pawn giving the knight the e5 outpost. The knight is just the better piece. By move 30 or so the bishop does not have a useful thing to do. A frustrating position for white. What a difference from a rook and pawn ending.

May-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  gawain: Although there are only a few pieces on the board, this was challenging. Eventually I found the quiet solution. Nice.
May-27-14  PJs Studio: I found this tougher because it is a puzzle. I Starting searching for checks where I could shield the queen with the knight as to force a discovered CHECK with the knight. But this works as nicely (because the queen must be sac'ed for the knight to avoid mate the mate at f2.)
May-27-14  Pedro Fernandez: This puzzle should be qualified as ``Very Easy''. 1-3 min. is sufficient for an average amateur chess player. Instantaneous-a few seconds for chess masters and strong chess machines.
May-27-14  1d410: O.K. I have an idea, why doesn't white take the knight with his queen, he loses the queen, and then bxa6 and promotes, with the pawn protected by another pawn and the bishop. (shouldn't have deleted the old post.)
May-27-14  Refused: Because the pawn is going nowhere.
I play Kc7 as black and intercept/block the pawn in time.

I you meant Bxa6, then Qe4+ and Qxa4 stops that nonsense.

Bottom line is, Black can always stop the pawn with his king, and the Queen and two extra passed pawns make short work of the white king.

May-27-14  1d410: Thanks I'm just a beginner
May-27-14  Checker2: I hate missing a Btuesday - btoo subtle for me. (Thanks for the chuckle Coriolis) Strange because it really is quite simple, and I saw the loose queen idea with discovered check(mate, so moot) with Qh4+ Kg1 Qg3+ Kh1 Nf2#, but didn't work because of 49 Kg2. I also realized it was good the king was pinned in the corner and I examined Qf1+, and gave up after looking also at several moves of the knibt.
May-27-14  TheBish: M Vachier-Lagrave vs N Vitiugov, 2013

Black to play (48...?) "Easy"

Black wins by threatening mate with 48...Qg3! when 49...Nf2+ will be a killer, e.g. 49. Bg2 Nf2+ 50. Kg1 Qxa3 or 49. Qa2 Nf2+ 50. Qxf2 Qxf2 51. bxa6 c4.

May-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  PawnSac: < BOSTER: < PB: The idea is easy to see>. So, why the great French man, and I'm not talking about myself, didn't see it. >

He probably did, but the position was already lost and his only hope (other than RESIGN) was that V might overlook it and then blunder.

This was a very unpleasant game for MVL, because black got the better play right out of the opening. White did not play the best line (better in this opening is Chessgames.com world team vs Akobian). By move 16 black already had the initiative, and tho white tried to simplify to relieve the pressure, by move 31 black had solved all his problems, and was up a pawn with promising chances in the ensuing endgame (3-2 queenside majority with centrally located knight, and better placed king. For the next half dozen moves white poked around looking to find complications in a queen ending, or chances for a repetition, but by move 38 it was clear that blacks chances were continuing to improve and white's position was all the more problematic. He was most likely already lost, tho he played on for another 10 moves. After 40.Qe1? Qd3! it was clear that black would take control of every bit of space white gave up. It then seemed the only hope for white is an outright blunder on blacks part. The last straw was 41.Be2? (who knows, apparently white was trying to remove knight squares and gave no consideration that after ...Qc2, Qd1+ was not available as a defense because of the weakness of his B pawn after Nd3. It's hard to say, but any way you look at it, there were not many good moves available for white. Very difficult.) In any event, black's king was moving into prime position and with his Q deep into white's q-side, and with white's king so far out of play, I don't think anyone would have criticized MVL for resigning at that point.

May-27-14  BOSTER: <PawnSac>.
Thanks for explanation.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC