William Crane vs Henry Charlick (1888)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

William Crane vs Henry Charlick
2nd Australian Championship, Melbourne (1888), Melbourne AUS, rd 8, Oct-24
Center Game: Paulsen Attack Variation (C22) · 1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening	find similar games	5 more W Crane/H Charlick games
	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Jul-26-13		optimal play: <<<<<<THE CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP.> [BY TELEGRAPH.]> (FROM OUR CORRESPONDENT.)> MELBOURNE, WEDNESDAY.> At the Centennial Chess Congress, to-day, Charlick and Crane met. The Sydney player opened with the centre gambit and soon established a strong attack, but failed at a critical juncture to make the winning move. The game merged into a drawn position. These players, therefore, tie for first prize, with scores of 6 out of a possible 7. They now play off for the championship, till one wins two games. Tullidge takes third prize with a score of 5½, and Brocklebank fourth with 4 games.> - The Sydney Morning Herald (NSW) issue Thursday 25 October 1888>

Jul-26-13		optimal play: <<<<<<THE CENTENNIAL CHESS CONGRESS.> THE MAJOR TOURNEY.> The second game between Mr. Crane and Mr. Charlick was played yesterday morning. Mr. Crane, who had the move, adopted the Centre Gambit, with the result that he soon succeeded in advancing a pawn to a threatening position, and Mr. Charlick was thrown on the defensive. The South Australian champion, however, was quite equal to the occasion, and after a short but sharp engagement, in the course of which all the major pieces were removed from the board, it was found at Mr. Crane's 25th move that the positions were so equal as to justify the players in agreeing to a draw, which, in accordance with the conditions of the tourney, is reckoned as half a point to each of them.> Time - Mr. Crane, 1 hour 38 minutes ; Mr. Charlick, 1 hour 13 minutes> The following table shows the score as settled after yesterday's drawn game:- William Crane (1-1-½-1-1-1-½) [+5 =2 -0] (6.0 / 7) =1st Henry Charlick (1-1-½-½-1-1-1) [+5 =2 -0] (6.0 / 7) =1st William Tullidge (0-1-1-1-1-1-½) [+5 =1 -1] (5.5 / 7) 3rd Charles Brocklebank (0-1-0-1-1-1-0) [+4 =0 -3] (4.0 / 7) 4th John Shaw Stanley (1-0-1-½-0-0-1) [+3 =1 -3] (3.5 / 7) 5th Phillip Lampe (1-0-1-0-0-0-0) [+2 =0 -5] (2.0 / 7) 6th James Higgs (0-0-0-0-0-0-1) [+1 =0 -6] (1.0 / 7) 7th David Hay (0-0-0-0-0-0-0) [+0 =0 -7] (0.0 / 7) 8th Thus the result of the major tourney is that Mr. Charlick and Mr. Crane tie for first and second places, with 5 wins each and 2 draws ; that Mr. Tullidge is third, with 5 wins 1 draw and 1 loss ; and that Mr. Brocklebank is fourth, with 4 wins and 3 losses. Of the remaining players, Mr. Stanley is the only one who has made any record at all against the winners of the four prizes, and as the value of that record is only half a point, it seems doubtful whether he has a sufficient claim to the consolation prize to which some reference was made in the programme prepared by the executive committee of the congress. As to the tie between Mr. Crane and Mr. Charlick, the conditions of the play-off for the championship of Australasia are that it shall go to the player who shall first score two wins, draws not counting.> - The Argus (Melbourne, Vic.) issue Thursday 25 October 1888>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.