chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Viswanathan Anand vs Rustam Kasimdzhanov
FIDE World Championship Tournament (2005), San Luis ARG, rd 11, Oct-10
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 34 times; par: 33 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 22 more Anand/Kasimdzhanov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Viswanathan Anand vs Rustam Kasimdzhanov (2005)
Photograph copyright © 2005 World Chess Championship Press.  Used with permission.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-11-05  markantony: Not that I am even good, but 6. ...e5 is already given a weakness to the d-pawn. If I play sicilian I tend to prefer e6 over that to be more flexible.
Oct-11-05  Averageguy: <markantony> It has always been the subject of a heavy debate, but the ganeral opinion nowadays is that 6...e5 is perfectly okay, in that the d6 pawn, while backward, isn't vulnerable enuogh so that white can win it by force, at least not immediatly. As for the weakness on d5, unless white can somehow get a position where it is something like a white knight on d5 versus a blacks quare bishop, black usually has sufficient control over d5 to eliminate a knight sould it venture there. Black will also at some point aim to get in a favourable ...d5 advance, as this tends to free his game and give his pieces more. This break is the most normal for black in almost all sicilians. As for the game, I personally think that black should have castled instead of playing 10...Be7 instead of Nb6, aiming to castle quickly.
Oct-11-05  AdrianP: [Event "ESP-chT Honor 1 49th"]
[Site "Merida"]
[Date "2005.08.24"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Bologan,Viktor"]
[Black "Gelfand,Boris"]
[Result "1/2"]
[Eco "B90"]
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Be3 e5 7.Nb3 Be6 8.f3 Nbd7 9.Qd2 b5 10.0-0-0 Nb6 11.Qf2 Nc4 12.Bxc4 bxc4 13.Na5 Nd7 14.Nc6 Qc7 15.Nb4 Qb7 16.Nbd5 Rb8 17.b3 cxb3 18.cxb3 Be7 19.Kb2 Bd8 20.Rd3 0-0 21.g4 Kh8 22.Rc1 Ba5 23.Rc2 Rfc8 24.Na4 Qb5 25.Rxc8+ Rxc8 26.Rd1 Nc5 27.Nxc5 dxc5 28.a4 Qc6 29.Qc2 Bd8 30.Rc1 Bxd5 31.exd5 Qxd5 32.Qe4 Qd7 33.Bxc5 h6 34.Rc2 Rb8 35.Ka2 Bf6 36.Ba3 Bg5 37.Bb2 f6 38.h3 Qf7 39.Qd3 Qb7 40.Rc5 Bh4 41.Rd5 Bf2 42.Rd7 Qc8 43.Rd6 a5 44.f4 Bc5 45.Rd5 exf4 46.Rf5 Qc7 47.Qd5 Bb4 48.Qe6 Bc3 49.Qe4 Bxb2 50.Kxb2 Rc8 51.Qc4 Qxc4 52.bxc4 Rxc4 53.Rxa5 f5 54.Rxf5 Rxa4 55.Rf8+ Kh7 56.Rb8 1/2

Was the first outing for Na5!! as per <FHBradley>'s post. Maybe Rusty does his opening research on chessgames.com and got caught out...!

Oct-11-05  AlexanderMorphy: i hate to say this..but great game by Anand...i really expected more from the (let's say former) world champion Kasimdzhanov!
Oct-11-05  azaris: 13.♘a5 also goes unmentioned in IM Sammalvuo's book "The English Attack", though he gives the book line 11...♘xc4?! 12. ♗xc4 bxc4 13.♘c5 ♕c7 14.♘xe6 with good chances for White.

I don't honestly think Anand's move is that much better than 13.Nc5. It's certainly not worth an exclam, more like a !?.

Oct-11-05  CapablancaFan: <ChessLeader> You have exactly nailed down why Kasim completely played like an amateur this game. I just can't believe he just totally ignored the chess priciples handed down from generation after generation of GM's.

1. Develop all your pieces before undertaking and hostile action or going forward with any plan. To attack before development is complete in most cases is asking for trouble.

2.Never move the SAME piece multiple times before development is complete. In this case Kasim moved his knight multiple times only to have it sacked by the bishop before he completed development.

3. King Neglect- It is almost NEVER a good idea to leave your king in the middle for that long with that many minor and heavy pieces still flying around the board and expect that you will last long.

Very disappointing game by Kasim I expected better from him.

Oct-13-05  azaris: <CapablancaFan> In fairness, those rules are meant for people who don't know what they're doing.
Oct-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: all
<In a topical Be3 Najdorf, Kasimjanov appeared unsettled when Anand casually plonked his knight on a5 leaving it en prise to the Black queen. He should not have done, because it has been played before in the important game Bologan-Gelfand earlier this year. In certain openings, a knowledge of general principles is more important than specific moves, but in the Najdorf this is most definitely not the case. One would go so far as to say that it is a recipe for disaster.> - The CB website. (http://www.chessbase.com/eventartic...)
Oct-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: ---> all
It was a bad game by Kasim, but I think he knows the principles of chess.

Probably - as a master - I can say you lose this kind of game when you blindly follow theory and the latest developments, and don't fully understand the positions. (Black commonly takes risks from the Black side of the Najdorf, this is one of the ways you unbalance the position and create opportunities to win. However, you have to be VERY careful in just how far this goes, sometimes its kinda like walking a tightrope! -- Here Kasim fell off.)

Oct-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: I should also point out that the first encounter between these two parties in this tournament ... was won by Kasimdzhanov.
Nov-21-05  patzer2: Sometimes defensive moves have to be found early in the Opening in order to survive.

According to GM Shipov at http://www.chesspro.ru/events/sanlu... that appears to be the case in this game:

<Definitely stronger was 13...Nd7. The game Bologan vs Gelfand, 2005 went 14.Nc6 Qc7 15.Nb4 Qb7 16.Nbd5 Rb8 17.b3 cxb3 18.cxb3 Be7 19.Kb2 Bd8 20.Rd3 0-0 21.g4 Kh8 22.Rc1 Ba5 23.Rc2 Rfc8, and Black emerged better.>

Nov-21-05  patzer2: After 19...Nf6?! (better was 19...Nh2!? 20. Qf2! ), Anand sets a winning pin with 20. Bc5!

Black must surrender the decisive pawn as 20... d5 21. exd5 Bf5 22. Re1 Kd8 23. Rxe5 Bf8 24. Bxf8 Rxf8 25. d6 is completely winning for White.

Black could have put up a stiffer defense with 19... Nh2!? 20. Qf2! Nf3 21. Nd5 Bxd5 22. Rxd5 Qa4 23. Qxf3 Rxb6 24. b3 cxb3 25. axb3 Qa3+ 26. Kb1 Rb4 , though White retains a clear advantage.

Nov-24-05  Goran: I have posted annotations by GM Alex Finkel on http://chesslodge.blogspot.com/2005...
Dec-29-05  AdrianP: This line is the subject of a survey in New in Chess Yearbook 77 where Erik Hoeksema speculates that 13 Na5! might put the 10. ...Nb6 line out of business.
Jul-03-10  Blunderdome: Was Kasimdzhanov on Anand's team already in 2005?
Jul-03-10  RandomVisitor: 19...Nh2 20.Qe3 Nf3 21.Rd5 exf4 22.gxf4 0-0 23.Nxc4 <Qb7> might hold for black, 24.Qxf3 Rfc8 with complications.
Jul-03-10  dzechiel: White to move (20?). Material even. Very Difficult.

I never even considered the key move. And, in retrospect, it's obvious. <sigh>

Jul-03-10  fischer2009: @ azaris
13 Na5 is proved to be the best move in the position and is the reason y dis line is seldom chosen by black dese days;
Jul-03-10  Once: When I was a small boy, maybe seven or eight years old, I was overjoyed when Uncle Barry came to visit. You see, Uncle Barry was the first real person that I had ever played. I had learned the moves from a book - Irving Chernev's "Logical Chess". But no-one else in my school or at home could play. And that made Barry very special indeed.

What is more Uncle Barry was a Very Good Player (according to my Mum) because he knew the hidden secrets of chess strategy (again, according to my Mum).

And of course, in the very first game we played, he beat me. I tried my best, used all the stuff I thought I had learned from Chernev, crinkled my little forehead until it hurt, but he still won.

And then he did that Uncle thing. He gave me an enigmatic smile and asked "do you want to know why you lost?"

Be still my beating heart! At last, I was about to be taught the fabled secret of chess strategy! This was Morphius instructing Neo, Obi-Wan teaching Luke, David Carradine as a Shaolin monk ("Ah, grasshopper!"), it was Baloo and Mowgli picking prickly pears with the claw, Tarzan being taught by the apes. Except of course that the Matrix and Star Wars hadn't been made yet, but hopefully you get the point.

And what were his immortal words of wisdom, passed on to a tremulous child? From memory, they went something like this: "It's all about the middle of the board, see? Those four squares in the centre. So you need to get your rooks onto king one and queen one to attack those squares. And the best way to do that is to castle queenside and then bring your other rook to the king one square."

And that, it turned out, was the sum total of Uncle Barry's knowledge of chess strategy. In every game, he would castle long to bring his queen rook to d1 (or d8 as black), park his king rook on e1/ e8, and then ... hope that something would turn up.

I was puzzled. Here was a strategy that Chernev hadn't mentioned, and according to Uncle Barry, it was the only strategy you needed to know - the holy grail of chess. We played two more games and I won them both (largely because Uncle Barry left his pieces en prise and couldn't spot a knight fork when it was staring him in the face).

It was the one and only time that we played chess together. For some strange reason, he never wanted to play again and I wasn't too keen for more of his "wisdom". As a bookish boy, I went from "Logical Chess" to "The most Instructive Games of Chess ever Played" and was then blown away by "My Sixty Memorable Games". Uncle Barry and I didn't mention chess much after that.

But the years pass with frightening and inevitable speed and nearly 40 years later Uncle Barry is no longer with us. And I have come to realise that his advice has more than a germ of chess truth in it. The best players get their rooks connected and into the action fast, even if that sometimes means making concessions elsewhere on the board. They grab open or half open files. They prevent their opponents from castling.

In today's puzzle, the star of the show is white's dark squared bishop. Not just for stealing the d6 pawn, but for preventing the black king from castling to safety on the kingside. And that means that black never gets his h8 rook into play. It doesn't really matter if black gets to pinch a pawn or two on the kingside. With his king rook out of play, he is effectively a whole piece down.

And white, for his part, castles queenside to park his rook on the d1 file. Uncle Barry would have been proud. Okay, so the other white rook doubles on the d file rather than Uncle Barry's patented Rh1-e1, but that's just a detail which we can quietly forgive.

Today, I'll let the others do the kibbitzing about the moves and variations. I just want to say - thank you, Uncle Barry. You taught me a great deal.

Jul-03-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  tarek1: Naturally this is a saturday puzzle so there's no obvious tactical shot to decide the game immediately (at least I don't see it). I think that in this position, White's advantage is simply that he has castled and not Black.

But Black is only a tempo away from doing so. If Black could safely do so, he would be more or less ok. So as White we must maintain Black's king in the center to keep the initiative.

But our bishop on b6 is hanging, and the pawn on f4 is pinned. Can we sacrifice the bishop to play a building move ? If for example <20.Rhd1> a natural move, then <20...Rxb6> and sacrificing further material by fxe5 doesn't seem to work <21.fxe5 Bxd2+ 22.Rxd2 Nh5>

Also I didn't see anything convincing by <20.fxe5> immediately : <20...Bxd2+ 21.Kxd2 dxe5+ 22.Kc1 Rxb6 23.Qxf6 O-O> Here 24.Nd5 would be very strong if there was no bishop on e6...

I also considered Rxd6, Nd5, the interesting Be3, etc. and found nothing better than what I chose :

<20.Bc5>

Now, castling by Black would lose material :

<20...O-O 21.Bxd6> wins at least an exchange and two pawns

<21...Qc8> Black must remove the queen from the d file because of the discovered attack if exf4 then Bxf8 wins. <22.Bxe5> hitting the knight, and winning the exchange by Bxb8 next.

Instead of Qc8 Black has the clever try <21...Rfd8> pinning the bishop. But it makes things worse : <22.Rhd1 Rbc8 23.Bxe5> wins a piece and 2 pawns.

So 20...O-O fails, what else is there ? Allowing White to take on d6 would collapse the Black position for example <20....Qc7 21.Bxd6 Qxa5 22.Bxb8> winning material.

It seems to me that Black has to play the unpleasant <20...Bf8> delaying his castling even more After <21.Rhd1> White crashes through on d6 :

<21...Rd8 22.Bxd6 Bxd6 23.Rxd6 Qxd6 24.Rxd6 Rxd6 25.fxe5> winning

<21...Ke7 22.fxe5 Nh5 23.Rxd6> and the dicovered check next move is killing.

<21...d5> perhaps the best try for Black <22.Nxc4> the threats of Nd6+ or Nxe5 give white a crushing position it seems to me.

So I guess 20.Bc5 is probably not a bad move. Is there someting more forcing I missed ? let's check ...

Jul-03-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  tarek1: I didn't consider 20...exf4, but it seems that it's nothing special. White has a number of good replies, including what Anand played. 21.Rxd6 seems also good
Jul-03-10  okba1: i didnt understand the idea behinde Nh2?
Jul-03-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  scormus: I saw 20 Bc5 was the likely first move ..... but not much else. I'd never have got this. Its been a tough week

.... and my favourite oprning line as well

Jul-03-10  David2009: Anand vs Kasimdzhanov, 2005 White 20? 20. f5 is lunacy, 20. fxe5 is no better, which leaves 20. Be3. Black can reply 20...Qc7 and White's Na5 is vulnerable, but either f5 or fxe4 gives counter-play.

In a game I would play Be3 and wait for Black's reply: he might not find ...Qc7 and if he does I can cross that bridge when I come to it. Time to check: will my score of 1/5 this week improve? ===========
1/6 so far this week. 20 Bc5 is obvious - once you spot it.

Jul-03-10  Ferro: 21.Gxf4?

e5!!

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC