chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Michael Adams vs Peter Svidler
FIDE World Championship Tournament (2005), San Luis ARG, rd 8, Oct-06
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen. Normal Variation (B45)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 46 more Adams/Svidler games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you register a free account you will be able to create game collections and add games and notes to them. For more information on game collections, see our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Michael Adams vs Peter Svidler (2005)
Photograph copyright © 2005 World Chess Championship Press.  Used with permission.


Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-06-05  rya: close all the way
Oct-06-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: I'm glad Adams spurned the early repetition with 22. Qf3 but there wasn't much to work with on either side. A respectable draw.
Oct-07-05  Ezzy: Every single picture I have seen of Adams so far; he looks absolutely depressed and fed up as if he just wants to go home. I challenge anybody to find me a picture where he has just a slight smile on his face. But then again he has only scored 3 points in his last 14 games, with no wins. He looks a broken man. Wow, this chess is tough at the top when you are not winning.
Oct-07-05  WMD: <Every single picture I have seen of Adams so far; he looks absolutely depressed and fed up as if he just wants to go home.>

That's just his normal expression. If you saw him waiting for a bus, that's what he'd look like.

Oct-07-05  euripides: h6 is a beautiful and interesting move. A very interesting game for all Sicilian fans.
Oct-07-05  iron maiden: <Ezzy> Here's a closeup of Adams smiling (near the bottom, you probably won't recognize it at first). http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp...
Oct-07-05  Caissanist: Why did Svidler give the pawn back with 32...Rg8? After 32...e5 he would have had to suffer a little, but a pawn is a pawn.
Oct-07-05  Ezzy: <iron maiden: <Ezzy> Here's a closeup of Adams smiling (near the bottom, you probably won't recognize it at first).> Isn't it obvious. He's only smiling because his hands are covering the evidence of his sexual arousal because he's standing next to Judit Polgar; or perhaps it's Nigel Short causing this smile!! :-)
Oct-07-05  PinkPanther: <Ezzy>
3 points in his last 14 games? What are you talking about?
Oct-07-05  Ezzy: <PinkPanther> 2.5/8 San Luis and 0.5/6 against 'Hydra' - I think that adds up to 3/14.
Oct-08-05  iron maiden: You're not counting his even score in Dortmund.
Oct-08-05  THE pawn: It's really sad for adams though, I wouldn't see him as a world champion, but I was hoping he would get a better score and better games. Well, it's not like he has anything to prove, everyone knows he's extremely talented, but I think he's in a serious need of a break.
Oct-08-05  Ezzy: <iron maiden: You're not counting his even score in Dortmund.> Oh yeah. Forgot about that! :-) I am from the UK so I do support Adams. Shame on me for missing this in between tournament(which I actually watched, would you believe!) I think watching his sad expression all the time is 'spacing me out!'
Jan-20-10  AccDrag: Opening is Scheveningen (I would even accept Classical), not Paulsen.
Jan-20-10  paavoh: @Caissanist: <Why did Svidler give the pawn back with 32...Rg8? After 32...e5 he would have had to suffer a little, but a pawn is a pawn.> Perhaps he was a bit afraid of White getting the Rooks lined up on the g file, and g6 being a weak square. Rg8 ensured a clean way out.

By the way, I see you are just one posting away from an even 1000 kibitzes! Go for it!

Dec-02-10  aragorn69: <<- Which move that you’ve made in your career do you consider the very best? >

h7-h6 against Mickey [Adams] in San Luis.>

Peter Svidler at http://www.crestbook.com/en/node/1364

Jul-02-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: After 10 g4 the game had transposed into the English Attack of the Najdorf. This game was played in round 8; in the 2nd round Morozovich had played 10..Nd7 against Leko and the game had ended in a draw. 16..Bxg5 had been played on two previous occasions; 16..Ne5 was new but later Svidler thought that 16..Rfd8 would have been a lot better. It should be noted that (the previously played) 16..Bxg5 needed an improvement as after 17 Bxg5..Qxg5 18 h6 White has a clear advantage. Adam's 17 f4?! did not take advantage of Svidler's questionable innovation; better would have been 17 h6..Rfc8 18 Ng3!: ie. 18..Bf8 19 hxg..Bxg7 20 Nh5..Bh8 21 Nf6+..Bxf6 22 gxf.. Nxf3 23 Qxd6..Qe5 24 Qxe5..Nxe5 25 Bd3 with a big advantage to White. Svidler realized after the game that he missed a chance to gain the advantage with 17..Nf3! 18 Qd3..d5 19 Bg2..dxe 20 Qd7..Qb5!: ie. 21 Qxb5..axb 22 Rd7..Bd5 23 Rxe7 (23 Nc1..Rfe8 favors Black) 23..Bxa2+ 24 Kc1..Bc4 and Black is two pawns up. 22..h6!? was certainly an unusual idea; Svidler's rationale was that it would lead to only one file opened in front of his king rather than two. After 28 Bg2?! White had to work to earn a draw; 28 Ng3 was better. 31 Nd4 was a clever defense giving Adams active play in the endgame.

<Caissanist: Why did Svidler give the pawn back with 32...Rg8? After 32...e5 he would have had to suffer a little, but a pawn is a pawn.>

Adams offers 32..e5 33 Ne6..Rf7 38 Rdg1..Bf6 35 Rg6..Bh8 36 Rc1 with sufficient compensation for the pawn.

Adams erred with 36 a4?; instead, 36 b3 would have been sufficient for near equality. Svidler, however, missed the refutation 36..Rh2! when after 37 Rf5..b3 38 Kc1..d5! 39 Rf1 (39 Rxd5?..Re2 40 Nd4..Re1+ 41 Kd2..Bb4#) and Black's advantage is close to decisive; instead, after 36..b3? a drawn rook endgame quickly resulted.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC