Sally Simpson: Hi,
How about this game never happened but was Capa giving a lecture on a previous game he played and wanted to show what was possible if someone carried on copying moves. A game not on here is:
J. Capablanca - N. Grigoriev Moscow, 1914. Which reached this position. Capablanca played 8.c3.  click for larger viewhttp://www.365chess.com/game.php?gi...
J. Capablanca - N. Grigoriev, Moscow, 1914
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bc4 Bc5 5.d3 d6 6.Bg5 Bg4 7.Nd5 Nd4 8.c3 Bxf3 9.gxf3 Ne6 10.Bxf6 gxf6 11.b4 Bb6 12.Nxb6 axb6 13.Bxe6 fxe6 14.Rg1 Qe7 15.Qb3 Kd7 16.0-0-0 Rag8 17.Rg3 Rg6 18.Rdg1 Qg7 19.Kb1 Qh6 20.Qd1 b5 21.d4 Qxh2 22.Qf1 Rxg3 23.Rxg3 Kc6 24.Rh3 Qf4 25.Qd3 Rg8 26.d5+ Kb6 27.Qe3+ Qxe3 28.fxe3 exd5 29.exd5 e4 30.fxe4 Rg4 31.Kc2 Rxe4 32.Kd3 Re7 33.e4 Rf7 34.c4 Rg7 35.Rh6 Rf7 36.c5+ Ka7 37.Ke3 Kb8 38.Kf4 Kc8 39.Kf5 Kd7 40.Rxf6 Rxf6+ 41.Kxf6 c6 42.cxd6 cxd5 43.e5 d4 44.e6+ Kxd6 45.e7 1-0 Then there is this game
V Fernandez Coria vs Capablanca, 1914
This game has this position:
 click for larger view(Bishops on b4 and b5) but as a poster on page one on this thread notes a joke game gives Bb5 and Bb4. The Knights go to d5 and d4 then capture both Bishops and move back to d5 d4. The final position is this.  click for larger viewWhich is the final position as the Capa game minus the King's Bishops. The lack of providence plus the fact in this pages game the move 9.Qd2 is not a Capablanca move even in a casual/simul game. Black gets a comfortable game with 9...Nxf3+ 10.gxf3 Bxf3. White cannot play 11.Nxf6 gxf6 12.Bh6 as 11...Qc8 mates White. He would have played 9.c3 very similar to the move 8.c3 he played in Grigoriev game given above. It is possible he demoed this game, possibly in New York in 1918, someone took down the score and it got published. Or it was published as analyse to the Grigoriev game in his own magazine which was active in 1914 and someone ran with it. Good luck trying to trace the genuine source, don't give up but it has a funny feel about it. |