chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Samuel Reshevsky vs Lhamsuren Myagmarsuren
Sousse Interzonal (1967), Sousse TUN, rd 1, Oct-16
Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange. Positional Variation (D35)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 25 times; par: 27 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 1,570 more games of Reshevsky
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: All games have a Kibitzer's Corner provided for community discussion. If you have a question or comment about this game, register a free account so you can post there.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-24-04  clocked: Presented today by Dennis Monokroussos as a model minority attack. Interesting is the tactical resource that black had on hand if a waiting move such as 24. ... Kh8 had been played. For example, 25.b5 c5 dxc5 bxc5 a5 Bxe3!
May-24-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  PizzatheHut: I have a couple questions about the game. First, why did Reshevsky exchange his light squared bishop with 14. Bf5? I would have left it to help the b5 push and to pressure h7. Also, why did Reshevsky spend so many moves getting his knight to e2, only not to move again?
May-24-04  clocked: The knight manuever wasn't for the purpose of getting to e2. It came over to b3 to threaten Nc5 (21. ...f5?! Nc5) instead 21. ... Nf6 threatens Ng4, so h3. Now the threat of Nc5 is back on, so b6. The knight has done his job by creating weaknesses and needs to get out of the way (Nc1). Black creates a tactical threat with Bh6. b5? Bxe3! And finally N1e2.
May-24-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  PizzatheHut: <clocked> Thank you for the reply, and please forgive my ignorance, but I have one more question. What is the threat on 23. Nc5? I see that black played 22...b6 to stop it, but why? Say 22...Nh5 (or any move other than ...b6) 23. Nc5, then black can play 23...Rd7 and everything looks okay.
May-25-04  clocked: I agree! I wrote my comments before the presentation was made... Dennis pointed out that some commentators have given b6 a '?', (so you are in good company). One of the difficulties in chess is knowing when to respond to threats, and when to ignore them and continue with your own plans. In this case, the plans are fairly obvious for both sides, white will play for b5 and black should go for f5-f4. What I failed to notice, is that the b3 knight may also go to a5 in some lines after b5 is played. With the knight on f6, b6 keeps out the knight and allows b5 to be meet with c5!, as d5 is guarded. Instead of criticizing b6, Dennis praises the move, and it is the later removal of the knight to h5 which begins blacks problems. Dennis agreed with my Bxe3 idea above and gives Kg7 (which is better than my Kh8). Back to your Nh5 suggestion, indeed Nc5 R6e7 b5 f5 is fine. Instead white should play b5 straight away. 22. ... Nh5!? 23.b5 Bh6 (f5 24.Na5) 24.Na5 The interesting thing is that with the knight on f6 (and the pawn on b6) black cannot initiate his active plan, but neither can white. The position is almost a type of zugzwang where black "blinked first" with Nh5, when it was better to just pass with Kg7
May-26-04  drukenknight: Miagmasure is just a weird player who tends to back up his pieces. Why not 17...Bd8 which looks better for the B given the pawn structure.

I didnt see Dennis analysis (where is it?) but 24..Ne4 looks more sensible, the N just starts wandering.

27...Rd6 was obvious and maybe the last chance.

Why doesnt Reshevsky simply take 28 Nxd5?

May-26-04  Bears092: <Presented today by Dennis Monokroussos as a model minority attack>

where is this?

May-27-04  clocked: Don't tell me you don't read www.chessbase.com everyday!?
May-27-04  drukenknight: I dont get it, what am I supposed to listen to the radio at a certain time? What's his conclusion anyhow?
May-27-04  clocked: It's a live broadcast, with audio and a chess board, on Playchess.
Aug-21-04  Hanzo Steel: Yasser Seirawan's "Winning Chess Strategies" says this game ends:

31 ... Nxg4 32. Rxc6 Qxd5 33. Qa8+

He also uses it to illustrate the minority attack.

Oct-22-05  Kriegspiel: <Hanzo Steel> So it does. In fact, in annotating 31...Nxg4, Seirawan actually says that Black played this instead of the move shown on the Chessgames.com scorecard, precisely to *avoid* the subsequent response and counterresponse shown on the scorecard above!

"31...Nxg4 Desperation. Black finally noticed that his intended 31...Nxd5 fails because of 32.Rxc6 Rxc6 33.Qa8+"

What's going on?

Kriegspiel

Oct-22-05  Kriegspiel: <clocked> Why 27.a5 ? Seirawan says that Black cannot play c5 in response to White's b5, because after dxc5 White can then play Qxd5, winning a pawn. At that point, Bxe3 simply loses a bishop (or rather, trades it for two pawns). The knight on e2 (guarded by the knight on c3) also keeps the Black rooks from playing a bank-rank mate (...Re1 RxR ...RxR#).

Seirawan didn't say all this (merely the part about c5 losing a pawn), and in explaining the knight move to e2 he says some vague stuff about improving White's position. I had wondered, reading his text, why he wrote, after this move, "Now Black cannot play ...c5", etc.; why "now"? But after reading your kibitz (though misguided) the explanation for Ne2 becomes clear.

I'm surprised that a radio chess commentator endorsed Bxe3. Unless of course *I* am the misguided one here -- entirely possible since I've put my foot in it fairly often. :)

Kriegspiel

Sep-05-09  BISHOP TAL: I noticed this to kriegspiel, its hard to beleive after almost 4 years, nobody stated if this is another glitch in seirawans fine book, or a mistake of chessgames or no 1 really knows.
Sep-05-09  AnalyzeThis: <PizzaTheHut: I have a couple questions about the game. First, why did Reshevsky exchange his light squared bishop with 14. Bf5? I would have left it to help the b5 push and to pressure h7. >

He doesn't need the bishop to get b5 in. This is a queenside attack, to h7 is not important. The typical end result is a weak pawn on c6. Reshevsky removed a potential defender.

<PizzaTheHut: Also, why did Reshevsky spend so many moves getting his knight to e2, only not to move again? >

The knight on e2 threatens to go to f4, and black can say goodbye to the f4 pawn (after the b5 and bxc6 sequence). The knight on e2 forced black to keep his bishop on the rather useless h6 square.

Jan-17-10  notyetagm: Reshevsky vs Myagmarsuren, 1967

<Hanzo Steel: Yasser Seirawan's "Winning Chess Strategies" says this game ends:

31 ... Nxg4 32. Rxc6 Qxd5 33. Qa8+

He also uses it to illustrate the minority attack.>

<CG.COM> Perhaps you should make this correction to the PGN.

Thanks

Jul-02-10  BobCrisp: <In this position (Reshevsky v Myagmarsuren, Sousse, 1967) White played 28 Rbc1. David Abrams (Syracuse, NY, USA) writes that although that move was the subject of no remarks on page 132 of Winning Chess Strategies by Y. Seirawan with J. Silman (Redmond, 1994 and London, 2003), 28 Nxd5 is much stronger.

We add that the game was annotated on pages 14-15 of Chess Review, January 1968 by Hans Kmoch, who commented as follows on Black’s previous move (27...Rec8):

‘Black is speculating on 28 Nxd5? a6!’

However, Yasser Seirawan (Amsterdam) informs us:

‘I too was seduced by the idea that the retort 28...a6 would refute the capture of the pawn at d5. That is not the case, as the continuation 29 Rxc6 axb5 30 Rxc8+ Kg7 31 Nxb6 (the move I had missed) and 32 Rxb5 is a clean win for White.’>

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Jul-02-10  ounos: 33. Qa8+! is a cute way to finish this off - however black replies, there is Rxg6+!
Jun-22-12  bystander: According to the kibitzing, this game is already used in a lecture by Denis Monokroussos and a book by Yesser Seirawan to illustrate the minority attack. I saw it in a column by Nigel Davies (Chesscafe.com).
Jun-22-12  bystander: Can black afford 24..♘h5? 25) b5 is very strong now. Black has no changes for a kingside attack in the short term. What about a waiting move like 24...♖d8? If 25) b5, it is possible to play c5. The night can move to d7, the queen to b8, the rook to d6 and just wait and see.
Jun-22-12  bystander: After 27...♖ec8 I think 30) ♘d5x is possible. The black queen is pinned and the white knight can move to b4. Better is 27..Qe6. (Davies recommend 28)..♕e6 but this move is also very suitable on move 27).

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 145
from Pawn Structure Chess (Soltis) by Southernrun
Game 145
from Pawn Structure Chess (Soltis) by diegoggil
Game 145
from Pawn Structure Chess (Soltis) by Ziiggyy
chocobonbon's favorite games
by chocobonbon
Attk Minority attack Compiled by refutor
by fredthebear
Attk Minority attack Compiled by refutor
by passion4chess
Reshevsky's model minority attack from the 1967 Sousse Interzon
from Middlegame Motifs: The Minority Attack by notyetagm
Game 145
from Pawn Structure Chess (Soltis) by Patca63
32 ... Qd7xNd5? lines up with White c6-rook which can check
from Moving onto line of checking piece provokes disc by notyetagm
Minority attack
by refutor
Carlsbad - Minority Attack (1)
from Pawn Structures by Simpo137
Reshevsky's model minority attack from the 1967 Sousse Interzon
from Whites d4 by fredthebear
Game 145
from Pawn Structure Chess (Soltis) by Jersey Joe
Minority Attack
by Bjorn Brekke
Game 145
from Pawn Structure Chess (Soltis) by Paskbr
Challenger of 48 Reshevsky_125
by Gottschalk
bateria, duplo at, bola 8 na cacapa depois de troca
from Who did it first? by lonchaney
Game 145
from Pawn Structure Chess (Soltis) by Qindarka
Carlsbad Structure
from Select Games by lioric
Game 145
from Pawn Structure Chess (Soltis) by Okavango
plus 3 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC