Vladas Mikenas vs Anatolij Bannik (1957)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Vladas Mikenas vs Anatolij Bannik
USSR Championship (1957), Moscow URS, rd 10, Feb-03
Caro-Kann Defense: Advance. Bronstein Variation (B12) · 1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess

explore this opening	find similar games	7 more V Mikenas/A Bannik games
sac: 30.R1xd5	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Apr-28-20		watwinc: First?

Apr-28-20		An Englishman: Good Evening: Good old Mikenas--can always count on him to find an unusual tactical resource. 29.Bc1 with the threat of Qxe4 proved a clever little trick to induce the attempted counter 29...Qe8. White's final move threatens 32.Qf5X or Qg6X. Black might have tried 7...Nd7 or 7...Bxc5.

Apr-28-20		agb2002: Black threatens Qxd7. White can keep the rook on d7 with 30.R1xd5: A) 30... exd5 31.Qxg4 A.1) 31... Qe6 32.Qg6#. A.2) 31... Qxd7 32.Qxd7 + - [Q+N+P vs 2r]. B) 30... h5 31.Qxe4 wins a piece and a pawn (31... exd5 32.Qf5#).

Apr-28-20		saturn2: <An Englishman White's final move threatens 32.Qf5X or Qg6X.> 32 Qg6 is not mate because of the black queen.

Apr-28-20		TheBish: Not too difficult, but not too easy for a Tuesday.

Apr-28-20		Brenin: <saturn2> 32 Qg6 is the alternative mate if Black stops the mate on f5 with 31 ... Qe6. After 30 R1xd5 Black's only realistic alternative was a humiliating return to h5 with 30 ... Qh5, allowing 31 Rxe5 and 32 Bf4 with a devastating attack.

Apr-28-20		mel gibson: I didn't see that. Stockfish 11 says mate in 24 which I don't think you could call easy? 30. R1xd5 (30. R1xd5 (♖d1xd5 e6xd5 ♕e2xg4 ♕e8xd7 ♕g4xd7 ♖a8-e8 ♕d7-f5+ ♔f6-g7 ♕f5-g6+ ♔g7-f8 ♘h4-f5 ♖e8-e7 ♗c1-e3 ♖h8-g8 ♗e3xh6+ ♖g8-g7 ♗h6xg7+ ♖e7xg7 ♕g6-e6 d5-d4 ♕e6xe5 ♖g7-d7 ♕e5-e6 ♖d7-a7 ♕e6-f6+ ♔f8-e8 ♕f6-e5+ ♔e8-f7 ♕e5-g7+ ♔f7-e6 ♘f5xd4+ ♔e6-d6 ♕g7xa7 b5-b4 ♕a7xa6+ ♔d6-e7 ♕a6-e6+ ♔e7-d8 ♕e6-d6+ ♔d8-c8 ♘d4-e6 ♔c8-b7 ♘e6-c5+ ♔b7-a8 ♕d6-a6+ ♔a8-b8 ♕a6-b7+) +M24/64 245)

Apr-28-20		TheaN: <mel gibson: I didn't see that. Stockfish 11 says mate in 24 which I don't think you could call easy?> Interesting point how our deduction goes. Would it have been easier if it said +10? In the end that usually comes down to about #20-30 also, yet when the evaluation goes beyond +5 on a usual Tuesday we all say "and a win" without any real evaluation of the quickness of the mate etc. One flows into the other naturally. This puzzle in itself is a proper deduction. We can't save Rd7 with the exception of one move, that move is a sacrifice but followed by a killer that justifies said sacrifice. So besides looking for direct queen sacs I saw this and went for it immediately. <30.R1xd5> protects Rd7 so Black will pretty much have to take on d5. Any alternative will just fuel White's attack a piece down. <30....exd5 31.Qxg4> and due to the dual threat of Qf5# and Qg6# Black's forced to <31....Qxd7 32.Qxd7 +-> but the attack isn't over and Be5 is in huge peril, and only trying to save it goes at the cost of d5 and a relatively simple game will follow for White.

Apr-28-20		pittpanther: I found this pretty tough for a Tuesday, was more like Wednesday level in my opinion. But maybe i am a bit slow today :)

Apr-28-20		chrisowen: Judge and Jury?

Apr-28-20		spazzky: triple threat of either Qf5#, Qg6#, or Qg7#

Apr-28-20		zb2cr: A cool way to end. White threatens mate at f5, g6, or g7, depending on how Black plays.

Apr-28-20		AlicesKnight: Found the correct route. Black can play ...h5 but Qxe4 leaves no real chance.

Apr-28-20		mel gibson: <Interesting point how our deduction goes. Would it have been easier if it said +10? In the end that usually comes down to about #20-30 also, yet when the evaluation goes beyond +5 on a usual Tuesday we all say "and a win" without any real evaluation of the quickness of the mate etc. One flows into the other naturally. This puzzle in itself is a proper deduction. We can't save Rd7 with the exception of one move, that move is a sacrifice but followed by a killer that justifies said sacrifice. So besides looking for direct queen sacs I saw this and went for it immediately.> There were many other places to move the Rook on d7. e.g place it on g7 and if the King takes it then Qxg4+. Also Rook on d7 to take the Knight which still wins! Then simply Qxg4 - leads to a draw but still had to be tested. There are many lines to investigate before choosing the best move - which is - the one that leads to checkmate in 24 moves.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]

30.? (Tuesday, April 28)
from Puzzle of the Day 2020 by Phony Benoni

Caro-Kann Def: Advance. Bronstein Var (B12) 1-0 30.?
from B 12 Vitamins for Fredthebear by fredthebear

MKD's Caro Kann
by MKD

Caro-Kann Defense: Advance. Bronstein Var (B12) 1-0 30.?
from M&M players... it's a mixed bag of FTB flavors by fredthebear

Tactics
by Lokys

30.? (Tuesday, April 28)
from POTD Caro-Kann 2 by takchess

30.? (April 28, 2020)
from Tuesday Puzzles, 2018-2022 by Phony Benoni

USSR Championship 1957
by suenteus po 147