chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Henry Bird vs Joseph Blackburne
London (1899), London ENG, rd 6, Jun-06
Philidor Defense: Alapin-Blackburne Gambit (C41)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 41 more Bird/Blackburne games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-21-08  Knight13: Here, the double pawns ARE weak. Too weak! I bet Silman wouldn't say anything if I told him that.
Dec-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Beautiful play by Blackburne. He emerges from the opening with positional advantages, which he gradually converts into a win in a surprisingly modern style.
Dec-09-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: Sorry to dissent from the prior opinions on this game, but I think Blackburne mishandled the opening and that--despite his foul-looking pawn structure--Bird had the better of the encounter until his incredibly weak play towards the end.

Blackburne's 3...Bg4? is a well-known mistake. This was the moved played against Morphy in his famous game against the Duke of Brunswick and Count Isouard. Needless to say, Blackburne plays the line better than did Morphy's opponents, but still had the worst of it until Bird's unfortunate Queen sallies on moves 10 and 11. Even with his isolated doubled King's pawn, Bird had the better game after Blackburne's poor 15...g5. All Bird had to play was 16. Qb5. Instead, he played the loony 16. Qa3, allowing Blackburne to saddle him with a second pair of doubled pawns.

Even with his atrocious pawn structure, Bird had all the chances through about move 33. He needed to play the obvious 34. a5, but instead began a downward spiral that lost him the game. He had another chance to play 35. a5 after Blackburne's weak 34...Kc7, but then game away his entire edge with 35. Nc4,and then got himself into realntrouble by playing the wrong Knight to d2 on move 36.

Just when it appeared Blackburne was back in business, he unaccountably failed to snatch the e pawn with 39...Bxe4, instead pursuing a bad idea with 39...Bb5, and then erred with 40...Kb7 (instead of 40...Kc6).

Bird now only had one set of doubled pawns, and had the (slightly) better game until his misguided 44. Rb1 (instead of the move the position cried out for, 44. Rd6). Even then, Bird could have made a fight of it had he played 45. Rd7 check (instead of his insipid 45. Rd5). Bird now had himself tied up in knots, in addition to his doubled pawns.

Bird's 48. e5 was bad, and his 51. Ra1 check ended his chances altogether. Blackburne soon won a piece, and the game was over.

Disappointingly, Blackburne (known for his brilliant combinations) missed a pretty way to finish the game. He could have played 58...Rxa5 or 59...Rxa5 and redeemed this otherwise poor game. Blackburne's actual winning procedure was just as effective, but after his great Rook sacrifice against Lasker two rounds earlier, Blackburne fans were entitled to see a flash of his greatness as he wrapped up this sorry encounter.

Jan-17-23  the eel: In my opinion 3--Bg4 is not a mistake but the prelude to a tricky gambit with which I have had several wins. Similar positions can be reached via the Englund Gambit after 1 d4 e5 2 dxe Nc6 3 Nf3 d6 4 exd Bxd6.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC