chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Alexander Alekhine vs Milan Vidmar
New York (1927), New York, NY USA, rd 13, Mar-09
Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange. Saemisch Variation (D35)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 15 more Alekhine/Vidmar games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-07-04  schaduw2: Alekhine had planned 20.Qh8+ but after Kf7! 21.Tf1+ Kg6!! the queen is lost!
Jun-11-08  Zickzack: According to Vidmar, Alekhine fell into long calculations in his 20th move. Apparently, because he did not see the mentioned line 20. Qh8+ Kf7. 21. Tf1+ Kg6 before. Capablanca told Vidmar around the 19th move that he, Vidmar, was completely lost. Vidmar denied it, Capablanca insisted, Vidmar denied again, and then Capablanca had a deeper look. When Capablanca found the refutation of Qh8+, he shouted "Mon dieu".

In the tournament book however, Alekhine claimed to have seen it coming since ten moves and that the combination was supposed to end in a perpetual check. This is very unlikely, given Vidmar's story. Vidmar stresses that he himself struggled from move to move and was really happy when this tactical resource showed up.

Apr-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: I agree with you, <Zickzack>, that Alekhine must have realized only belatedly that his "attack" was only sufficient for perpetual.

In the new (and first English-language) edition of the tournament book ("New York 1927", by Alexander Alekhine, tr. by Mary Lawrence, Russell Enterprises, Inc. (c)2011, at page 118), Alekhine's phlegmatic comment to <18. Rxf8+> (with an appended "!" from AA) reads: "The point of the first sacrifice, whereby an immediate draw is reached."

Objectively stronger, however, in this position (after 17. … Nxe5):


click for larger view

... would have been <18. Bc2> to preserve the LSB with a continuing and promising (but not yet decisive) attack. It is hard to believe that playing the White pieces against Vidmar, Alekhine was looking for an early way to force a draw.

Finally, it also is rather astonishing that Capablanca and Vidmar would have been conversing during the round in the manner described. It called to mind this game: Flohr vs Capablanca, 1936, where Capablanca justifiably felt aggrieved by Euwe's assistance (with the move count as the time control approached) to Flohr.

Apr-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: One further thought: If this had been anyone else's game, Alekhine certainly would have mentioned the possibility of <18. Bc2> in his notes. Since it was his own game, he probably didn't want to admit he failed to see at the time that <18. Rxf8+> was not good enough to win, so his notes present the impression he was aiming for an early draw all along. Nevertheless, intellectually honest annotations should have included mention of the possibility of playing speculatively for a win at move 18.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
A Vidmar Sampler
by Resignation Trap
New York 1927
by Benzol
Damegambiet
by Chessdreamer
A Vidmar Sampler Compiled by Resignation Trap
by fredthebear
New York 1927 - Alekhine
by igiene

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC