chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Emanuel Lasker vs Lucien Didier
Paris (1900), Paris FRA, rd 2, May-18
Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation. General (D37)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 15 times; par: 43 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1,539 more games of Lasker
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-20-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  sakredkow: The power of the bishop pair.
Jun-11-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: The crucial moment of this game came on moves 14 to 16.

After an approximately even opening, Lasker tried 14. Ne5?! (instead of the more solid 14. Bf5). This led to fascinating complications. After 14...NxN 15. dxN Qxe5, Lasker played 16. Bb5 (the "point" of his questionable 14th move). The position was now as follows:


click for larger view

Didier here played 16...Red8, so Lasker's little mini-gambit had paid off since he could now play 17.Nxd5 and get the better game. But Didier had an interesting option on move 16: play the intermediate move 16...Bd6 and then, after 17. g3, try an exchange sacrifice with 17...Qe6 (getting the Queen off the fatal diagonal). As best I can see, Didier would have had more than adequate compensation for the exchange (even apart from his extra pawn) and would have had much the better prospects.

Even after 16...Red8, Didier was still in the game after the exchange of minor pieces and both pairs of Rooks.

But Didier erred with 22...Nd5 (he should have played 22...Bc6 [much better than the Tournament Book's suggested 22...Qd7])after which Lasker's 23. Qg4 threatened mate in one. Didier could still have hung on had he played 23...f6 (better than the Tournament Book's suggested 23...Nf6). His actual move, 23...g6, created fatal weaknesses that should have allowed Lasker to blow him away.

Lasker, however, gave Didier a chance with 25. Qf3. The position was now as follows:


click for larger view

Didier here played 25...Nc3?, overlooking his hanging pawn on a7. Lasker took immediate advantage, playing 26. Qf4 and then, after 26...Nd5 27. Qb8. But had Didier played 25...Nb4 Lasker would not have won a pawn with 26. Qxf7+ because after 26...QxQ 27. BxQ Didier could have restored material equality with 27...Nxa2.

After 25...Nc3? 26. Qf4 Didier fell apart. His 26...Nd5? was awful (the only possible chance was 26...b5), and his 29...Ne7? was an obvious blunder, and allowed Lasker to end the game with the vicious pinning move 30. Ba6.

As usual, Lasker exploited chances his opponent made available to him. And his 14. Ne5?! transformed an even position into a tactical maze in which his overmatched opponent lost his way.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC