chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Joseph Blackburne vs Johannes Zukertort
Blackburne - Zukertort (1881), London ENG, rd 10, Jul-18
Scotch Game: Mieses Variation (C45)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35437 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 44 more Blackburne/Zukertort games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-07-13  optimal play: This was the tenth game of the match between Blackburne and Zukertort played at London in 1881

After round 10 the match score stood at:-

½ ½ 1 1 1 0 1 ½ 1 ½ [+5 =4 -1] (7/10) Zukertort
½ ½ 0 0 0 1 0 ½ 0 ½ [+1 =4 -5] (3/10) Blackburne

With the victor to be determined by the first player to seven wins (draws not counting) Zukertort maintained his lead over Blackburne at 5 wins to 1 win.

Feb-07-13  optimal play: <The tenth game of the match was commenced on Monday, the 18th inst., at the St. George’s Chess Club.

The opening was the same sort of Scotch Gambit as in the second game of the match, with the alteration of P to K 5 on the sixth move... which line of play seemed to give Blackburne the best of the development, while his opponent laboured under the disadvantage of a doubled P on the Q side.

Blackburne, however, lost time in placing his R at Q sq on the 11th move; and again on the 15th move he blocked his B uselessly with his Q, instead of retreating to B sq.

His pieces on the Q side became so much hampered, that his opponent might have obtained the superior game on the 18th move by attacking the Q B P at R 4 with the Q as soon as White’s Q Kt was developed; instead of which, Zukertort advanced the K R P for an attack on the K side, and this far-advanced P ultimately proved a source of weakness.

The manœuvring on both sides presented most interesting phases, and virtually lasted up to the 31st move, when Blackburne, by the entrance of his Kt at K Kt 5, obtained two bishops against B and Kt, at the same time preparing a strong attack with his pawns on the K Kt and K B file, which compelled Zukertort to leave his advanced R P undefended.

Blackburne ought not to have hesitated to capture it, though it apparently exposed his K side; for there was in reality no danger, and the adverse Kt would have been imprisoned, unless Black gave up another P.

However, his game was still good enough, and he could afford to place his two rooks in a very awkward position; but, to the surprise of connoisseurs, he relieved Black on the 36th move from his greatest weakness on the Q side, the doubled P on the Q B file, for no other reason than to give a useless check.

This involved besides subsequent loss of time by retreating the B; but he retained still sufficient superiority to be able to sacrifice the exchange for a P on the 42nd move.

At this point the fight became most exciting, and both parties had an extremely difficult game to conduct.

On the 45th move Blackburne offered the exchange of rooks too soon, while he could have gained a most important move by finessing with the K to Kt sq.

Zukertort then released himself from the more immediate danger by exchanging pawns, which left the opponent with two dangerous passed pawns in the centre, and then, by a beautiful attack on the Q with the B, he forced the exchange of Queens.

After one move more made by Zukertort, the game, which had already lasted seven hours, was adjourned till the following Wednesday, Mr Blackburne giving his reply in a sealed envelope.>

.../2

Feb-07-13  optimal play: <On the resumption of the game at Simpson’s, Zukertort executed a manœuvre with his R forming part of a combination for stopping the adverse pawns which he may well be proud of from the practical point of view, for it appears that the only other feasible line of play, viz., R to R 5, would have lost, while the move adopted raised a great number of difficult complications, and actually a draw was effected.

But we have devoted great care and attention to the study of this position, and, though we may cause some disappointment, it is our duty as faithful analysts to pronounce, contrary to the opinion of both players, that the process to which Black resorted ought not to have succeeded in averting defeat. We produce below [*] some analytical proof as far as our space will permit, following chiefly the line of play proposed afterwards by the two opponents. The rest must be a matter for position judgment, and for our part we believe that the white pawns should have won against the exchange.

As it was, the parties kept bishops of opposite colours. Blackburne’s superiority of two pawns being divided on the two wings, and, though he tried various dodges, he could not dislodge the adverse K and B from the commanding positions which stopped the progress of both pawns.

The game then declared drawn.

Duration, nine hours.>

<The Field, London, 1881.07.23>

http://www.chessarch.com/archive/18...

[*] 52.a4 c4 53.Bxc4

<We give a diagram of this fine position before White’s last move:>


click for larger view

<53.bxc4 was the right play. It is impossible to exhaust all variations, and we can only give a few moves of a modification of the main line of play as tried afterwards by the two players, feeling sure, however, that the pawns ought to have the best of the struggle against the exchange in any case. Supposing: 53.bxc4 Rxa4 54.Kf3 Ra1 55.e6 (threatening to win at once by 56.Bd6+, followed accordingly by the advance of the e-pawn, or by 57.Bc6+) 55...Ke7 (or 55...Bf6; or 55...Bb4 56.f6 Rf1+ 57.Bf2 a5 [This seems best; if 57...Bc5, White checks at once with the pawn at e7, and Black has only lost a move] 58.Bc6 Rc1 59.c5 Rxc5 60.Bxc5+ Bxc5 61.Kg4, and wins both pawns, afterwards advances the h-pawn, winning easily) 56.c5 and the consistent advance of this pawn ought to win.>

<Wilhelm Steinitz>

http://www.chessarch.com/archive/18...

Jun-19-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 55.Bb5 traps the Rook and wins the game easily.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC