chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Mikhail Botvinnik vs Mikhail Tal
Botvinnik - Tal World Championship Match (1960), Moscow URS, rd 18, Apr-28
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation. Accelerated (E24)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35437 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 43 more Botvinnik/Tal games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: All games have a Kibitzer's Corner provided for community discussion. If you have a question or comment about this game, register a free account so you can post there.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-12-04  refutor: Tal comments that Botwinnik should have accepted the draw after 48.Rxe4+. does anyone with a tablebase know if it possible for White to win in this position? It looks like a draw to me :)
Jun-12-04  acirce: It is a draw even without the pawn. However, that is not completely elementary to hold, as Judit Polgar vs Kasparov, 1996 shows.
Sep-25-06  slomarko: or Kamsky vs Bacrot
Sep-22-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Tal had played 7..d6 in game #16. Botvinnik played 9 c5 to get rid of his doubled pawns. Tal captured away from the center with 10..cxb so he could play on the c-file; particularly the c4 square. Tal did not like the position that would have arisen after 12..Ba6 13 Bxa6..Nxa6 14 Qd3..Qb7 15 0-0 so he played 12..Ne8 instead targeting c4. He spent 36 minutes on this move and called it "the most difficult move in the match". 16 Qb3 would have maintained a more complex position which might have better suited Botvinnik's match situation (down 5-2). Tal could have played 18..Nxc4 instead but felt that his bishop would have been weaker than the White knight in the resulting endgame. Botvinnik offered a draw after 25 Rxc8; Tal could not explain why he turned it down. After 26..Nc4? (26..Ra8 was better) Tal had to fight for a draw. After the second mistake, 29..g5?, Tal's situation was even worse as he had to worry about the mating threat Rg7+ and Rf7. In time pressure Botvinnik missed 37 d5 which would have given him very good winning chances after 37..Rb6 38 Kd3..Nd6 39 Rxa3. After Tal eliminated the White pawns there were no serious winning chances remaining.
Mar-28-24  Petrosianic: A curious note in Tal's book after 35. Ke2!

<Now, at the very least, Black has a very difficult task - he has to find the least expensive way to get his king out of jail (he does not have a "get-out-of-jail-free" card).>

Would a Soviet citizen know enough about a capitalist game like Monopoly to be able to quote specific details from it? Or is this maybe something the translator added?

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC