position after 19.Kxf1 Marshall vs Lasker, 1907  (C65) Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense, 50 moves, 0-1 31. ...b3 Lasker vs F Duz-Khotimirsky, 1925  (C84) Ruy Lopez, Closed, 51 moves, 1-0 72. ...Rh8 Lasker vs Ed. Lasker, 1924  (C99) Ruy Lopez, Closed, Chigorin, 12...cd, 103 moves, 1/2-1/2 26. ...Rxb2 Rubinstein vs Lasker, 1909   (D30) Queen's Gambit Declined, 40 moves, 1-0 35. Kxf4 Levenfish vs Rubinstein, 1912  (C45) Scotch Game, 47 moves, 0-1 36. f3 Rubinstein vs Alekhine, 1911  (D15) Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, 76 moves, 1-0 16.Rac1 diagram error R@f1 not a1. Analysis is still good. Marshall vs Capablanca, 1909  (D33) Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch, 49 moves, 0-1 26.Re8 Capablanca vs Janowski, 1913  (C48) Four Knights, 54 moves, 1-0 35. axb3 Lasker vs Capablanca, 1921   (D61) Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox, Rubinstein Attack, 68 moves, 0-1 50. ...gxh6 Smyslov vs Xu Jun, 1985 (A49) King's Indian, Fianchetto without c4, 67 moves, 1-0 32. ...Nc6 Smyslov vs Golombek, 1947  (A07) King's Indian Attack, 53 moves, 1-0 41. Ne1 Botvinnik vs Smyslov, 1957  (A15) English, 69 moves, 0-1 49. Bxf8 Taimanov vs Fischer, 1960  (E46) Nimzo-Indian, 87 moves, 1/2-1/2 40. ...g6 Fischer vs Taimanov, 1971  (B47) Sicilian, Taimanov (Bastrikov) Variation, 71 moves, 1-0 55. ...Kb5 Spassky vs Fischer, 1972  (B04) Alekhine's Defense, Modern, 74 moves, 0-1 15 games