chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Henry Bird
Bird 
 

Number of games in database: 660
Years covered: 1848 to 1904
Overall record: +239 -301 =92 (45.1%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 28 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Bird's Opening (109) 
    A03 A02
 Ruy Lopez (47) 
    C65 C77 C84 C62 C67
 French Defense (28) 
    C00 C13 C01 C11 C10
 French (24) 
    C00 C13 C11 C10
 Giuoco Piano (23) 
    C53 C50
 King's Gambit Accepted (18) 
    C33 C39 C37 C38
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (64) 
    B25 B21 B73 B30 B32
 Ruy Lopez (39) 
    C61 C60 C80 C65 C63
 King's Gambit Accepted (33) 
    C33 C35 C39 C37 C38
 French Defense (27) 
    C00 C13 C01 C10 C11
 Dutch Defense (25) 
    A81 A85 A84
 French (21) 
    C00 C13 C10 C11
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Bird vs Lasker, 1892 1-0
   NN vs Bird, 1888 0-1
   Bird vs Steinitz, 1868 1-0
   Bird vs NN, 1888 1-0
   Bird vs NN, 1869 1-0
   Bird vs J Mason, 1876 1-0
   Bird vs Englisch, 1883 1/2-1/2
   Bird vs Pinkerley, 1850 1-0
   G MacDonnell vs Bird, 1874 0-1
   Bird vs O Gelbfuhs, 1873 1-0

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Bird - Jasnogrodsky (1893)
   Bird - Steinitz (1866)
   Bird - Mason 1875/76 (1875)
   4th American Chess Congress, Philadelphia (1876)
   1st BCA Congress, London (1885)
   Vienna (1873)
   Paris (1878)
   3rd DSB Congress, Nuremberg (1883)
   Wiesbaden (1880)
   London (1883)
   4th DSB Congress, Hamburg (1885)
   Vienna (1882)
   London (1899)
   6th American Chess Congress, New York (1889)
   Hastings (1895)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Challenger Bird by Gottschalk
   Alapin - Bird - Colle // The Players by fredthebear
   BIRD On The Bird's Opening-n-The Bird-Defence by saveyougod
   BIRD On The Bird's Opening-n-The Bird-Defence by FrankTheTank
   Vienna 1873 by JoseTigranTalFischer
   Vienna 1873 by suenteus po 147


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Henry Bird
Search Google for Henry Bird

HENRY BIRD
(born Jul-14-1829, died Apr-11-1908, 78 years old) United Kingdom

[what is this?]

Henry Edward Bird was born in 1829 in Portsea, Hampshire, in England. He learned chess at age 15 by watching players at "Raymond's Coffee House."1 By 1848 he was noticed as a promising newcomer in what would later become known as "Simpson's Divan" in London.2 He was admitted to the strong London (1851) international tournament, where Bernhard Horwitz eliminated him in the first mini-match. Bird became fond of unusual experiments over the board. In several games against Ernst Falkbeer in 1853 he tried <1.f4>, with dismal results. Nonetheless, this particular experiment would eventually become famous as "Bird's Opening."

Before 1878, Bird's career as an accountant prevented him from devoting much time to chess,3 but in the fall of 1866 he distinguished himself in an informal match against Wilhelm Steinitz at the Westminister Club.4 The first to 11 wins would triumph, and despite playing the games in the evening after a full day's work, Bird proved a tough opponent. After 17 games he was called away to America by his employers, and the contest remained unfinished with Steinitz leading only by +7 -5 =5. After this match Bird was recognized as an amateur of master strength,4 and he garnered invitations to very strong international tournaments such as Vienna (1873), Paris (1878), Vienna (1882), Nuremberg (1883), London (1883), Hamburg (1885), Hastings (1895), and London (1899). Though he generally gave a decent account of himself, his results were inconsistent and he rarely found himself near the top of the table. Despite his inability to win such strong events, in any given game Bird could prove dangerous even to the world's strongest masters. At Nottingham (1886), he used his own "Bird's opening" to defeat Johannes Zukertort in a wild tactical scramble that was typical of his romantic style: Bird vs Zukertort, 1886.

He boasted wins over virtually all the best players of his era, including Steinitz, Zukertort, Horwitz, Falkbeer, Adolf Anderssen, James Mason, George Henry Mackenzie, Cecil Valentine De Vere, George Alcock MacDonnell, Joseph Henry Blackburne, Simon Winawer, Amos Burn, Isidor Gunsberg, David Janowski, and Emanuel Lasker. Bird added to his legacy with several notable publications, including "The Chess Openings, Considered Critically and Practically" (London 1877), "Chess Practice" (London 1882), "Modern Chess and Chess Masterpieces" (London 1887), and "Chess History and Reminiscences" (London 1893).

Notes

1Tim Harding, "Eminent Victorian Chess Players- Ten Biographies" (McFarland 2012), p.111

2 Ibid., p.112

3 Ibid., p.121

4 Ibid., pp.115-117

Bird occasionally played consultation chess on the teams of Bird / Zukertort, Bird / Blackburne, Bird / Dobell, Bird & H Chesire, Blackburne / Bird / MacDonnell, Bird / H W Trenchard, Bird / Winawer / Blackburne, Zukertort / Bird / Hoffer, Bird / Hewitt, Colborne / Bird, Allen & Bird, Henry Bird / Frederick Womersley & Bird / Allies.

Wikipedia article: Henry Bird (chess player)

Last updated: 2020-12-03 05:46:07

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 27; games 1-25 of 660  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. C Smith vs Bird  1-0231848Casual gameB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
2. Bird vs G Medley 0-1291849LondonC00 French Defense
3. G Medley vs Bird 1-0421849LondonA13 English
4. G Medley vs Bird 1-0521849LondonD35 Queen's Gambit Declined
5. Bird vs G Medley 1-0331849LondonC00 French Defense
6. Bird vs G Medley 0-1241849London m2C01 French, Exchange
7. G Medley vs Bird 1-0471849LondonD35 Queen's Gambit Declined
8. Bird vs G Medley 1-0211849LondonC00 French Defense
9. Bird vs G Medley 1-0631849Ries' Divan TournamentB45 Sicilian, Taimanov
10. G Medley vs Bird 1-0361849Ries' Divan TournamentA85 Dutch, with c4 & Nc3
11. G Medley vs Bird 1-0531849Ries' Divan TournamentC01 French, Exchange
12. Bird vs A Simons 1-0501850Bird - SimonsC64 Ruy Lopez, Classical
13. Bird vs C Smith  1-0181850Casual gameC38 King's Gambit Accepted
14. C Smith vs Bird 1-0201850Casual gameC38 King's Gambit Accepted
15. Bird vs C Smith  0-1271850Casual gameC60 Ruy Lopez
16. Bird vs C Smith  1-0351850Casual gameC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
17. Bird vs C Smith 0-1151850Casual gameC40 King's Knight Opening
18. Bird vs C Smith  1-0301850Casual gameC38 King's Gambit Accepted
19. C Smith vs Bird 0-1211850Casual gameB53 Sicilian
20. Bird vs H Buckle  1-0311850Odds Game (Pf7)000 Chess variants
21. Bird vs C Smith  1-0201850Casual gameC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
22. C Smith vs Bird 1-0231850Casual gameC38 King's Gambit Accepted
23. C Smith vs Bird  1-0251850Casual gameC38 King's Gambit Accepted
24. Bird vs C Smith 1-0211850LondonC64 Ruy Lopez, Classical
25. Bird vs Pinkerley 1-0241850Odds game (Ra1)000 Chess variants
 page 1 of 27; games 1-25 of 660  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Bird wins | Bird loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 11 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-26-06  Knight13: <sneaky pete> LOL
Feb-07-06  Knight13: Henry Bird was still good doing 1889, but his strengh faded a little and didn't give him good results in the New York Interationals. But he still played well, though. Good enough to be 2200, at least.
Mar-28-06  FHBradley: What is a 'subchampion'? 'Henry Bird -- a subchampion of the world' sounds well-nigh ridiculous to my non-native ears.
Mar-28-06  Jim Bartle: In Spanish the word "sub-campeon" is commonly used to refer to a losing finalist or a silver medal winner.
Mar-28-06  who: Bird has wins against players like Bernhard Horwitz, Howard Staunton, Wilhelm Steinitz, Louis Paulsen, Joseph Henry Blackburne, Simon Winawer, Johannes Zukertort, Mikhail Chigorin, Emanuel Lasker, and David Janowski. He even had a plus score against Adolf Anderssen. Bear in mind that the latter part of this list are players who were more than twenty years younger than he. According to http://www.chessmetrics.com/CM2/Sin... he was number two in the world (behind Steinitz) for a short period of time.

All in all, it seems pretty clear that he was far more than just an expert, and at his prime he was a world class player.

Apr-29-06  Knight13: Yup. One of my favorites, <who>. He won many games against great players, but he lost many in his later years. For example, he got crushed by Steinitz pretty bad. I wouldn't be suprised if he was the sub-champion! :)
Oct-08-06  Knight13: Henry Bird's first page is all marked with Kibitz signs!
Jan-13-07  Themofro: Being a player who plays Bird's Opening a lot, here are my personal opinions for the set up white should get. It mostly depends on black's play. Variant 1
1. f4 e5
2. fxe5 d6 (if black plays the inconsistent Nc6 as is becoming common nowadays, DO NOT play Nf3 (that gives black a free and very strong irregular Lasker) instead return the pawn with what i find to be substantial advantade with 3. Nc3!) 3. main line continued. exd6 Bxd6
4. Nf3
Subvariation 1
...4. g5 (Lasker's variation.i It is quite popular though in my experience it is hard to play against but not that strong. With the Lasker variation black tries for many 1-2 move tricks, if white can defend with a level head he should get an advatage, though that's no easy task)

Subvariation 2 Nf6 (this leads to the Mestrel, which is extremely complicated and no one really knows who is better. Usually black plays Ng4 soon after.)

Variation 2.
1. f4 d5 (more common than the From's)
2. Nf3 (here it all depends on what move order black plays, i beleive that the following move order is best for black.) ...2 g6 (preventing white's fianchetto which is very powerful)

Subvariation 2.1 (the classical Bird's, which is quite strong i find) 3. e3 Bg7
4. Be2 c5
5. 0-0 Nc6
6. d3 Nf6
7. The key position here there are many alternatives, and it just depends on your personal taste, I personally prefer the straightforward Nc3, but thats just personal opinion.

Subvariation 2.2 The Antoshin (not that strong if black knows how to defend, but i hvae never met someone who plays it correctly as black. A great shocker weapon, white will often castle queenside and play Rdg1 and go for the kill, i've won many games within 25 moves or so with this variation, though ultimately I do't find it the main line.)

1. f4 d5
2. Nf3 g6
3. d3 Bg7
4. c3 Nf6 (or whatever)
5. Qc2 white aims for e4 again, just like in the above mentioned classical variation to set up a very stong pawn duo at e4+f4.

Jan-13-07  Themofro: My continued list of variations and ways to play the Bird's:

variation 3 ( the stonewall, very solid, I believe Knight13 mentions it earlier, only problems are two built in weaknesses, bad queenside bishop and e4, so white should aim to fix those two, if he's successfull he'll have a definite advantage.) basic move order is something like this.
1. f4 d5
2. Nf3 g6
3. e3 Nf6
4. d4 (or something to that effect.

Varitaion 4. the leningrad bird. in this system white finachetto's queenside, it's a very solid system with good chances for advantage, but i find it less aggressive (albei solider) than others, ont the best things is it avoids the so called "recipe" lines, wipes them off the board completely) basic setup of leningrad is as follows

1. f4 d5
2. Nf3 g6
3. g3 Bg7
4. Bg2 (white then castles and plays for the center)

Variation 5 the queenside fianchetto and the very dangerous Bird/Orangutaun

The reason that in all those aforementioned lines black plays ...2 g6 is to prevent white from fianchettoing queenside which can be extremley powerful. The normal line is to just play b3, but i prefer the more adventerous b4!?, this is the bird/orangutaun, it's mostly untested (like most of these variations) but i have been getting great results with it. I find that if white can easily fianchetto queenside then he should have a substantial advantage. Also in these lines white aims to be able to play Bb5 pinning the knight on c6 and then trading to get complete dark squared controll, this is why it's so important for black to stop qhite from fianchettoing, though white is perfectly fine regardless.

Last variation the so called "Recipe" variation. In almost all opening books that cover the Bird's (many don't period) they offer an early Bg4 as a solution to all of blacks problems, which is naive. The Bird Leningrad destroys the recipe, though other variations to find 2, but with very sharp play.

Lets look at the leningrad first.

1. f4 d5
2. Nf3 Nf6
3. g3 Bg4
4. Bg2 Nc6
5.0-0 Bxf3 (expecting 5. Bxf3 then e5 and play isn't bad at all. but... white instead plays) 6. Rxf3 e5
7. fxe5 (usually you don't take, but here it's very strong) Nxe5 8. Rf5 and black is already in trouble.

In the recipe variations that aren't the leningrad, white should NOT capture with fxe5 (then black has a excellent position), instead pursue a stonewall, once black plays e5 then white should play d4 and white is fine with a slight edge.

Those are most of the main variations for both white and black. In general I would say take the queenside fianchetto if they let you, and again Bb5 if they let you as well. If black plays an early g6 to prevent you from fianchettoing I reccomend either the classical or the antoshin. The leningrad is a perfectly fine and solid system, although not as aggressive as others, though still peffectly fine. If black play's the From either accept or transpose to the king's gambit, both are fine. And if black plays the so called "recipe" then fight back with a stonewall position and a slightedge. The stonewall position is important cause it shows up a lot from other variations as well. there's nothing wrong with a stonewall, it just depends on yor personal preference.

Well thats about my variations of the Bird's in a nutshell.

Note: if anyone is really interested in learning the Bird's Opening i extremley highly reccomend Timothy Taylor's Bird's Opening, he's a IM who plays it all the time, has all the variations, and shows what to avoid, what black seeks to get and he shows a balanced view that inculdes both wins for white and black. Highly reccomended.

Jan-17-07  Themofro: Ack correction on my previuosly posted Leningrad Bird. White fianchetto's kingisde i meant not queen side.
Jan-17-07  ganstaman: <Themofro> Thanks for all this. I've skimmed it and will read it in more detail soon. The Bird is one of my favorite openings, and I've probably played it more than any single other opening.

About Taylor's book, is it mostly just a bunch of lines and games, or is there a good amount of discussion too? The Bird seems rather straight-forward to me, so I don't know how much discussion there could be, but it would be nice to know if I'm missing anything.

Jan-18-07  Themofro: <gangstaman> Tim Taylor's gives a lot of lines and games (53 totally annotated games, unless i miscounted, lol). He gives a healthy portion of games that white loses (to show that the opening is NOT infallible and what to avoid, etc. I personally prefer opening books this way over books where every game the side the author is championing wins, but that's just me). It also shows you what he feels are black should try to do and how white should try to avoid it, or play against it etc.

By discussion do you mean like whether or not the Bird's is unsound because of the (supposed?) weakening of king safety, or do you mean what you aim for in this line and what are the critical themes, etc, he definately goes over those. Or do you mean something totally different?

Jan-30-07  howardb86: Thanks Themofro on your info for this opening. Found it helpful as I'm a newcomer to chess ! Certainly like the opening.
Jan-31-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Themofro>

What if Black begins 1. f4 Nf6? Larsen vs Fischer, 1962

Jan-31-07  who: <Themofro> After 1.f4 d5 you can prevent black's fianchetto on g7 by playing 2.b3 (recommended by Soltis). Amazingly annoying then is 2...Bg4, but still you should try it.
Feb-01-07  Themofro: <Keypusher> if black plays ...1 Nf6, white should just continue as normal with 2. Nf3 in my opinion. The immediate ...1 Nf6 lines almost always transpose anyway, usually into the recipe vatiation. A notable alternative is 2. b3. I haven't been able to find anything glaringly wrong with 2. b3 against Nf6, however in my opinion it is illogical. By playing ...1 Nf6 then black has basically let white fianchetto queenside whenever he wants to. Even if black plays g6 a move earlier than white plays b3, white can still fianchetto because of the knight on f6. Since black cannot avoid the fianchetto then, i do not beleive that white should rush it, but instead plays normal moves like Nf3 and e3 etc.

...1 Nf6 is a very common response to the Bird's but i beleive it to be inferior to ...1 d5 because it hands white the fianchetto which in combination with the knight at f3 and the pawns at f4 and e3, usually mean complete center domination of the dark squares. ...1 Nf6 is playable for black, but to play it is practically garunteed that you will have to try to nullify whites fianchetto or work around it, not easy to do. Overall i beleive that ...1 d5 is stronger.

<who> yes it is amazingly annoying, as such i play nf3 first. 2. b3 is playable atlthough i beleive inferior. In my experience white aims to fianchetto with good reason but he should not be overly hasty about it. A example is the following game which almost everyone on here should recognize. Lasker vs. Bauer 1889

1.f4 d5
2.e3 nf6
3.b3?!

here black did not play ...3 d4! and ended up getting killed by Lasker's brillian double bishop sacrifice. however if he had, black white's center pawn structure would have cracked regardless of what he did. While ideally all Bird's players love to have a fianchetto on the queenside, thats not the only good line. An example is the classical. If white fianchetto's on the queenside then he has nothing protecting the f4 pawn and as such not reccomended. However if white does NOT fianchetto the classical is very strong and well-neigh unavoidable for black. In my opinion and experience if white is allowed to fianchetto he should do so without much worries, but I firmly beleive that white should play Nf3 and e3 first to solidify the center at least a reasonable amount and get a grip on the dark squares, THEN add the bishop fianchetto. Of course that's just my personal preference. In some lines though like the previuosly mentioned Nf6 line and basically whenever black plays Nf6 before g6 there is no rush, as such white should definately take his time there.

Mar-15-07  Knight13: Too bad he didn't play play Daniel Harrwitz (or at least the games are lost).
Mar-24-07  Themofro: Another line against the Recipe variation which i'm afraid i left out on my mini reportoire is what i'm going to call the Danielsen Recipe, named after GM Henrik Danielsen who's the only GM what currently plays the Bird, btw, if your interested in learning about the Bird or just in good chess etc. he has a wonderfull website http://www.videochess.net/ where he posts live blitz games, analysis, openings, etc., worth checking out for sure. Anyway, in this varaition we have 1 f4 d5
2 Nf3 Bg4
3 e3 Nd7 (most logical follow up, from here the knight protects the square e5 without putting it on c6 and allowing Bb5) Now we enter the Danielsen variation 4 h3!? Bxf3
5 Qxf3 (attacking the d5 pawn) Ngf6 and now
6 g4!? the bayonet thrust!

Looks a bit crazy but completely sounds and oftens leads to complete steamrolling on the kingside for white. Depending on who you ask (Tim Taylor) you should sack the d5 pawn to try to get a initiative, or (Henrik Danielsen) you should not, lol. Overall it's a fascinating system leading to unique games and i would highly reccomend it at least for Bird's players to try it out.

Mar-30-07  Themofro: I have recently posted a complete analysis (with commentary and ideas from both GM Henrik Danielsen himself and IM Timothy Taylor) on the Bird's Opening (A02) page about the game that i first saw the Danielsen Recipe in and which first inspired me to play that variation.
Apr-14-07  Knight13: Burille vs Bird, 1889


click for larger view

Black to play. (Solution on move 22)

Jun-19-07  GamerMan: Of all the people that were never the leading chess players of their time, who do you all think was the most important? I think Reti, Nimzowitsch, and Bird have to be considered pretty high up there.
Jun-19-07  TefthePersian: Vsevolod Rauzer

That guy.

Jun-19-07  Themofro: <GamerMan: Of all the people that were never the leading chess players of their time, who do you all think was the most important? I think Reti, Nimzowitsch, and Bird have to be considered pretty high up there.>

Those are all good choices. Off the top of my head, i would add the other 2 cofounders of the hypermodern school Tartakower and Breyer as well since the work of those four was so important historically (other two being of course Reti and Nimzovitch). I think Larsen would also have be up included, and some legends like Korchnoi might also deserve mentioning.

Jun-30-07  ChessDude33: I'm sorry if this has already been mentioned but what do people think about Henry bird saying Steintz would get trounced by Morphy?

"I trotted Steinitz the closest heat he ever contested. He beat me 8 to 7, with 6 draws. This was in '67. In '58 Morphy beat me 10 to 1, with 1 draw. Steinitz claims that he is a better player than ever Morphy was, but I think my record with each is a fair test of the strength of the two. Steinitz claims that when I played with Morphy I was out of practice, but I cannot explain away my crushing defeat by that great player in any such way. I never played better chess in my life than when he beat me."

---henry bird

Every since I read this quote it has fascinated me. It does slightly appear that Bird has a harder time against morphy than steinitz (perhaps age is the factor?).

Jun-30-07  Karpova: Bird's results against Steinitz and Morphy are no indication of who might have been stronger.

Karpov beat Gulko 5-1 with 2 draws according to this database (1976 to 1996) Gulko beat Kasparov 3-1 with 4 draws according to this database (1978 to 1995 with a short draw in 2001) Draw your own conclusions...

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 11)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 11 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC