chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile

nimh
Member since Sep-23-06 · Last seen Apr-18-25
Chess is a combination of the science of making accurate moves, and the art of making the opponent to make inaccurate moves.

The five most remarkable players in chess history:

1. Paul Morphy
2. Emanuel Lasker
3. Jose Raul Capablanca
4. Robert James Fischer
5. Garry Kasparov
________________________________________________- ___

My homepage, dedicated to analyzing the level of chess play of various chessplayers:

http://www.chessanalysis.ee/chessan...

I'm currently doing an analysis study, where I compare roughly 2650-rated players according to chessmetrics elo rating throughout the history of chess. The aim is to find which level of play corresponds to a certain rating in different decades.

The latest version is available here:
http://www.chessanalysis.ee/Quality...

The methods are as follows:

I analyze games between 2600-2700-rated players. Moves by both sides are subject of the analysis. Results are displayed by decades from 1860s till 2000s. Plus, I also analyze games by 2000-2700-rated players after each 100 points from 2008 for comparisons.

The games are randomly chosen from the decades.

The start point of the analysis of every game depends on a period: 1860s-70s 8-th move, 1880s-90s 9-th, 1900s-10s 10-th, 1920s-30s 11-th, 1940s-50s 12th, 1960s-70s 13th, 1980s-90s 14th and 2000s 15th move.

The minimal length of a game is 20 moves + the start point; depending on a period it may vary from 28 to 35.

The maximum length of games is unlimited. Positions with fewer than 10 pieces are not taken into account, except blunders.

Rybka 3 Default with default settings is used for the purpose of the analysis. The time per position was 5 minutes on an older computer. Now it's 65 seconds per move.

Moves outside [-2; 2] interval are discarded.

The maximum value for an error is 4.00.

A separate engine is used to calculate the complexity of positions, Stockfish 14. The complexity of a position is determined from depths 2 to 15 and by adding differences between the eval of the best and the second best moves each time Stockfish 14 finds a new move. Differences found on the depths 10-15 are multiplied by 2.

Distribution graphs:

http://www.chessanalysis.ee/distrib...

Contains new positions that have not been included in the study yet.

________________________________________________- ___

The accuracy of famous chess players according to Blunder Check: (and the number of analysed games)

Paul Morphy 10.0% (31)
Adolf Anderssen 10.7% (10)
Louis Charles Mahe De La Bourdonnais 12.3% (18)
Alexander McDonnell 14.4% (20)
Francois Andre Philidor 21.0% (7)

>> Click here to see nimh's game collections.

   nimh has kibitzed 1809 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jul-25-24 A Ivanov vs Yermolinsky, 1993 (replies)
 
nimh: Either a saturday or sunday puzzle, white to move: [DIAGRAM]
 
   Jun-15-24 K Frey Beckman vs Browne, 1974
 
nimh: Such a gem and noone has ever kibitzed here... Featured today on chessbase.com https://en.chessbase.com/post/50-ye...
 
   May-04-24 Mikhail Chigorin (replies)
 
nimh: There's no k there. KH is a way to render a strong, forceful H in english spelling. And AI in 'hail' is essentially the same as EI in 'veil', isn't it so?
 
   Feb-18-24 Capablanca vs Park Avenue CC, 1931 (replies)
 
nimh: 14.Qxd5 and white has a won position. I wonder what sort of a trick Capa was afraid of... Could also be just an oversight due to hurrying, as it was a simul.
 
   Feb-06-24 Geller vs Benko, 1962
 
nimh: <Teyss> Pre-engine age. I don't know when he had analyzed it, but Heuer probably had too much trust in his analysis and didn't bother to check further.
 
   Sep-25-23 Hans Niemann (replies)
 
nimh: <A pleasure to "see" you, <nimh>, however briefly.> I should say likewise, but I've seen you here all the time already!
 
   Apr-16-23 Ding Liren vs Nepomniachtchi, 2023 (replies)
 
nimh: We could even be in for more than 50% decisive games in the match. Pretty unbelievable. When was the last time this happened in a WC match?
 
   Dec-06-21 E Williams vs Staunton, 1851 (replies)
 
nimh: My first reaction on seeing this was like "A Williams game?! Surely, it can't be a coincidence!" But it likely is
 
   Nov-06-21 Iivo Nei (replies)
 
nimh: <Palju õnne tema 90. juubelil, Iivo Nei.> I'm sure he'd be glad to know that someone far far away congratulates him. But correct would be "Palju õnne tema 90. juubeli<ks>. The transitive case instead of the adessive.
 
   May-29-21 Wilhelm Steinitz (replies)
 
nimh: <then find a few more words, please!> The most inferior among them? On absolute level he sure is due to rising level of play but in terms of greatness or superiority to contemporaries you can easily name several ones in turn inferior to him.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC