chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Boris Spassky vs David Bronstein
"The SMERSH Gambit" (game of the day Jan-30-2017)
USSR Championship (1960), Leningrad URS, rd 16, Feb-20
King's Gambit: Accepted. Modern Defense (C36)  ·  1-0

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
One of the deepest sacrifices this side of The Evergreen Game -- Soltis1-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 144 times; par: 32 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 23 more Spassky/Bronstein games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-01-05  Mating Net: The deeper mystery <aw1988> is why did Bronstein play 1...e5 and give Spassky the opportunity to play the KG?
Mar-01-05  MatrixManNe0: Part I: The Beginning

1. e4 e5 2. f4

<An interesting choice. Spassky has used the King's Gambit occasionally throughout his career, mostly as a surprise weapon. Here he tries it against one of his few grandmaster colleagues who also experiments with this old gambit from time to time.>

2... exf4 3. Nf3 d5 4. exd5 Bd6

<A somewhat unusual move. Normally Black plays 4... Nf6, often with ... Bd6 to follow shortly.>

5. Nc3

<Spassky makes no real attempt to refute Black's 4th move.

1) 5. Bb5+ is a natural alternative, both speeding up White's kingside development and keeping his centre pawns mobile, for examble 5... Bd7 (5... c6!? is a more ambitious reply) 6. Bxd7+ Nxd7 7. 0-0 Ne7 8. c4 0-0 9. d4.

2) 5. d4 with possible ideas of c4-c5 seems more critical. 5... Nf6 6. c4 0-0 and then:

2a) 7. c5?! (this immediate push is unconvincing) 7... Re8+ 8. Be2 Bf8 and now 9. Nc3 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 Qxd5 11. Bxf4 Nc6 12. Bxc7 Bg4 13. 0-0 Nxd4! 0-1 was the dramatic conclusion of Gons - Van Hofwegen, correspondence game 1986.

2b) 7. Ne5?! Re8 8. Bxf4 c5! (a thematic blow to White's centre) 9. dxc6 (not exactly the move white wants to play, but there is no decent way to meet the threat of ... cxd4) 9... Nxc6 and Black will regain his pawn while blowing open the centre.

2c) 7. Be2 Re8 8. 0-0 c5 9. Nc3 (9. b4!?) 9... Bg4 10. Kh1 is considered good for White by King's Gambit expert Joe Gallagher.>

5... Ne7

<Bronstein reveals the point of this move-order, giving the knight a more flexible role than it would have on its natural square, f6. From e7 the knight eyes both the g6- and f5- squares, but is a less robust defender of the kingside.

5... Nf6 leads back to standard positions after 6. Bb5+ or 6. Bc4.>

6. d4 0-0 7. Bd3 Nd7

<7... Bf5 is a more consistent follow-up to Ne7, seeking to exchange off White's aggressive bishop.>

Comp. Graham Burgess, John Nunn, and John Emms. The World's Greatest Chess Games. New York: Carroll and Graf, 1998, p. 236.

Mar-01-05  MatrixManNe0: Part II: Destroying One Hazard but Creating Another

8. 0-0 h6?

<Black cannot afford this weakening pawn move. Black's game will stand or fall depending on how much influence his pieces can exert, and for this purpose one of the following would be more appropriate:

1) 8... Nf6 9. Ne5 (9. Ng5!? is an interesting idea) 9... Nexd5 10. Nxd5 Nxd5 11. Qh5 (11. Bxf4 Nxf4 12. Rxf4 Qg5) 11... g6 (or 11... Nf6) 12. Qh6 Qf6 is equal - Spassky.

2) 8... Ng6 9. Ne4 Nf6 10. Nxd6 Qxd6 11. c4 Bg4.>

9. Ne4!

<Now, when his pieces are fully developed and his king is safe, Spassky prepares to advance his c-pawn. True, this move surrenders the d5-pawn, but in return White gains some precious tempi.>

9... Nxd5 10. c4 Ne3

<It is logical to make White give up his dark-squared bishop for the knight; otherwise White has a solid positional advantage:

1) 10... N5f6?! 11. Nxd6 cxd6 12. Bxf4 gives White a space advantage, better development, the bishop-pair and the superior structure.

2) 10... Nb4 11. Bb1 leaves the black knight out on a limb without inconveniencing White's attacking forces.>

11. Bxe3 fxe3 12. c5 Be7

<White has surrendered the bishop pair, and it seems that he will need to spend a couple of moves rounding up the e3-pawn - and in that time Black will be able to activate his forces. However, it turns out that Spassky has a far more daring scheme in mind.

Instead 12... Bf4? 13. g3 Bg5 14. Nfxg5 hxg5 15. Qh5 gives White a decisive kingside attack.>

13. Bc2!

<Playing directly for a kingside attack. 13. Qe2?! Nf6 (13... f5 intending ... f4 is rather too greedy) 14. Qxe3 Nd5 leaves Black well positioned; it will be hard for White to drum up attacking chances.>

13... Re8

<It appears a little unnaturaly to move away the main defender of the sensitive f7-pawn, but Bronstein wishes to coordinate his defences by bringing the knight back to f8, whereupon the queen's bishop can also participate. Instead 13... Nf6 14. Nxf6+ (14. Qd3 should be met by 14... Re8!? rather than 14... Nxe4 when 15. Qxe4 f5 16. Qxe3 followed by Ne5 secures a substantial superiority for White) 14... Bxf6 15. Qd3 g6 (15... Re8!? could be tried) 16. Qxe3 gives White the better prospects.>

14. Qd3 e2

<Rather than continue with the intended ... Nf8, Bronstein chooses to flick in this disruptive little pawn move. However, Spassky's staggering reply has ensured that this game will be remembered for a long, long time.

Instead 14... Nf8 15. Ne5 Be6 (not 15... f6?? 16. Ng5!! hxg5 (16... fxg5 17. Qh7+ is the same) 17. Qh7+! Nxh7 18. Bb3+ and Ng6# follows - we see this theme later in the game) 16. Rae1 is clearly better for white.>

pp. 236-238

Mar-02-05  aw1988: <Mating Net> The reason is well known- he simply forgot. But the Falkbeer Counter-Gambit is a fine opening, which Bronstein is more than capable of playing given his style, even with Spassky's deep knowledge of the KG.
Mar-02-05  Minor Piece Activity: <aw1988> That's the alleged reason. See refutor's post. Also Bronstein ended up playing the gambit with Spassky at least once after this game.
Mar-02-05  aw1988: I know, I was answering <Mating Net>.
Mar-02-05  Mating Net: I guess I don't accept the answer that Bronstein "forgot" what he was doing. One forgets to take out the trash, or forgets his car keys, but you don't simply forget that an opponent is undefeated, at the time, in a particular opening.
Mar-02-05  aw1988: It happens. One time something even more outrageous happened to Bronstein: in one of the WC games with Botvinnik in 1951, he set up the adjourned position... incorrectly!
Mar-02-05  MatrixManNe0: Part III: Planning the Assault

15. Nd6!?

<Objectively, this move is hardly necessary. Instead 15. Rf2 keeps an excellent position, but psychologically the impact of this surprise was enormous, with Bronstein immediately going seriously wrong.>

15... Nf8?

<Bronstein nonchalantly decides to press ahead with his intended fensive plan, even though his attempt to distract the white queen from the b1-h7 diagonal has failed. This turns out to have drastic consequesnces.

Instead 15... exf1=Q+ 16. Rxf1 is no improvement because 16... Nf8 transposes to the game continuation, while 16... Nf6 17. Nxf7! Kxf7 Ne5+ (18. Bb3+ also wins) 18... Kg8 (18... Kf8 19. Bb3) 19. Qh7+! Nxh7 20. Bb3+ Kh8 21. Ng6# is a pretty mate.

The critical line is 15... Bxd6! 16. Qh7+ Kf8 17. cxd6 exf1=Q+ (17... cxd6 18. Rf2 Nf6 19. Qh8+ gives White a decisive attack while Black does not even have a rook for his troubles) 18. Rxf1:

1) 18... Nf6? 19. Qh8+ Ng8 20. Ne5 (threatening mate and so forcing Black's reply; 20. Bh7 Qxd6 is less convincing) 20. f6 21. Bh7 Be6 22. d7! Bxa2 (22... Re7 23. Bxg8 Bxg8 24. Rxf6+! gxf6 25. Qxf6+ Bf7 26. Ng6+ Kg8 27. Qh8#) 23. Bxg8 Bxg8 24. dxe8=Q+ Qxe8 25. Rxf6+! gxf6 26. Qxf6+ wins the black queen, since 26... Bf7 27. Ng6+ Kg8 28. Qh8# is mate.

2) 18... cxd6 19. Qh8+ Ke7 20. Re1+ Ne5 21. Qxg7 Rg8 22. Qxh6 Qb6 23. Kh1 Be6 24. dxe5 d5 leads to quite an unclear situation. Black has survived the initial onslaught, but White has a pawn for the exchange and continuing pressure against the black king, which has long-term problems finding a shelter, and against Black's isolated d- and f-pawns. Bronstein would undoubtedly have gone in for this if he had seen White's 16th move.>

pp. 238-239

Mar-02-05  MatrixManNe0: Part IV: Avenging Dead Comrades

16. Nxf7! exf1=Q+

<Given that White will not be distracted from his attack, Black might as well eat the rook and pray for salvation.>

17. Rxf1 Bf5

<Or:

1) 17... Kxf7 allows a pretty forced mate: 18. Ne5++ Kg8 19. Qh7+ Nxh7 20. Bb3+ Kh8 21. Ng6#.

2) 17... Qd7 loses to 18. N3e5.

3) 17... Qd5 18. Bb3 Qxf7 (White also wins after 18... Qh5 19. Nxh6++ Kh8 20. Nf7 Kg8 21. N7g5! Kh8 22. Bf7) 19. Bxf7+ Kxf7 20. Qc4+ Kg6 21. Qg8! Bf6 (21... Be6 22. Ne5+ Kh5 23. Qxg7 forces mate) 22. Nh4+ Bxh4 23. Qf7+ Kh7 24. Qxe8 wins.>

18. Qxf5 Qd7

<By returning a bishop Black has gained a little time to defend.>

19. Qf4 Bf6 20. N3e5

<20. Nxh6+ is a perfectly good way to win material, but Spassky is after bigger game.>

20... Qe7

<20... Bxe5 21. Nxe5 Qe7 (21... Rxe5 just leaves Black a pawn down) 22. Qe4, with threats of 23. Rxf8+ and 23. Bb3+, is decisive.>

21. Bb3 Bxe5

<21... Ne6 22. Nxh6+! gxh6 23. Qxf6 and White picks off the e6-knight too.

21... Kh7 22. Qf5+ g6 23. Qxf6 forces an ending with a huge material advantage.>

22. Nxe5+ Kh7 23. Qe4+ 1-0

<There will follow 24. Rxf8(+). This finish was used in a famous scene at the start of the James Bond film From Russia With Love, but with the white pawns absent from c5 and d4 - perhaps the director felt they obscured some shot. The fictitious version of the game was between Kronsteen and McAdams.>

p. 239

Yes, I hope this will clear up some confusion. I'm surprised that the Rook sac really didn't give too much of an advantage!

Mar-07-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: <Matrix>
Actually ....... with the Pawns removed, the attack fails. (The shot in the James Bond Movie.)
Mar-09-05  MatrixManNe0: Just going with what the book says...
Mar-13-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: <Matrix>
You are correct ... the point I was trying to make is that most people don't know that the stupid, non-chess playing fool ... who decided the Pawns were unnecessary ... actually committed a chess crime ... and marred a great chess masterpiece.

Non chess-players should not intervene in matters that they do not understand.

In most movies you have a consultant, a specialist in his field. For instance, if the movie is about a form of the martial arts, they usually bring in a top guy in that field ... to avoid looking completely stupid and making terrible inaccuracies. However, they usually show chess no such consideration.

Mar-28-05  Windmill: can someone explain what the idea behind 17 ...Bf5 was?
Mar-28-05  PQB4: See the analysis given by MatrixManNeO:17...Bf5 gains a tempo for the defence to try to block a large number of threats. Things were already so grim Bronstein still went under, but there were only three other moves to save the queen and they lost too. I really enjoyed playing through the analysis: I would have thought it very difficult to analyse this game without presenting a mindboggling number of lines.
Mar-29-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: <Windmill, PQB4>
Yes, Black was pretty much forced to play "give-away" at that point. (Otherwise he would have got mated. If you are interested in the analysis, see my earlier posts on this page ... there is a link to my website.)
Mar-29-05  PQB4: Thanks a lot for the link, AJ. Good grief, what powers Spassky had. I've known of this game for 30 years and as I played through your analysis I was as amazed as the first time I saw it.
Apr-01-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: <PQB4>
Thank you sir ... very much!!

(This page generates 5-10 e-mails every single month. One night they had a lecture on some chess server on this game. Some person posted a link to my page ... I was flabbergasted to see about 50 e-mails about this game in my inbox.)

Jun-23-05  chesswonders: Is this the famous game in the movie 'From Russia with love' ?
Jun-23-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: Yes, it is.
Jul-17-05  calman543: They don't seem to play that movie much on TV. Seems Thunderball and Goldfinger get all the airtime.
Aug-17-05  RandyM450: Just out of curiosity, how do you think the game would have played out if Bronstein had decided to play 24... g6 ? Thanks.
Aug-17-05  Shams: <RandyM450> if you mean 23...g6 then 24.Rxf8 wins instantly.
Aug-17-05  RandyM450: Sorry. Yes, I meant 23...g6. How would 24. Rxf8 be an instant win? Black could respond with 24...Rxf8 or Qxf8, couldn't he?
Aug-17-05  Shams: yes, by "instant" I mean that black should resign. He can drag it out a couple moves: 24...Qxf8 25.Qxg6+ Kh8 26.Nf7+ Qxf7 27.Bxf7 with Qxh6 next. Or, 24...Rxf8 25.Qxg6+ Kh8 26.Qxh6+ Qh7 27.Ng6#.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 15)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC