chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆
TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Dortmund Sparkassen Tournament

Fabiano Caruana6/9(+4 -1 =4)[games]
Sergey Karjakin6/9(+3 -0 =6)[games]
Ruslan Ponomariov5.5/9(+3 -1 =5)[games]
Vladimir Kramnik5.5/9(+3 -1 =5)[games]
Arkadij Naiditsch5.5/9(+2 -0 =7)[games]
Peter Leko5.5/9(+2 -0 =7)[games]
Georg Meier4/9(+1 -2 =6)[games]
Daniel Fridman3.5/9(+0 -2 =7)[games]
Mateusz Bartel2/9(+1 -6 =2)[games]
Jan Gustafsson1.5/9(+0 -6 =3)[games]
*

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
Dortmund Sparkassen (2012)

The 40th Dortmund Sparkassen Chess-Meeting took place in the Dortmunder Schauspielhaus in Dortmund, Germany 13-22 July 2012. Rest day: July 18. Chief organizer: Ralf Chadt-Rausch. Players received 100 minutes for 40 moves, then 50 more minutes for the next 20 moves, then 15 more minutes for the rest of the game, with a 30-second increment from move one. Games started at 3 pm, Round 9 at 1 pm local time. Fabiano Caruana won on tiebreak (more wins) ahead of Sergey Karjakin, both with 6/9.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 Caruana 2775 * ½ 0 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 6 2 Karjakin 2779 ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 6 3 Ponomariov 2726 1 ½ * ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 0 1 5½ 4 Kramnik 2799 0 ½ ½ * ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 1 5 5 Naiditsch 2700 ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ 1 1 5 6 Leko 2730 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ 1 1 5 7 Meier 2644 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ ½ * ½ 1 ½ 4 8 Fridman 2655 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ 3½ 9 Bartel 2674 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ½ * ½ 2 10 Gustafsson 2629 0 0 0 0 0 0 ½ ½ ½ * 1½

Category: XIX (2711). Chief arbiter: Andrzej Filipowicz

The Helmut-Kohls-Turnier (Cat. IX round robin) was won by Andrey Orlov with 7/9. The Open A swiss tournament was won by Mikhail Zaitsev ahead of Julian Scheider, both with 7.5/9.

Wikipedia: Wikipedia article: Dortmund Sparkassen Chess Meeting#2012
Dortmunder Schachschule: http://www.dortmunder-schachschule....
ChessBase: https://en.chessbase.com/post/dortm...
TeleSchach: http://teleschach.de/schachtage/dtm...
TWIC: https://theweekinchess.com/chessnew...
DSB: https://www.schachbund.de/news/fabi...
FIDE: https://ratings.fide.com/tournament...
Dylan McClain in New York Times, 28 July 2012: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/29/...

Previous: Dortmund Sparkassen (2011). Next: Dortmund Sparkassen (2013)

 page 2 of 2; games 26-45 of 45  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
26. Ponomariov vs M Bartel 0-1512012Dortmund SparkassenC78 Ruy Lopez
27. Leko vs Karjakin ½-½332012Dortmund SparkassenE06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3
28. Fridman vs Kramnik ½-½392012Dortmund SparkassenD93 Grunfeld, with Bf4 & e3
29. J Gustafsson vs Naiditsch 0-1252012Dortmund SparkassenE94 King's Indian, Orthodox
30. Caruana vs G Meier ½-½582012Dortmund SparkassenC11 French
31. Naiditsch vs Ponomariov  ½-½422012Dortmund SparkassenC78 Ruy Lopez
32. Kramnik vs Leko ½-½1342012Dortmund SparkassenE01 Catalan, Closed
33. G Meier vs J Gustafsson ½-½532012Dortmund SparkassenB13 Caro-Kann, Exchange
34. M Bartel vs Fridman ½-½532012Dortmund SparkassenA13 English
35. Karjakin vs Caruana ½-½412012Dortmund SparkassenB42 Sicilian, Kan
36. Caruana vs Kramnik 1-0532012Dortmund SparkassenC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
37. Fridman vs Naiditsch ½-½452012Dortmund SparkassenE04 Catalan, Open, 5.Nf3
38. Leko vs M Bartel 1-0332012Dortmund SparkassenC18 French, Winawer
39. J Gustafsson vs Ponomariov 0-1702012Dortmund SparkassenD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
40. G Meier vs Karjakin ½-½562012Dortmund SparkassenD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
41. Karjakin vs J Gustafsson 1-0352012Dortmund SparkassenB18 Caro-Kann, Classical
42. Naiditsch vs Leko ½-½382012Dortmund SparkassenB12 Caro-Kann Defense
43. Kramnik vs G Meier 1-0332012Dortmund SparkassenD32 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
44. M Bartel vs Caruana 0-1272012Dortmund SparkassenD85 Grunfeld
45. Ponomariov vs Fridman  ½-½332012Dortmund SparkassenD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
 page 2 of 2; games 26-45 of 45  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 12 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-22-12  PinnedPiece: <JB: not a single one of the bottom five has defeated one of the top five yet..>

There was a surprise upset with Bartel beating Ponomariov in rd 6...

Jul-22-12  zluria: Welp, it looks like Caruana has won his game. Bartel sure looked out of his depth here. Anyway, that means he has at least equal first. Does anyone know what the tiebreaks are?
Jul-22-12  zluria: <Jim Bartle> Wrong, Bartel beat Ponomariov. It was his only win.
Jul-22-12  PhilFeeley: So Caruana has won. He'll at least tie for first. Kramnik won't win this year.
Jul-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <PhilFeeley: So Caruana has won. He'll at least tie for first. ***>

On page 5 of this thread can be found this comment (posted after Caruana’s second-round loss to Ponimariov): <Peligroso Patzer: Caruana seems to be off-form in this event. He was a bit lucky to escape with half-a-point yesterday; not so lucky today.>

To the extent there was at least implicit in that comment a prediction how Caruana would fare when the final standings were reckoned, it calls to mind the famous admonition of Sam Goldwyn: “Be very cautious when making predictions, especially about the future.”

Taking that advice to heart, I hereby wish to go on-record with a fearless prediction of Magnus Carlsen to be the winner of the 2012 Tal Memorial. I will even be so bold as to predict Carlsen’s final tournament score to be 5.5/9, half-a-point ahead of Caruana and Radjabov.

Clearly, I possess the gift of clairvoyance, especially as regards the past.

Jul-22-12  zluria: So... Karjakin has a good position versus Gustafsson, simply because White's attack is crashing down while Black's hasn't even gotten going yet. If Car-Jack wins, does he beat Caruana on tiebreaks? How does this work?
Jul-22-12  fisayo123: Seems like after Karjakin's inevitable victory, Caruana would win on number of victories as the tie-break unless Ponomariov wins his game.
Jul-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <fisayo123>: What is your source for the applicable tie-break criteria? (I could not find the official regulations for this event on the offical website: http://translate.google.com/transla...).
Jul-22-12  fisayo123: Here it is:
http://www.sparkassen-chess-meeting...
Jul-22-12  mrbasso: These tiebreak rules in Round-robin tournaments are all complete nonsense anyway. There is nothing better than to Blitz it out.
Jul-22-12  Isbjorn: Meier made a mistake in a worse position and is now losing. Nice for Kramnik to finish with a win.
Jul-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: Thank you, <fisayo123>.

From the table you linked, I infer that the first tie-break criterion is number of games with black, then number of wins, and third Sonneborn-Berger score. Both Ponomariov and Naiditsch had five (5) games each with Black, so if either of them could win today, he would apparently prevail over Caruana.

Jul-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <mrbasso: These tiebreak rules in Round-robin tournaments are all complete nonsense anyway. <There is nothing better than to Blitz it out.>>

Anything is better than resorting to the abomination of blitz for any purpose.

Jul-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <Peligroso Patzer: Thank you, <fisayo123>.

From the table you linked, I infer that the first tie-break criterion is number of games with black, then number of wins, and third Sonneborn-Berger score. *** >

I had initially overlooked the note beneath the standings table you linked, which note provides a basis stronger than inference for the stated conclusion on tie-break rules: "<Bei Gleichstand zählt 1. die Anzahl an Schwarzpartien, 2. die Anzahl an gewonnenen Partien und 3. die Sonneborn-Berger-Wertung.>"

Jul-22-12  mrbasso: The better blitz player is the better chessplayer!
Ask Grischuk...
Jul-22-12  PhilFeeley: It's rare these days for a high level tournament game to go all the way to mate. Thanks to Kramnik & Meier for an entertaining game!
Jul-22-12  Calar: So in likely case that only Karjakin and Caruana finish on 6 points each, Caruana would win 1st place due to 2nd tie-break criterion?
Jul-22-12  parmetd: I disagree Peligroso, blitz is better than Armmageddn. That is the worst tie break!
Jul-22-12  fisayo123: Same thing Peligroso.
Jul-22-12  mrbasso: well, another bad day for the German players. cg to Caruana and Karjakin.
Jul-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: I concede your well-taken point, <parmetd>.

BTW, I do not in the least dispute <mrbasso>'s characterization of round-robin tie-break rules as “complete nonsense”, but seldom can I muster the self-discipline to forgo any opportunity to vituperate blitz, which I do genuinely deplore.

Jul-22-12  jamesmaskell: Does look like it <Calar>, Caruana and Karjakin both had same number of black games but Caruana has scored one more win.
Jul-22-12  fisayo123: Congratulations to wonder-kid Fabiano Caruana on his first Super-Tournament victory! He has had an unbelievable year having played over 100 games and tied for second in Corus and Tal memorial. He is one of the very few teenagers to have won a super-tournament of this kind. Hardwork does pay off and there are few who work harder than Fabiano!
Jul-22-12  Naniwazu: Caruana won! Cash in ticket for 500 chessbucks!
Jul-22-12  csmath: <super-tournament>
Nothing to subtract from Caruana but calling a tournament with Bartel, Gustafsson, Fridman, and Mejer a supertournament is a little bit preposterous.

This is just a strong tournament with few elite players.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 14)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 12 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC