Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing User Profile

Member since Jul-25-06 · Last seen Jan-12-22
no bio
>> Click here to see eblunt's game collections.

   eblunt has kibitzed 434 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Feb-02-21 M Keller vs W Bogatzki, 1976 (replies)
eblunt: If the black king runs, this is not a bog(atzki) standard win for white
   Jan-25-21 P Benes vs Mokry, 1979 (replies)
eblunt: It's so easy it makes a Mokry of a Monday
   Jan-19-21 Mecking vs S Mareco, 2011 (replies)
eblunt: <Brenin> Yes , I agree, OTB if I quickly saw a straightforward way of forcing a win of queen for rook, I would probably take it, rather than risking wasting clock time looking for more
   Sep-02-20 S Azarov vs Nisipeanu, 2011
eblunt: Ne3 is a great move. Looks quiet but does about 3 very threatening things all at once. Opens up the rook on the queen, threatens f5+ , blocks the line to g3. Suddenly black has too many threats to answer.
   May-29-20 Khismatullin vs M Bosiocic, 2010 (replies)
eblunt: <Goodevans> I too missed 28.Rxd6 ! and went for the mundane 28. R(d)f1+ which looked pretty overpowering
   May-05-20 Yermolinsky vs Beliavsky, 1993 (replies)
eblunt: <Landshark> Same here , I saw the mate threat from white, so just saw the easy way to solve the problem and stay a rook up with Qxc4 +
   Apr-20-20 A Kveinys vs Speelman, 2002 (replies)
eblunt: <stacase> same here
   Mar-31-20 Carlsen vs Bu Xiangzhi, 2017 (replies)
eblunt: <OhioChessFan:> I had Rg2 as well. I really don't see what black can do after that. Has to lose the Knight to stop the pawn, and then the rook swap is unavoidable. OK with the bishop it'll be a tedious process of a few moves to finish off but it's a clear win.
   Mar-24-20 Ivkov vs Gufeld, 1964 (replies)
eblunt: Doesn't 28 ♘e4 work just as well ? Was the double rook sac really needed ? I can't see a move that stops 29 ♘e6+ except by losing a lot of material.
   Feb-27-20 Euwe vs Keres, 1940 (replies)
eblunt: <Walter Glattke>: 36.♔d3 ♗f5 mate Isn't it ?
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC