tino72 has kibitzed 182 times to chessgames   [more...]

Aug-02-19 Marshall vs Capablanca, 1910    tino72: @Momentum Man: You are quite right - there would not be an "r" sound - I should have tried to find a better rhyming word than "banger" but I couldn't think of one in English! And there is no umlaut on Lange.      Apr-02-19 Carlsen vs V Cmilyte, 2009    tino72: Lambda - you are missing 33.Qxd7 - that pawn on c6 is no longer there.      Nov-28-18 Carlsen vs Caruana, 2018    tino72: <Jack Kerouac: <Sargon> 'He hands you a nikel, hands you a dime, ask's you with a grin if you're having a good time..'> He's -0.68 but he says he's +0.54....      Dec-20-17 Shabalov vs I Naumkin, 1987    tino72: If you didn't pick Rxh6 then you got the puzzle wrong - no prizes for 2nd or 3rd choice moves.      Jan-12-16 S Thatte vs M Liu, 2013    tino72: I only got as far as move 22: I guess that counts as a fail then :(      Dec-15-14 London Chess Classic (2014)    tino72: Nice literary reference there, Absentee. Let's see now: In the hall the patzers come and go Talking of GM Wesley So.      Dec-09-14 London Chess Classic (Blitz) (2014)    tino72: I know, Mark! I don't put people on ignore just because I disagree with them. That would be childish. Read what I actually said. I'm not trying to stop you posting, or accusing you of breaking any rules - I'm just using my own freedom of expression to disagree with you on one point.      Aug-02-12 World Blitz Championship (2012)    tino72: I'm confused. I looked up this page expecting to see some sort of chat about Grishuk's great result/whatever. Instead, there appear to be countless pages of irelevant effluent about some guy who wasn't even playing. Please could you keep your postings relevant, people?      Jul-06-12 Jan Hein Donner    tino72: Happy birthday Hein Donner. 85 today. The king of chess literature! (People: if you have not yet read "The King" then you are missing out.)      Jul-17-11 Kamsky vs Karjakin, 2011    tino72: <8284> maybe you are right - technically - although I would rate both Smyslov and Botvinnik over 2700 in modern day terms (once you adjust for "rating inflation"/development of chess theory over the last 50 years): Smyslov vs Botvinnik, 1957

indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com. If you need an account, register now; it's quick, anonymous, and free! If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.