Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing User Profile

Member since Aug-18-06 · Last seen Nov-18-16
no bio

   peirce has kibitzed 11 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Dec-17-15 Steinitz vs M Weiss, 1882 (replies)
peirce: Could anybody explain me why Steinitz played 21 Ng4 ? Since the knight is so important in the plan , it should not be touched and put away from the e5 square , it is not even attacked . When a pieces is playng an important role in your plan , don't move , I think it is ...
   Sep-12-15 Nimzowitsch vs Rubinstein, 1926 (replies)
peirce: Hello everybody. I would like to know how much time used Nimzowitsch to conceive and move the 18 th move . I have an hypothesis about the problems which the need of the clock is giving to players. But first , I would like to build my idea on a datum . Is there a way ...
   Sep-14-14 Botvinnik vs Vladimir Borisovich Yuriev, 1927
peirce: The game where , according to Botvinnik, ┬┤Everything resolves around the b-pawn passed┬┤. It is something worthing to be said , it makes thing meaningful.
   May-26-10 ChessBookForum chessforum (replies)
peirce: Are you interested in Ivanchuk games? Then, buy Crouch Modern chess move by move.
   May-09-10 Andre Lilienthal (replies)
peirce: RIP GM Lielentahl . A giant is passed away!
   Nov-04-09 Steinitz vs Blackburne, 1876 (replies)
peirce: I have a doubt . Let s say that I got the idea of the weaknesses of the black squares . Steinitz needed Blackburne to play 14 ... g6 in order to create the weaknesses I already said before. But there is no certanity about it. I mean Steinitz could not really be ...
   Feb-22-09 Fischer vs Fine, 1963 (replies)
peirce: To FSR : all right , but the real problem is this Fine s book the psycology of the chess player is so annoyng to the average chess player that I can t help to have a negative attitude toward Fine .
   Feb-10-09 Ahues vs C Carls, 1921 (replies)
peirce: I would propose the move 12 N*e6 , later comes: f*e6 f4f5 adding pressure on e6 square . But later I also another reply I missed before: B*e6 . what do you think about the move i said ?
   Feb-02-09 Staunton vs Horwitz, 1851 (replies)
peirce: There are some details i would like to check . 45 Be5 is not a mistake I mean an illegal move but it doesn t work due to tempi. The move is made in order to decoy the Black Queen , right? So that White can deliver mate. But Black has still the way to bring the ...
   Jan-22-09 R Iglesias vs Capablanca, 1893 (replies)
peirce: 34 K*g7 is a mistake , an illegal move , there is a Rook in f1 .
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC