peirce has kibitzed 11 times to chessgames   [more...]

Dec-17-15 Steinitz vs M Weiss, 1882    peirce: Could anybody explain me why Steinitz played 21 Ng4 ? Since the knight is so important in the plan , it should not be touched and put away from the e5 square , it is not even attacked . When a pieces is playng an important role in your plan , don't move , I think it is ...      Sep-12-15 A Nimzowitsch vs Rubinstein, 1926    peirce: Hello everybody. I would like to know how much time used Nimzowitsch to conceive and move the 18 th move . I have an hypothesis about the problems which the need of the clock is giving to players. But first , I would like to build my idea on a datum . Is there a way ...      Sep-14-14 Botvinnik vs V Yuriev, 1927   peirce: The game where , according to Botvinnik, ´Everything resolves around the b-pawn passed´. It is something worthing to be said , it makes thing meaningful.      May-26-10 ChessBookForum chessforum    peirce: Are you interested in Ivanchuk games? Then, buy Crouch Modern chess move by move.      May-09-10 Andre Lilienthal    peirce: RIP GM Lielentahl . A giant is passed away!      Nov-04-09 Steinitz vs Blackburne, 1876    peirce: I have a doubt . Let s say that I got the idea of the weaknesses of the black squares . Steinitz needed Blackburne to play 14 ... g6 in order to create the weaknesses I already said before. But there is no certanity about it. I mean Steinitz could not really be ...      Feb-22-09 Fischer vs Fine, 1963    peirce: To FSR : all right , but the real problem is this Fine s book the psycology of the chess player is so annoyng to the average chess player that I can t help to have a negative attitude toward Fine .      Feb-10-09 C Ahues vs C Carls, 1921    peirce: I would propose the move 12 N*e6 , later comes: f*e6 f4f5 adding pressure on e6 square . But later I also another reply I missed before: B*e6 . what do you think about the move i said ?      Feb-02-09 Staunton vs Horwitz, 1851    peirce: There are some details i would like to check . 45 Be5 is not a mistake I mean an illegal move but it doesn t work due to tempi. The move is made in order to decoy the Black Queen , right? So that White can deliver mate. But Black has still the way to bring the ...      Jan-22-09 R Iglesias vs Capablanca, 1893    peirce: 34 K*g7 is a mistake , an illegal move , there is a Rook in f1 .

indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com. If you need an account, register now; it's quick, anonymous, and free! If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.