Dec-09-23 Lilienthal vs Alatortsev, 1944
| |
| Stolzenberg: 9. c3 = Capablanca vs R T Black, 1918 |
|
|
|
Dec-08-23 Janowski vs J S Morrison, 1918
| |
| Stolzenberg: <39. ... g5>: Activity in a bad position! 39. ... Rb7 would have been more cautious. <40. ... Rd8> allowed the c-pawn to move on. Black should have considered 40. ... Rb6. <42. ... h5> weakened the 5th rank! Black should have preferred 42. ... Kd6. <44. ... ... |
|
|
|
Dec-06-23 O Chajes vs Marshall, 1918
| |
| Stolzenberg: <9. Be3> was solid and cautious, but 9. d5 exd5 10. cxd5 Nb4 11. Qd4 would have been more active. <10. Qd2> was not the best move. 10. b3 (protecting c4) Bf6 11. Ne4 would have been better. Instead of <12. Rad1> White shoud have considered 12. f4, preventing ... |
|
|
|
Jun-02-23 Spielmann vs Chigorin, 1906
| |
| Stolzenberg: <JG27Pyth>: ... finds white's opening play suspect from move 4 on ... . <4. f4> was indeed a bad move. Instead White should have developed his knights first of all. <4. Nc3> = Vienna Game (C28) or <4. Nf3> = Two Knights Defense (C55) by transposition. |
|
|
|
May-28-23 H Buehler vs Lasker, 1916
| |
| Stolzenberg: or 25. ... Qc8 |
|
|
|
May-24-23 Lasker vs W Henneberger, 1916
| |
| Stolzenberg: Targeting g7 with <10. Qg3> was too hungry. Instead 10. c4 would have been the right move here. |
|
|
|
May-23-23 Queen's Pawn Game (D00)
| |
| Stolzenberg: It seems that nobody ever tried the extraordinary <Zurich Gambit 1. d4 d5 2. g4>. It is not correct of course, but it will surprise the opponent because it is so far away from the usual variations! |
|
|
|
May-23-23 Lasker vs W Preiswerk, 1916
| |
| Stolzenberg: Twice <... Rd1>. Twice nice! |
|
|
|
May-21-23 S Rosenthal vs J Wisker, 1871
| |
| Stolzenberg: Resigning after <45. Kd4> would have been more polite. |
|
|
|
May-21-23 Capablanca vs O Chajes, 1918
| |
| Stolzenberg: The blunder <42. ... Bxe5+?> lost immediately, but also after 42. ... Qe6 43. Kf4 or 42. ... Qf8 43. Rxa7 Black would loose the game sooner or later. |
|
|
|
|
Kibitzing
