Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Chessgames premium membership fee will increase to $39 per year effective June 15, 2023. Enroll Now!

Number of games in database: 75
Years covered: 1837 to 1946

Overall record: +3 -45 =3 (8.8%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 24 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

With the White pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (7) 
    C62 C77 C78 C66 C79
With the Black pieces:
 Giuoco Piano (5) 
    C50 C54
 King's Gambit Accepted (4) 
 Evans Gambit (4) 
    C51 C52
 Vienna Opening (4) 
    C25 C26
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Lasker / Wolf vs Allies, 1934 0-1
   F Amelung vs Allies, 1898 0-1
   Steinitz vs Allies, 1880 0-1
   Allies vs Lasker, 1907

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Allies
Search Google for Allies


[what is this?]
Generally known as the plural of NN, he or she or they are generally the founders of the consultation & team chess methods of play.

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 78  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. A Petrov vs Allies 1-0271837RUS corrC43 Petrov, Modern Attack
2. Saint-Amant vs Allies  1-0211846Consultation gameC23 Bishop's Opening
3. Allies vs Saint-Amant 0-1571846Consultation gameB20 Sicilian
4. Harrwitz vs Allies 1-0251848BrightonC51 Evans Gambit
5. Allies vs Staunton  0-1451852Consultation gameC44 King's Pawn Game
6. Staunton vs Allies  1-0381852Consultation gameB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
7. Allies vs Staunton 0-1331852Consultation odds gameA40 Queen's Pawn Game
8. Staunton vs Allies  1-0201853Consultation odds gameC52 Evans Gambit
9. Allies vs Staunton  1-0381853Consultation game000 Chess variants
10. Allies vs Saint-Amant  0-1381855Paris consultC55 Two Knights Defense
11. Allies vs Paulsen 0-1181858Blindfold consultation simul, 2bC58 Two Knights
12. Morphy vs Allies 1-0221859Consultation gameC70 Ruy Lopez
13. Allies vs NN 1-0241861LondonC50 Giuoco Piano
14. Staunton vs Allies 1-0421865Consultation gameC51 Evans Gambit
15. Zukertort vs Allies 1-0401869BerlinC51 Evans Gambit
16. Allies vs Dadian / Marcoran 0-1351882Consultation gameC37 King's Gambit Accepted
17. Chigorin vs Allies 1-0531884HarkovC25 Vienna
18. George Walton / Rosario Aspa vs Allies  1-0201887Consultation gameC25 Vienna
19. S Rosenthal vs Allies 1-0161887BlindfoldC52 Evans Gambit
20. Allies vs Steinitz 0-1241888HavanaC62 Ruy Lopez, Old Steinitz Defense
21. Allies vs Chigorin  0-1311891HavanaC52 Evans Gambit
22. Allies vs Chigorin  0-1461891HavanaD02 Queen's Pawn Game
23. Allies vs Em. Lasker / L Lasek 0-1221891Consultation gameC47 Four Knights
24. Allies vs Chigorin 0-1531892Consultation gameC45 Scotch Game
25. Allies vs Blackburne 0-1241893ConsultationC31 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit
 page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 78  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Allies wins | Allies loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-05-05  howardtheduck: <OJC>
What an interesting link that was. I'm always amazed by human prowess and that was such a case!

chess is a fun game to play and i guess i will have more time to play when i'm retired...

Jul-05-05  Montreal1666: <rochade18:> <"Beratende" is not a chess player, but a German word. Something like consultation, advisory partners, I can't give a better explanation.>

Where do you see the word "Beratende" here?

<Thanks. Well call them "allies.">

You call what Allies?

Can someone explain in clear terms what does the player named "Allies" represent?

Jul-05-05  Darklight: <Can someone explain in clear terms what does the player named "Allies" represent?> a team of players
Aug-07-05  Autoreparaturwerkbau: Its funny that "allies" never managed to draw in 38 games ...
Nov-23-05  EmperorAtahualpa: With the new game added to the database, it looks like <Knight13> was right after all.....106 years!
Dec-02-06  gauer: chessgames: are these guys the same player as this guy below: ?
Dec-02-06  Karpova: A great chessplayer but virtually forgotten nowadays. The proof: His best game is not even included in the database. It was against Axis, a strong european player...
Premium Chessgames Member
  technical draw: <Karpova> Axis was a team composed of European and Asian players.
Dec-04-06  Eyal: <technical draw> Allies was a team too - joined in the middlegame by a strong Russian player (who helped Axis in the opening).
Dec-04-06  Archives: Im sorry guys, but I'm finding it hard to read in between the lines here.
Dec-04-06  arifattar: <Allies was a team too> with the American players joining in later.
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: ...tip the veal, try the waitresses. I'm here all week.
Sep-25-08  Katu: 111 years in the world of chess with a 7% total efficiency? He should have retired long ago LOL.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Only three wins, but two are against Marshall and Lasker. That has to count for something.

Many of the losses appear to be from simuls, but we all know that when great players give simuls, only their losses get published. And just look at some of the masters they allowed to play!

In addition, they have a perfect record against NN, which definitely puts them in the caliber of Greco, at least.

Feb-28-09  YoungEd: How would the Allies do against the Axis?
Mar-04-09  WhiteRook48: <Allies> vs <Axis> 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3 Bb5+ Bd7 4 Bxd7+ Nxd7 5 g3 cxd4 6 Nxd4 a6
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Are Allied teams allowed in modern simultaneous exhibitions? It seems that this was the case pre-World War 2, according to the games in the database.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Well at least Allies did better than NN.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: The <Allies> ponder their next move:

Evidently, the officials were not amused:

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Can someone give me a simple explanation of how Allies play a game of chess?

The way I see it, there is one board with one player on one side of the board and two on the other.

The Allies talk to each other aloud, saying things like, "Let's play the Sicilian because I know he hates that," and "If we play ...Rxh5 he might miss the mate in 2" and "We have to pray he doesn't play Qg2 because we'll have to resign after that."

Of course the Allies have the advantage of being able to analyse twice as deep as the opponent: "Let's analyse Bxh2, you memorise the white moves and I'll analyse the black moves... GO!"

If talking is not feasible, for example if an opera is in progress, then I suppose the players use hand signals or written notes.

Does anyone know the full procedure?

Dec-10-17  Magpye: Yes. Separate rooms.

Sometimes consulting teams of players play against another team of players. If those are four man teams, you would have eight roosters all trying to crow over the others.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Magpye: Yes. Separate rooms.>

Here is a picture of a consultation game in progress. At least in this case they are in one room.

Dec-11-17  Magpye: is it a consultation game, or are they analyzing a game together?
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Riiight. So has anyone got any sensible ideas about how Allies played a consultation game?
Premium Chessgames Member
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC