Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

page 1 of 18; games 1-25 of 440  Game   Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening 1. W Pollock vs Bird   0-1 53 1885 1st BCA Congress B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 2. F Walker vs A W Fox   1-0 33 1901 Casual game B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 3. W H Jonas vs W J Miles 1-0 31 1901 New South Wales Championship B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 4. J Mortimer vs Von Popiel   0-1 31 1902 Monte Carlo B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 5. H Bogdanor vs Arthur John Spencer   1-0 37 1914 BCF-ch Major Open B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 6. E Schultz vs Alekhine 0-1 33 1914 Simul, 24b B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 7. S Mlotkowski vs E Gruer   1-0 58 1917 Off-hand Game B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 8. A J Fink vs R Carlyle   1-0 33 1952 53rd US Open B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 9. P Morrell vs R Ault   0-1 17 1959 60th US Open B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 10. A Khasin vs H Luik   1-0 21 1960 URS-ch sf Rostov-on-Don B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 11. A Kofman vs Gufeld   1-0 34 1960 Avantgard-ch B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 12. Suetin vs Kholmov   ½-½ 50 1960 URS-ch sf Rostov-on-Don B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 13. John W Jaffray vs R Ault   0-1 34 1960 61st US Open B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 14. J Sherwin vs Bisguier   ½-½ 51 1960 61st US Open B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 15. J Marsalek vs M Ujtelky   ½-½ 17 1961 Czechoslovak Championship B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 16. S Handsuren vs L Lane   0-1 40 1961 Vrnjacka Banja ct (Women) B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 17. A Bannik vs A Roizman   ½-½ 25 1962 URS-chT B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 18. B Lebedev vs Shamkovich   1-0 41 1963 URS Spartakiad B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 19. Boleslavsky vs B Shashin   0-1 38 1963 Burevestnik CC-ch B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 20. I Somogyi vs L Navarovszky   ½-½ 19 1963 Hungarian Championship B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 21. G Moehring vs F Baumbach   1-0 25 1964 East German Championship B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 22. J Bednarski vs F Baumbach   0-1 29 1964 DSV-Turnier 01st B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 23. A Novopashin vs Gufeld   0-1 33 1964 Ukrainian Team Championship B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 24. Suetin vs Gufeld   0-1 47 1964 URS B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4 25. Ivkov vs Larsen 0-1 37 1964 Hoogovens B35 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Modern Variation with Bc4  page 1 of 18; games 1-25 of 440

REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)

Aug-13-03    Benjamin Lau: <Sicilian Experts> I've been taught that in the Sicilian, white should not play Nxc6 because is strenghtens black's center. But one thing though- does Nxc6 bxc6 close up the c-file? Isn't that bad for black in a way? Aug-13-03    xu fei: <Benjamin Lau> Nxc6 bxc6 in the sicilian often strengthens the center, but it also allows a Maroczy bind of sorts with Na4, c4, and Nc3, cramping up the black center. this is why some prefer to recapture with Bxc6 when possible. On the topic of the c-file, i don't see why the b-file wouldn't be as good as the c-file. An open file is an open file, after all. Aug-13-03    Benjamin Lau: <Xu Fei> I guess you're right, but I still like my c-files more... :) Mar-06-04    731: The c-file and the f-file are the optimal open files in my opinion. Mostly because a short castle places the rook directly in the f-file and because a rook on the c-file is often exerting extra pressure on c3 backed up with the kings bishop from g7, a piece exchange at c4 is good too, getting the rook into play. I don't like Nxc6 or Bxc6 very much so this is why I play the hyperaccelerated dragon (e4-c5, Nf3-g6) instead of the usual accelerated. Mar-06-04    BiLL RobeRTiE: Exchanging your light-squared bishop for a knight on c6 is a major positional error in the Open Sicilian (generally). Nxc6, although also somewhat dubious positionally, does allow the follow-up e5 (in the Accelerated), forcing ...Ng8 in response. For example: 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Bg7 6. Nxc6!? bxc6 7. e5 Ng8 8. Bc4 (idea Qf3, forcing a weakening of the Black kingside). This particular idea has scored very well in practice. Another Sicilian that the Nxc6-e5 idea comes up in is the Four Knights variation. Of course 6. Nxc6 in response to the Sveshnikov is ridiculous because the e5 advance is not possible. Mar-06-04    Benjamin Lau: Robertie, 731, nice analysis. I asked the question a very long time ago and since have come up with my own solution- to simply not play the knight to c6 until it is possible to recapture with a bishop on d7 or a queen on c7. The problem rarely shows up now however since I don't play lines with the Sicilian in which the knight is placed on c6; now I played the Kan in which ...Nbd7 is almost always preferable. Jul-14-04    rochade18: <Exchanging your light-squared bishop for a knight on c6 is a major positional error in the Open Sicilian (generally)> BiLL RobeRTie, do you want to say that the Rossolimo with 4.Bxc6 is bad for white? Aug-16-04    tomh72000: Is the Rossolimo an <open> Sicilian? I would say no, but perhaps I am wrong... Jun-20-05    vampiero: what are the moves of the Rossolimo Jun-20-05    Chessical: <Vampiero> http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches... Jun-20-05    vampiero: oh i know this one, but for me it just usually transforms into the canal-sokolovsky attack with the Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 moves that tend to follow in my games Jun-20-05    pyryk: Actually 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bb5+ is, I think, known as the Moscow variation. In the Rossolimo Black plays 2...Nc6 instead of 2...d6. Jun-20-05    vampiero: i understand that d5 is still the main breaking point in the accelarated. but in this variation, how can d5 be a breaking point to? perhaps a pawn sacrifice to open up the b-file?? for example after Bc4 b4 Bxb4 a3 Bc4 Rb8 followed by Qb6 Jun-20-05    aw1988: What is this "Accelerated Fianchetto with Bc4" nonsense? Isn't this just a Dragon? Jun-20-05    refutor: <aw1988> hasn't moved the d-pawn yet Jun-20-05    aw1988: Does it make a big difference? Well, I was only asking for the technical term. Thank you. Jun-20-05    refutor: it does make a big difference, because black is attempting to hold back on pushing the d-pawn, and attempting to play it to "d5" in one move instead of two...that is one of the main ideas in the "accelerated" dragon. if black eventually plays ...d6 it transposes into the dragon, usually :) Dec-04-11    refutor: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 i'm not a master theoretician <anymore :)> but why can't black just play an accelerated dragon while avoiding the maroczy bind...assuming you don't like to face the maroczy bind Aug-09-12    fisayo123: <refutor> Its white who binds here. Aug-09-12    Marmot PFL: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 <i'm not a master theoretician <anymore :)> but why can't black just play an accelerated dragon while avoiding the maroczy bind...assuming you don't like to face the maroczy bind> That's playable but unpleasant for black after either 6 Nxc6 bc 7 e5 Ng8 8 Bc4 or 6 Nxc6 dc 7 Qxd8+ Kxe8 8 Bc4, both with initiative for white. Aug-09-12    fisayo123: <marmot PFL> This is why black must mix up his move order by playing <4..g6 5. Nc3 Bg7 6.Be3 Nf6 7.Nxc6 bxc6 8.e5 Ng8 9.f4 Nh6! 10.Qd2 0-0 11.0-0-0 d6!>, (with black gaining the initiative with a pseudo-pawn "sac" where white is forced to capture; black wins thew pawn back eventually and stands much better in the end-game. My main point is that its white who plays the maroczy bind with 5.c4. So in essence black can't <<<avoid>>> the Marcozy in the mainlines of the accelerated dragon :)

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members. Nothing in violation of United States law. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members. No trolling. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times. See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator. NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific opening only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC