chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Alireza Firouzja vs Radoslaw Wojtaszek
Tata Steel Masters (2021), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 13, Jan-31
Zukertort Opening: Queen Pawn Defense (A06)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Firouzja/Wojtaszek game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-31-21  Damenlaeuferbauer: I have to concede, that I am not a Firouzja fan and think, he will never play a match for the classical world championship, but if it is true, that the organizers and/or arbiters told him and R. Wojtaszek after move 55 or so to LEAVE the stage and finish this game in ANOTHER ROOM, because they need the stage for the BLITZ tiebreak between two DUTCH players, this would be an eternal shame for the tournament of Wijk aan Zee. The organizers and/or arbiters disturbed a CLASSICAL game at the edge of a knife after nearly 6 hours and stole A. Firouzja a shared FIRST PLACE (he blundered with 58.Qg3? in time pressure) because of a f...ing BLITZ tiebreak. If A. Firouzja is a man with principles, he will never play the tournament of Wijk aan Zee again. I hope, he will beat every Dutch player in the future.
Jan-31-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: Tiebreak Rules

In case two players share first place in the Masters (if more players share the first prize, the first two players will be selected according to the criteria as stated below), they will play a tie-break after the last round, on Sunday 31, January 2021. The time control for two Blitz games is 5 min + 3 sec and possible Armageddon in the third game (White has 5 minutes and Black 4 minutes, + 3 seconds increment as of move 60). Drawing of lots will be provided by the Chief Arbiter. A tie-break will start at 18.00 hours sharp.

<If other games are still in progress then, they will be moved to a different section within De Moriaan, where they will be continued. The Chief Arbiter will decide when these games will be moved and players are expected to abide by this decision.>

All players agreed to these rules before the tournament.

Jan-31-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Who reads the terms and conditions?
Jan-31-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Seemed like such a shame that they agreed to a draw in the final position because the game is anything but dead. However, knowing the circumstances as outlined by <Stonehenge>, it makes sense; they might have felt annoyed by the treatment (even if they had agreed to the terms beforehand) and drew out of spite.
Jan-31-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  0ZeR0: Yes, it's a shame they didn't play this one out, but the game was still quite interesting. I for one like young Alireza. His games are generally quite exciting even when they end in a draw.
Jan-31-21  fabelhaft: <The all-Dutch playoff was scheduled to start at 18:10, two tables away from Firouzja-Wojtaszek, who were still playing. When these players reached the time control, the arbiters asked them to move to one of the tables farther away so that they would be less bothered by the moves of Giri and Van Foreest.

Firouzja was visibly disturbed (understandably so) and refused to leave the table. While the playoff was underway, he spoiled his promising position, and afterward, he was very angry at the arbiters and shouted at the main organizer>

https://www.chess.com/news/view/jor...

Feb-01-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: According to that version of events - and it's definitely correct that the players had reached the time control at move 60 (hence Alireza didn't blunder on move 58 because of the commotion) - the organisers were i) not seeking to move the players off-stage and ii) were trying to help not hinder them.
Feb-01-21  joeld: "The Chief Arbiter will decide when these games will be moved... and players are expected to abide by this decision"

People's criticisms are against the arbiters for deciding that the game had to be moved at that time, not against Firouzja that he didn't abide by the arbiter's decision."

Feb-01-21  Z4all: <joeld> can you please supply the context for your quote - a link to your source would be helpful.

The context could be relevant, e.g. the arbiter's decision to move the game could be referring to a new game, and not necessarily a game-in-progress.

Feb-02-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Firoujza either missed the win with 52 d5 exd5 53 exd5 or was worried that 53 ...Qd6 might be tough to crack , because 53...Bxd5 54 Bxd5 Rd5 fails to 55 Bxg7+ Kxg7 56 Qg4+ winning a rook.

After 53...Qd6 there is no decisive sacrifice, but SF gives white +2 with an improved version of what happened in the game.

A few moves later, when the arbiters interrupted the players, the opportunity for this advance was gone

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Chaos Controversy etc...
from Great chess draws by CRAZYGOD
Zukertort Opening: Queen Pawn Def (A06) 1/2-1/2 Dutch dung
from DRAWS Collections Enlarged by Fredthebear by fredthebear
0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 5
by 0ZeR0

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC