Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Frederic S Anderson vs Weaver Adams
42nd US Open. Championship (1941), St. Louis, MO USA, rd 6, Jul-24
Modern Defense: Mongredien Defense (B06)  ·  1-0



explore this opening
find similar games 222 more games of W Adams
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "B06"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Winner of the brilliancy prize. Several players were experimenting with double fianchetto defenses at this tournament, but it doesn't seem to fit Adams' style.
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <PB> Are you sure Adams was Black in this tilt? (laughs)

You are quite right: this sort of stuff hardly seemed to be Adams' meat and potatoes, to put it mildly.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: The writer in "Chess Review" (August/September 1941) did not agree with the choice of this game for the brilliancy prize.

<"Against Anderson the taciturn Bostonian played a weak "Fianchetto Defense", was soundly trounced in 17 moves. This game was awarded the brilliancy prize. Anderson certainly played well. took full advantage of Black's weak opening, but the complete lack of resistance made brilliancy neither necessary nor possible.">

And Matthew Green commenting on the game:

<"This defense has been seen once of twice in the last three decades. It will probably be seen even less in the future.">

To which I can only add that Tournament Director L. Walter Stephens, who donated the prizes, also did the judging. (Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 9/4/1941).

Apr-01-15  Petrosianic: L. Walter Stephens, of course, being the corrupt tournament official who gave a win to Reshevsky a year later, in a game he knew Reshevsky hadn't really won.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Corrupt is, I think, too strong. Imperious, yes. Incompetent, probably. But everything done with the best of motives.
Apr-01-15  Granny O Doul: What motive? His personal infallibility doctrine? I'd say "corrupt" was a mild choice of adjective.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Apparently, we have different ideas of what "corrupt" implies in this situation. To my mind, being "corrupt" would have meant that Stephens ruled against Denker out of personal antagonism or out of favoritism for Reshevsky.

But that appears not to have been the case. Stephens simply made a bad ruling, then refused to even consider the possibility of a mistake. That's a man who is simply out of his depth and too conceited to admit if.

It's interesting that, three rounds before the Reshevsky game, Stephens had made another questionable decision, this time in Denker's favor, even though the latter may have been at fault.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Mongredien Def/Hippo (B06) 1-0 Central sac attack for prize
from A Players in Fredthebear's Older Audience by fredthebear
Final, Round 6 (Thursday, July 24): ACB 85; CR:150
from US Open 1941, St. Louis by Phony Benoni
August / September, p. 150 [Game 81 / 1664]
from Chess Review 1941 by Phony Benoni
Mongredien Def/Hippo (B06) 1-0 Central sac attack for prize
from A B C Players of Yesteryear Stan by fredthebear
Chess Miniatures, Collection XV
by wwall
Mongredien Def/Hippo (B06) 1-0 Central sac attack for prize
from Decoy to, Deflect from, Remove Fredthebear 4 by trh6upsz
Chess Miniatures, Collection XV
by Okavango
Mongredien Def/Hippo (B06) 1-0 Central sac attack for prize
from Seventeens Spo by Littlejohn
Mongredien Def/Hippo (B06) 1-0 Central sac attack for prize
from 99y TJoker's KP Laughed at FTB's Remarks Jack by dheerajmohan

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC