chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Jan Smeets vs Ruslan Ponomariov
Tata Steel Group A (2011), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 3, Jan-17
French Defense: Winawer. Classical Variation (C18)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Smeets/Ponomariov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-17-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: During the game I was looking at 16.Rac1 (or maybe the other rook) instead of Nxd4. Would that have been any good?
Jan-17-11  TheRavenPK: <Stonehenge> After a 5 second analysis I think Black can after 16.Rac1 play for example 16..Qxc4 17.Rxc4 Ne2+ 18.Khi Nxg3+ 19 hxg3
or 16..Nxf3 17.gxf3 (17.Qxf3 Qxe5 18.Rfe1, but black stays pawn up)..

anyway, I think White can achieve nothing more on 16th move than stay pawn down..

Jan-17-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: Thanks, I had a feeling something was wrong with Rc1 but I just didn't see it.
Jan-17-11  TheRavenPK: Btw, nice example of a won opposite bishop endgame.. Black a2-pawn cannot be taken and Black has all the time in the world to come here with his king, win the White bishop and the game..
Jan-17-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: I didn't understand 22.a4, why make that pawn more vulnerable? But I'm no GM ofcourse :)
Jan-17-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: <Smeets>: "I played 14. c4 with the idea to follow up with 16. Rc1 after 14. …dxc4 15. Bxc4 Nxd4. Then I noticed, however, that 16. … Qxc4! 17. Rxc4 Ne2+ would be winning, not for me, alas, but for black. So I had to settle for 16. Nxd4, just losing the pawn".
Jan-17-11  notyetagm: J Smeets vs Ponomariov, 2011

<TheRavenPK: Stonehenge After a 5 second analysis I think Black can after <<<16.Rac1 play for example 16..Qxc4 17.Rxc4 Ne2+ 18.Khi Nxg3+ 19 hxg3>>> or 16..Nxf3 17.gxf3 (17.Qxf3 Qxe5 18.Rfe1, but black stays pawn up)..>

You missed <THE STING IN THE TAIL>.

(VARIATION)
19 h2x♘g3


click for larger view

19 ... ♗e8-b5 <skewer: c4,f1>


click for larger view

So if White insists on playing 16 ♖a1-c1??, he loses an *additional* exchange to the <REMOVAL OF THE GUARD> tactic 16 ... ♕c7x♗c4!.

Jan-17-11  notyetagm: Game Collection: THE UNDERRATED REMOVAL OF THE GUARD -- Heisman

J Smeets vs Ponomariov, 2011 16 ... Qc7xNc4! destroys c4-bishop defender of e2-royal fork sq

Jan-17-11  notyetagm: Game Collection: DISCOVERED ATTACK!

J Smeets vs Ponomariov, 2011 15 ... Nc6xd4! wins pawn by discovery on undef White c4-bishop

Jan-17-11  notyetagm: http://www.tatasteelchess.com/tourn...

<Jan Smeets spoiled a fine performance in the tournament so far when he made a serious mistake early in his French game against Ruslan Ponomariov of the Ukraine. Playing white, Smeets sacrificed a pawn in the hope of obtaining good chances only to discover –too late- that he had just squandered a fine position. <<<“I played (see diagram)


click for larger view

. c4 with the idea to follow up with 16. Tc1 after 14. …dxc4 15. Lxc4 Pxd4. Then I noticed, however, that 16. … Qxd4! 17. Rxc4 Ne2+ would be winning, not for me, alas, but for black. So I had to settle for 16. Nxd4, just losing the pawn.”>>> Ponomariov eagerly rose to the opportunity, exchanging queens and easily winning the end game at his 40th.>

So the 16 ♖a1-c1?? line involves the tactics 15 ... ♘c6xd4! <DISCOVERED ATTACK>, 16 ... ♕c7x♗c4! <REMOVE THE GUARD>, and 17 ... ♘d4-e2+ <ROYAL FORK>.

A lovely tactical sequence, showcasing the power of a <CENTRALIZED KNIGHT>.

Jan-17-11  notyetagm: Game Collection: CENTRALIZED KNIGHT

J Smeets vs Ponomariov, 2011 16 .. Qc7xBc4! destroys defender of e2-base for Black d4-knight

Jan-18-11  TheRavenPK: <notyetagm> Nice, I admit I didn't see it.. thank you, but still my line is winning :D yes, I did NOT see it further, but still I think I deserve at least... let's say 70% :P
Jan-19-11  Chesschatology: <The RavenPK> Credit deserved, you <ANALYSED> a <VARIATION> with a correct <ASSESSMENT> which <NotyetaGM> supplemented with a <TACTICAL FINESSE> using his system of <CAPITALISED CATEGORIES> to systematically label every <TACTICAL MOTIF>. What a splendid example of <GROUP ANALYSIS>.
Jan-19-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: Well, after 16.RFc1 Qxc4 17.Rxc4 Ne2+ 18.Kh1 Nxg3+ 19.hxg3 white doesn't lose the exchange. But his position is still nothing to Twitter home about.
Feb-04-11  ReikiMaster: 14.c4 looks like an unforced error.
Feb-25-11  Manuel G. Vergara: What is the idea behind 10. ..Nge7? Please update me. hehe

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
16 ... Qc7xNc4! destroys c4-bishop defender of e2-royal fork sq
from THE UNDERRATED REMOVAL OF THE GUARD -- HEISMAN by notyetagm
15 ... Nc6xd4! wins pawn by discovery on undef White c4-bishop
from DISCOVERED ATTACK! by notyetagm
Recent French Winawer games
by cuppajoe
Classical
from C18 French: Winawer [Black] by JoseTigranTalFischer
Classical
from C18 French: Winawer [Black] by chess.master
15 ... Nc6xd4! wins pawn by discovery on undef White c4-bishop
from DISCOVERED ATTACK! by kishchess
16 ... Qc7xNc4! destroys c4-bishop defender of e2-royal fork sq
from THE UNDERRATED REMOVAL OF THE GUARD -- HEISMAN by Jaredfchess
16 ... Qc7xNc4! destroys c4-bishop defender of e2-royal fork sq
from THE UNDERRATED REMOVAL OF THE GUARD -- HEISMAN by Baby Hawk
Classical
from C18 French: Winawer [Black] by nakul1964
Classical
from C18 French: Winawer [Black] by nakul1964
16 ... Qc7xNc4! destroys c4-bishop defender of e2-royal fork sq
from THE UNDERRATED REMOVAL OF THE GUARD -- HEISMAN by trh6upsz

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC