chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
NN vs Francois Philidor
"Pawns Towards the Centre" (game of the day Mar-28-2010)
Analyse du jeu des Échecs (1749) (other), ?
Philidor Defense: Lopez Countergambit (C41)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Francois Philidor.

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 14 more NN/Philidor games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-01-11  bronkenstein: <jbtigerwolf: I don't think the game is really over. Can someone please point out the win?>

When the attacked white bishop moves , black will take g2 pawn with check , and then several more pawns, even threatening mates in some variations while already having decisive material advantage . No point in playing on , therefore white resigned.

Feb-07-12  Knight13: So what exactly did White do wrong prior to move 20? Would 5. exf5 really make that big of a difference?
Feb-07-12  Shams: <Knight13> I'll offer a thought. One answer to your question is that White didn't stake enough of a claim to the center.

Just look at the position after Black's 8...Bd6:


click for larger view

White's game already stinks because Black can easily deal with White's only meaningful stab at the center, c2-c4. White's Knights are atrocious. If he drifts some more, White could be strategically lost in a few moves. How did this happen?

White didn't ask enough of his d- and e-pawns. He captured away from the center with exf5, but this is timid when combined with White's d2-d3. More typical and more effective is usually to capture away and then hit out with pawn to d4, in one go if possible.

Happily the only other game in the db in this line sees Anderssen handling the White pieces 129 years later, and he does what I just described. His opponent seems not to have been very strong, so White's play makes a strong first impression. Play through that game a few times.

Anderssen vs K Pitschel, 1878

~

<newzild><18...e4! is the star move, opening lines and creating an outpost for the knight. Reasonably obvious to anyone familiar with Nimzowitsch, but I'm amazed that Philidor was au fait with the concept.>

Is this the first known game with this canonical pawn sacrifice?

Feb-07-12  Shams: Is the text to be preferred over 11...Be6 keeping the bishop?
Feb-07-12  Knight13: <Shams: More typical and more effective is usually to capture away and then hit out with pawn to d4, in one go if possible.> Are you implying that White's correct line of play would be 6. d4 e4 7. Qe2 Qe7 8. Nfd2 d5 9. Bb3 Nf6 10. c3 ? I like your lucid analysis and explanation, by the way!

<Shams: Is the text to be preferred over 11...Be6 keeping the bishop?> 11... Be6 12. f4 and if 12... e4 then 13. dxe4 dxe4 14. Nxe4 and White wins a pawn. So 12. f4 exf4 13. Qxe7+ Bxe7 14. Bxf4 and White has succeeded in cracking the center. My answer would be that, yes, the text is to be preferred over 11... Be6.

Feb-07-12  Shams: <Knight13> Thanks, I appreciate that. <Are you implying that White's correct line of play would be 6. d4...> Not at all, just that if <exf5/d4> is how White wants to treat the center, he should plan his entire opening around those pawn moves, more or less. Whether he plays them at moves 5/6 or 10/11 depends.

Note the prep moves that Anderssen makes and the ones he doesn't. Why was Anderssen apparently unwilling to abide ...Bf5-g4? He played 8.h3/9.exf5/10.d4. If you want to play 6.d4 in the above position without Anderssen's prepatory h2-h3, can you justify it? These are the questions I ask myself.

On 11...Be6 12.f4 0-0-0 was the move I intended:


click for larger view

Unless Black gets in trouble on the e-file he should be better.

Feb-08-12  Knight13: <Shams> Understood. Thanks, again! :)
Feb-20-12  waustad: I'd love to see Nimzo's take on this. A lot of the terminology wasn't really there before My System, though in some form Philidor considered some of the issues.
Feb-20-12  RookFile: I've play these Latvian systems every time if I knew white would play timidly with d3 and exf5.
Dec-11-12  Damonkeyboy: Why does he sound like a 18th century version of nimzowitsch? Im pretty sure I saw pawn chains and blockades explained right there.
Jan-08-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sebastian88: This is the third game in his book. He give 3 variations of this game. (The first variation is here: NN vs Philidor, 1790)
Aug-19-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 21.Rf6? was a bit too optimistic as black could play 21...d3! 22.Bxd3 (22.Rxg6 dxe2 is apparently hopeless) 22...Bc5+ 23.Kh1 Qg4 (diagram)


click for larger view

White cannot avoid heavy loss of material.

Sep-25-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: Instructional game given by Philidor in <Analyse du jeu des Échecs>, 1750, pp26-33. Philidor does not identify either player.
Dec-04-15  Solomon2003: who knows the full form of nn
Dec-04-15  john barleycorn: <Solomon2003: who knows the full form of nn>

before I thought it stands for <nomen nescio> for <I don't know the name> but I learned from a kibitzer here that it actually stands for <Not Nakamura>.

Apr-11-16  juanhernandez: very instructional !!!
Oct-06-16  posoo: now DIS is a pag with unotations dat are EXOSTING to read. da old posoo's hed is SPINING.

Dis game is useles and i wod ike to hear som of filador's cumpositions.

Oct-23-17  schnarre: ...Instructional annotations by a classical master of the game!
Nov-27-17  krippp: The principle of development expressed after move <10.O-O> !!?

"Again, it being necessary to observe, as a general rule, that, as it is often dangerous to attack the adversary too soon, here likewise you must be reminded not to be too hasty in your attack, until your pawns are previously sustained by one another, AND ALSO BY YOUR PIECES, otherwise those premature attacks will be unsuccessful, as will be shown by a back-game on this play." -Philidor

Admittedly he isn't clear whether the attacking pawns/piecces should be supported by only some pieces, or by ALL of his pieces, but then again, it varies in practice also... I'm not familiar with Philidor's games but here he seems to complete his development well, with the exception of <16..h5>, which seems slightly paranoid; Morphy would've completed opening development with <16..O-O-O> and if <17.Rg3> then <17..Qe6>.

Great annotations and game anyway, I'm impressed.

Jan-06-20  Marcelo Bruno: Philidor played his own Defense.
Jan-06-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: The term "back game" appears a few times in the annotations. What does it mean?
Jan-07-20  ndg2: Dionysius1: I guess it means 'analysis' or 'post mortem'.
Jan-07-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: Makes sense, thanks
Feb-29-20  belmanoir: Dionysius1: I'm reading through Philidor's Analysis on archive.org, and he uses "back game" to mean that once he's taken you through the game, he shows you what you should have done if your opponent moved differently at a given point--i.e. the game branches at key moves, and he calls the secondary games "back games."
Mar-14-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: Heh Belmanoir! Thanks for the research, and welcome to the site. Best wishes, Dion
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: OTHER. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Philidor Def Lopez Countergambit (C41) 0-1 The Big Clamp 4Blk
from N O P Players by fredthebear
Opening Theory
from 67JediChessMaster's Games for Learning by 67JediChessMaster
0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 1
by 0ZeR0
La gran descripción
from Otros Favoritos by juan31
Philidor Def Lopez Countergambit (C41) 0-1 The Big Clamp 4Blk
from Annotations e4 Various Authorities & Fredthebear by fredthebear
early games
by wwall
Defensa Philidor comentada por Philidor
from My favorite games by titoramia
Philidor Def Lopez Countergambit (C41) 0-1 The Big Clamp 4Blk
from Annotations e4 Various Authorities & Fredthebear by Patca63
Analyse du jeu des Échecs 1749 (GOTD)
from Favorite Games from (1515-1916) by igiene
"Pawns are the Soul of Chess." -Philidor
from The French Revolution by RhapsodyChess
masters games
by Solomon2003
Converging rooks. 28APR2022
from Games for My Chess Kids by nasmichael
Philidor Annotates
by selfmate
The Big Clamp for Black
by kenilworthian
Philidor Def Lopez Countergambit (C41) 0-1 The Big Clamp 4Blk
from yFredthebear's Heavy Pieces Hound the Ranks by trh6upsz
Ahead of his Time
from JonathanJ's favorite games 3 by JonathanJ
March 28: Pawns Towards the Centre
from Game of the Day 2010 by Phony Benoni

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC