Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Israel Albert Horowitz vs Reuben Fine
Syracuse (1934), Syracuse, NY USA, rd 2, Aug-14
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Modern Steinitz Defense Siesta Variation (C74)  ·  1-0



Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 16 more I A Horowitz/Fine games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Not Reuben's Finest moment.
Mar-16-11  Ulhumbrus: After 8...d5 Black has a pawn chain consisting of the pawns on d5 and e4. How does White attack and remove it? Horowitz's answer is to attack the pawn chain by 9 f3.
Jul-08-13  jerseybob: What's with Fine's 14th move? Did he think white's queen was still on f3? I can empathize: I've had many such illusions myself.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: I've found a couple of contemporary reports on the game:

<"...Horowitz won from Reuben Fine in 27 moves. The latter went astray in a book variation of the Ruy Lopez, which proved to be inferior. Horowitz won his queen, and thereafter played carefully until victory rewarded his efforts."> -- New York Times, August 15, 1934.

Well, it's not like Horowitz won the queen, but let that pass.

<"Time pressure again affected several of the players last night. The sensation of the second round was the defeate of Reuben Fine by I. A. Horowitz, who recently lost a set match to the youthful Western champion. Fine, on the black side of a Ruy Lopez, drifted into a losing variation which, strangely enough, had been recommended by several book authorities.

"Fine, depending upon published analysis, found himself in hot water when Horowitz steered off from the beaten path. After losing his queen for two minor pieces, Fine made the best of a bad bargain, but resigned just as his clock was about to register his first two hours. It was Horowitz's second success in two days."> -- New York Sun, August 15, 1934

And it's not like Fine lost the queen, either. But proceeding to the opening.

Horowitz's <8.Ng5> was a newer line in this variation, and Fine's <8...d5> (now the main line) made its debut. The critical point appears to arise after <9.f3>:

Opening Explorer

Judging by the results in the Opening Explorer, we can now assess Fine's <9...e3> as clearly inferior to 9...h6. The latter move was first played iin M Shishov vs Nezhmetdinov, 1947 and disappeared until the 1970s, but once it came back the 9...e3 variation went out of favor.

Perhaps Horowitz's <10.f4> was the "nonbook" move that Fine overlooked. He probably spent time analyzing the straight pawn sacrifice after 10.Bxe3, and didn't anticipate such a paradoxical move.

What can we conclude? Fine was probably knocked off balance when his preparation went askew, so an hallucination (as <jerseybob> suggests) is possible. Or he may have just panicked, though his situation doesn't seem to be that bad as yet.

Or maybe Fine just didn't understand these positions where a pinned knight captures another knight. Who could forget Fine vs M Yudovich Sr., 1937?

Jul-09-13  RookFile: I don't know. Played over this mess, it actually looks like close to a magnificent conception by Fine. The only problem is it doesn't work. The devil is in the details - give Fine an extra tempo and he's probably winning.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Round 2 (Tuesday, August 14)
from Syracuse 1934 by Phony Benoni
Round 2 (Tuesday, August 14)
from Syracuse 1934 by docjan
Chess Review: Years Covered
by igiene
Chess Review: Years Covered
by Phony Benoni

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC