chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Wordsworth Donisthorpe vs Mundell
"Goodbye, Blue Mundell" (game of the day Apr-17-2006)
Casual Game (1892), London
Three Knights Opening: General (C46)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 6 more games of W Donisthorpe
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-17-06  Ezzy: Sorry everybody but I am going to have a bit of a moan. :-)

The games in the last 2 days were a credit to be worthy of the title 'game of the day.' Then we get this!

A casual game between 2 unknown players, one of the players has 1 game in the database and the other player has 2 games in the database AND the other game was played against NN. How can there be any credibility in this game?

Ok, the finishing position was pretty cool, but there must be thousands of interesting games that could entertain us.

Who are these players?

You might as well just throw one of my own amateur games in for 'game of the day!'

Yours Faithfully

Disappointed :-)

Apr-17-06  EmperorAtahualpa: Come on, <Ezzy>, be a little more optimistic. Of course, this game isn't as professional as some others, but it's still instructive for kibitzers who are more at the novice level as it has quite a neat combination in the end!

Actually, for novice players it might make even more sense to watch through these more simple games before they move on to more complex ones, which they would hardly understand..

Apr-17-06  thundershock2k: wow, i would have never thunk of that!
hats off to that fellow
Apr-17-06  itz2000: can anyone take a look at my comment and reply? <THANKS!>
Apr-17-06  Microbe: Would anyone attack me if I were to call this game "cute"?

The reason for 4. Bg4 itz2000, is similar to the reason it is used in the Ruy Lopez...and h3 is similar to Morphy's defense (The reason I don't use the Ruy Lopez). Am I right? Or am I just being amateurish guys?

Apr-17-06  peabody88: <itz2000> I think that the main idea of ♗g4 is to try to wrestle the initiative away from white. now white has to take care of his ♘ before going on with his development. I think that in this game black lost the oportunity of using that pin when he refused to exchange. After the refusal his ♗ didn't do anything at all and only deprived his ♔ from a flight sqare.
Apr-17-06  Ezzy: <itz2000:> Your assessment of 4..Bg4 is pretty good. You have outlined the advantages and disadvantages of the move. There are other reasonable moves in the position, namely 4..Nf6 4..exd4 4..Bd7 4..Nge7 so basically none of these moves are bad, it is just a matter of preference of what type of positions you prefer to play, and what plans arise from these positions. But with your thinking process about 4..Bg4 I would say you are good chessplayer. You are asking very logical questions about the nature of the moves. But it is a matter of style in that position. Just like some players never choose a Sicilian defence, while other players only play a Sicilian defence. It's your own personal choice. There are pro's and cons to a lot of moves in chess. This is what makes chess the worlds greatest game. Decision making, it can win lose or draw you a game.
Apr-17-06  Ezzy: Also it's like the age old question about the problematic developement of Blacks 'white squared bishop' in the French defence. That is a disadvantage, but the advantage is that you have a defence which is difficulr to penetrate due to the solid pawn structure.

Again, it is just a matter of your personal preference for different kinds of positions.

Apr-17-06  Ezzy: <EmperorAtahualpa: Come on, <Ezzy>, be a little more optimistic.> You're right! Must be the Easter holidays coming to an end and I am becoming grumpy. Ah well, an occasional moan brushes off the cobwebs of easter inactivity.

Actually I think I am still upset by the fact that I would never of noticed the queen sac coming. It's one of those moves where once it is played against you, you stare at the board for the next hour in total shock that it could ever of been possible. I must admit, 15 Qxe5+ was stunning!!

Apr-17-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Black has the grim task of choosing which door he will open to allow the bishop to mate.
Apr-17-06  Chess Classics: <Sneaky: Aren't there any Kurt Vonnegut fans here?> Kurt lived in the same hometown as me, and worked a lot at the University of Iowa Writer's Workshop. Apparently he was a jerk, but that's okay because he was a great writer.

Regards,
CC

Apr-17-06  itz2000: Thanks guys//

<ezzy> Well, I got some compliments from people which when heard I'm playing for 6 months (18 years old boy) said I'm going to be master soon, but well, just 2 months ago I resigned to Eric Shiller on 9 move (on an openning I didn't know, no excuses will be accepted though ;) ).. so I guess we all have our un/lucky days.

I've read this tempo thing on "MY SYSTEM" by Aron Nimzowitsch, and I never really understand that attack which now seems to be as to get opposite to play how u like him to, also,
if there's a Knight Pressuering d4 square exchange is good to bishop since Bxf3==> Qxf3 (if gxd3 you're in trouble, you got a bit stronger center while castle would be a suicide [Qh4, Qg5 and black finds its gold way to mate/earn the g pawn atleast.] anyhow, Bxf3, Qxf3, Nxd4, and white's in trouble. But not a good player would ever play with remainning the pressuer on the d4 square without giving it a backup [Bc3, c3, (I preffer Bc3 followed by Nd2 in this case) )

It's like someone who will play
1. e4 e5
2. Bc4 a6(just to make an example)
3. Qf3 a5(..)
4. Qxf7#

No one will play like that... so why white should even try to do Qf3, he will be blocked immdiatly by f6 or Nf6, so it's a loss of tempo just like this 4..Bd4 thing.

I think I will not play net chess untill I will finish the 2 books I got from my brother to my birthday (My System and The Road To Chess Improvement), I still got alot alot alot to learn.

Summary, In my opinion 4..Bg4 is a mistake if black wasn't willing to exchange if (4+n).h3 (n>1).

Apr-17-06  Jim Bartle: CC: Why do say Vonnegut's considered a jerk?

My favorite was the TV movie "Between Time and Timbuktu," which I gather is sort of a grab-all of Vonnegut's best ideas.

Apr-17-06  Chess Classics: <Jim Bartle> I'm just gossiping (a friend told me once that a friend told him that Kurt Vonnegut was a jerk.) However, my brother does have a t-shirt for his debate club that says "City High Debate-We Don't Like People" and shows a picture of Kurt Vonnegut on the front. That seems like pretty incriminating evidence to me.

Regards,
CC

Apr-17-06  Jim Bartle: I can think of a lot of candidates for the picture on that T-shirt.
Apr-17-06  chess champion 8: This was a very nice finish for white. One of the best series of moves for checkmate that I have seen. The knight sack to bring the queen for check was good! I think he saw this checkmate when he played Bd3. Awesome finish!
Apr-17-06  itz2000: well what I wrote explains this I guess
Opening Explorer

But I still do see highly rated players go back with the Bishops instead of exchanging :(

Apr-17-06  Ezzy: <itz2000> In these situations where a pawn attacks the bishop and a player retreats the bishop, it is not really seen as a loss of tempo, because it is only a pawn move which doesn't have any significance in the developement of the pieces. If on the other hand a player develops a piece which forces a retreat, then that can be seen as a loss of tempo for the person retreating, unless he has forced a weakness in the opponents position.
Apr-17-06  weisyschwarz: Just another manic Mundell.
Apr-17-06  schnarre: OW, now this one hurt!
Apr-17-06  Knight13: Ho ho!! Nice tactic!! :)
Apr-18-06  Ezzy: <weisyschwarz: Just another manic Mundell> Whoh oh whoh!
May-05-06  weisyschwarz: Okay...how about Rainy Days and Mundells always Get me Down? :-)
Oct-22-06  niranjanchess23: gud gud game
Oct-02-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  sea7kenp: Hey! Poisoned Queen!
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
nnn
from Game of the Days by hidude
15. Qxe5+!
from Mate (Mate in 2) by patzer2
Game no. 223 [ends with 14...Ke7 and announced mate in two]
from The 1000 Best Short Games of Chess by Susan1975
Three Knights Opening (C46) 1-0 Qh5+ leads to mate by Bishops
from 3 Knights Knights Knights of Fredthebear Advice by fredthebear
Brutal Attacking Chess
by rbaglini
Queen sac by taking central pawn forces unusual Bishop mate!
from Charming Miniatures by syracrophy
motel swim pool splashed Fredthebear C20s-C40s
by fredthebear
15 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection VI by wwall
"Goodbye, Blue Mundell
from nasaruppin's favorite games by nasaruppin
mihai's favorite games
by mihai
JKCDXX's Favorite Games
by JKCDXX
pf1450's favorite games
by pf1450
birdinflight's favorite games
by birdinflight
Wordsworth Donisthorpe
from Names of the Game by GumboGambit
Romantic Chess
by greatdane
Most Awesome Queen Sac Ever!
from JonathanJ's favorite games 3 by JonathanJ

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC