chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Alfred Kreymborg vs Jose Raul Capablanca
New York Masters (1911), New York, NY USA, rd 9, Jan-30
Queen Pawn Game: General (D00)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 1 more A Kreymborg/Capablanca game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you register a free account you will be able to create game collections and add games and notes to them. For more information on game collections, see our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-22-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Judging from the number of comments this is not one of Capablanca's famous masterpieces, but there are some interesting points even in these unknown games.

Take 3...c4. We've all been taught not to play this move against a Colle or Stonewall setup. "Don't relax the tension!" and all that. But Capa does it here, and it's absolutely the right decision.

Why? Ask yourself, "What is the purpose of the Bd3 in these situation?" Partly, it's the kingside attack, but more importantly it's the support for the e3-e4 push at a point where White can profit from opening up the center.

Usually, the opportunity for ...c4 by Black comes after White has played c3, allowing the bishop to retreat to c2. From there, it still participates in kingside action and still supports e3-e4--which has been given added oomph because it's precisely what White wants to play to undermine the c4 pawn.

But in this game, White has not played c3. The bishop has to retreat passively, and White is never able to get the activating e4 push in until it's far too late.

Then there's the little tactical interlude beginning with 17...e4 18.c4. I get the impression White is just trying to mess with Capablanca's head, planning to answer 18...exf3 with 19.Qxf5. So Black just counters by protecting or moving the knight, White moves his knight, and we get on with life? Right?

Not quite! Now, Capablanca sees no advantage in releasing the tension, so he just keeps improving his position elsewhere. White goes along with the gag until 21...Qb5! smacks him upside the head.

Now the threat is 22...exf3 23.Qxf5 Qe2, threatening mate and the unprotected bishop on d2--which works because, at this moment, White doesn't have the move Rf1-f2 available. After 22.Ne1 Qe2 White is in a world of hurt; if, say, 23.Qc3 to protect the e-pawn, then 23...Bxf4 24.exf4 e3 25.Bxe3 (25.Bc1 Qf2+ 26.Kh1 Qf1#) 25...Nxe3 with threats of mate on both f1 and g2.

So White gives up the knight and mounts a desperate assault which at least allows him the moral victory of a mate threat. This goes nowhere fast, and Black soon has the chance to trade queens. Naturally, the great master of simplification and endgame play ... spurns the trade and scores with a mating attack of his own.

You don't mess around with Capa.

Jun-22-07  Ziggurat: <Phony> Very perceptive comments.
May-24-09  blacksburg: good stuff, <PB>. i overlooked the significance of 21...Qb5! until i read your comments.
Dec-04-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  technical draw: This Kreymborg is a pretty strong amateur. Even his opening "mistakes" appear to be just tactical moves. I play a lot of games like this on the internet, players making strange opening moves or making tricky moves that will work against lesser players. But this is Mr. Capablanca. It works against your friends but not against the world champion.
Aug-04-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mateo: 22.Kf2?? was simply an awful blunder.
Apr-28-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: 3...c4 is nearly justifiable if given an a6 followup but it seems White could have had a slight advantage with the undermining move b3 because of Nc6 being the follow up:

Alfred Kreymborg - Jose Raul Capablanca 0-1 9.0, New York Masters 1911


click for larger view

Analysis by Stockfish 15 - 3 threads max:

1. ⩲ (0.43): 5...cxb3 6.axb3 e6 7.Nf3 Nf6 8.0-0 b6 9.c4 Bb7 10.Nc3 Bb4 11.Qc2 0-0 12.Ba3 Bxa3 13.Rxa3 Qe7 14.Raa1

As an analogous example of what can go wrong in these positions, there is my "Dark square strangulation" video showing how Karpov health with Polgar when c4 was played:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayS...

Also f6 by Capablanca was "shakey" - White misses e4:

Alfred Kreymborg - Jose Raul Capablanca 0-1 9.0, New York Masters 1911


click for larger view

Analysis by Stockfish 15 - 3 threads max:

1. ⩲ (0.59): 11...dxe4 12.Nxc6 bxc6 13.Bxc4 Nd5 14.Qe1 e3 15.Nb3 a5 16.Bxe3 a4 17.Nc5 Qe7 18.Rf2 0-0 19.a3 Ra5 20.Na6 Qb7 21.Nb4 Re8 22.Bd3 Qc7 23.Qd2 Raa8 24.h3 Nxe3 25.Qxe3 c5 26.Na6

So basically two "rule violations" if I were to be objective about the truth in this game and what it might be instructive for :

1) Tension release with c4
2) f6 active operation when king in the center still

This stuff would be punished by modern Grandmasters in my view

Cheers, K

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
April, p. 87 [Game 96 / 2132]
from American Chess Bulletin 1911 by Phony Benoni
Stonewall Attempt vs Bf5 (D00) 0-1 Stockfish notes
from Bf5 Defenses Keep Out Fredthebear by fredthebear
Capablanca!
by Sven W
51# New York Tournament. Round 8 (1/30/1911)
from Capablanca┬┤s Official Games (1901-1939) Part I by capablancakarpov
Stonewall Attempt vs Bf5 (D00) 0-1 Stockfish notes
from White Walls, Black Stones, and Read Newspapers by fredthebear
Capablanca!
by chocobonbon
Capa's Kills
by Bobby A
Round 9 -- 30 Jan 1911
from 1911 New York Masters by crawfb5
51# New York Tournament. Round 8 (1/30/1911)
from Capablanca Matches (1901-1913) by Patszer
Capablanca!
by wvb933
New York Masters (1/30/1911) Rd 9
from under construction - A Capa collection by Calli

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC