|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Jun-26-09 | | chesssantosh: yes best move in chess i have ever seen.it looks like a quite move but in fact is a brilliant move.it falls under every category like sacrifice or deflection or interference.an awesome move. |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | Dr. Funkenstein: I agree with Hedgehog as Marshall's Qg3 is my favorite move of all time as well, but Bc7 is an absolutely stunning
move both in its visual and tactical value |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | kellmano: <Capablanca44> First time i've seen that avatar and it's probably my favourite. |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | gtgloner: Here is a link to see the position referred to by Marshall's Qg3, (at the bottom of the page): http://www.chessbase.com/columns/co...
This move has been called "the most brilliant move in the history of chess". I remember reading a chess book where someone was quoted as saying "Some of Marshall's greatest moves first appear as typographical errors" |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | njchess: A very famous game by Tarrasch. The Plachutta is rarely seen in chess since most key squares are over-protected. Bc7 is a tremendously delightful move. Reinfeld couldn't have said it better. I wonder how long it took Black to understand what had just happened! |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | percyblakeney: Monokroussos showed something a bit similar in his blog from a game played a couple of weeks ago. Black resigned before the combination was played out, otherwise the finish would have looked like this:
click for larger viewNe7+ and if the bishop takes it's Qh7#, if the rook takes it is Rxf8# and if the queen takes it is Rxf8+ Qxf8 Qh7# http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/fil... |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | Funicular: I've alwayls liked Qg3 better. This is a beautiful "quiet" move, but Qg3 is more visually stunning, since it's in front of the kingside castling. It's like "Nowhere to run" This is just as Petrosian - Pachman Bg7 i think it was |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | kevin86: The move in itself is not the greatest in my opinion,but the follow-up is! 31 ♗c7!! ♕xc7 32 ♕b7+!! ♕xb7 33 ♖xc5#
WOW!!! |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | brainzugzwang: OK, here's the patzer question of the day: What's the followup to 30...Kxa5 that I'm not seeing? I see a whole bunch of danger for the black K, but I'm not seeing what nails it down. |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | dhotts: <kevin86 31 Bc7!! Qxc7 32 Qb7+!! Qxb7 33 Rxc5#> I don't think this is mate as 33...Rxc5 and now what does White do? There must be something wrong with the move sequence as Black has a rook at c8 that can recapture on c5. |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | dhotts: <kevin86> Actually there is nothing wrong with the move sequence, the mate occurs as follows. 31.Bc7 Qxc7 32.Rxc5+ Qxc5 33.Qb7+ Kxa5 34.Ra1#. |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | jsheedy: <brainzugzwang> If 30. Kxa5, 31. Ra2+ (or Ra1+), Qa4, 32. Rxa4#.
click for larger view |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | Once: !!!!!
(That's the sound of me being speechless with admiration. What a move!) |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | WhiteRook48: this pun is weird |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | Once: <WhiteRook48>
"Ashes to ashes" ...
Part of the Christian burial service (ashes to ashes, dust to dust). A song by David Bowie.
A british martial arts film.
A british TV series about a time travelling policeman (series one) and policewoman (series two and three). A star trek voyager episode.
A Faith no more song.
Quite a clever pun, at least that's what I thought. |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | lzromeu: <"White's last move is one of the most beautiful ever played on the chess-board." Reinfeld> And most complex too. About 30 minutes looking it and I not yet understand all the possibilities. |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | Once: Okay, let's see if we can map all the main variations here. From the starting position ...
click for larger view... white threatens both 32. Rxc5# and 32. Qb6+ Kxa5 33. Ra2# or Ra1#. Any "pass" move by black gives white a choice of these mates, so black needs to block the attack, give a perpetual check or a move that defends both b7 and c5. Let's try the rook recapture first:
31... Rxc7 32. Qb7+ Kxa5 (32...Rxb7 33. Rxc5#) 33. Ra1+ Qa4 34. Rxa4# Then we'll try the queen recapture:
31... Qxc7 32. Rxc5+ Qxc5 33. Qb7+ Kxa5 (33... Qb6 34. Qxb6#) 34.
Ra1#
Then let's try to interpose the black queen:
31... Qc6 32. Rxc5+ Qxc5 33. Qb7+ Qb6
34. Qxb6#
Then we can try a pawn block:
31...c4 32. Qb7+ Kxc5 33. Rxc4#
Throwing a rook doesn't help either:
31...Rxg2+ 32. Qxg2 Now the finish will be as for the previous variations. For example, 32...Qxc7 33. Rxc5+ Qxc5 34. Qb7+ Qb6 35. Qxb6# Can't claim too much credit for spotting all this - Fritzie did the hard work. A fabulous achievement for Tarrasch to work out the complications OTB. |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | lzromeu: <once> Tks a lot. Really beautiful puzzle-move. |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | whiteshark: Another OTB Plachutta <sleepyirv: Apparently not> How about <36.Rc6!!> in Navara vs A Dergatschova Daus, 2007 
click for larger view |
|
Jun-26-09
 | | sleepyirv: <Once> Thanks! I really like this game and thought it was really worthy GOTD. Spent a good 10 minutes trying to find a pun out of Plachutta until I came up with this entry. |
|
Jun-26-09
 | | Benzol: We know Major Tom's a junkie. |
|
| Jun-26-09 | | ROADDOG: <once> Thanks for showing the lines after 31.Bc7. Amazing. Could or did Fritz find Bc7 after 30...Kb5? |
|
| Jun-27-09 | | Lightboxes: IF 30. ... Kxa5
Then
31. Rxc5+, Rxc5
32. Rxc5+, Kb6
33. Rc7, Qe6
34. Qb7+, Ka5
35. Rc5# |
|
| Jun-27-09 | | Once: <ROADDOG: Could or did Fritz find Bc7 after 30...Kb5?> Afraid so! Bc7 is one of those counter-intuitive moves that we mortals find so difficult, but the computer spots in an instant. I've got Fritz11 running on a so-so laptop and it found Bc7 in about 2 seconds. I suppose the computer's weakness and strength is that it has no intuition or feeling about a position. This means that it will examine a lot of garbage moves that we would dismiss in a heartbeat. But occasionally one of those garbage moves will turn out to be pure gold. That is why the computer is a lot better than us at finding counter-intuitive moves, such as putting a piece en prise. |
|
| Jun-27-09 | | gilbav: <whiteshark> I think the combination in Navara - Dergatschova Daus is not a Plachutta. It seems a little simpler. The rook and bishop are not similarly-moving pieces -- if one of them takes on c6 it blocks the other, and that's it. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plachu... |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing
Annotations by 