chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Eric Schiller vs Howery Pack
"April Fool's Mate" (game of the day Apr-01-2008)
Port Washington (skittles) (1969), Port Washington, WI USA
King Pawn Game: Parham Attack (C20)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 729 more games of E Schiller
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-31-12  rogl: I have actually played this game: 1.g4 e5 2.f3 ♕h4#. To make things clear: I was black.
Feb-17-12  Nemesistic: A 3 move chess game in this sites DB !!!

I'll learn more from Gizmo's efforts, i think i may upload one of mine for him to chew on, the bearded rascal lol

Seriously though chessgames.com, what purpose does this game serve being here, forgetting the name of one of the players involved!

Apr-02-12  rrrttt: Hey look your king has a magnet on it!
Aug-28-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Cf. L Palau vs S Kalabar, 1927.
Oct-09-12  Abdel Irada: <rogl: I have actually played this game: 1.g4 e5 2.f3 h4#. To make things clear: I was black.>

I think all of us have been on the black side of that game at least once.

But, although statistically some of us must also have been on the white side, I doubt we'll see anyone admit it.

Oct-09-12  JohnBoy: <Once: ...he accidentally touches his Bc1 instead...if you touched a piece that cannot move you must instead play a move with your king.> I once was reaching for a piece when my sleeve hit another piece and knocked it over. Both my opponent and I were 1500 newbs and I consented, moving the "touched" piece and promptly lost major material.

Next time (if there is such) I will pull a Kasparov. The point of the rule is, of course, touch with intent.

Oct-09-12  Abdel Irada: Apropos of touch-move, this reminds me of an incident when I was in high school. We were playing qualifier matches to select members for our team for an upcoming interscholastic tournament, and I was two moves from mating one of my opponents when he complained that, ten moves before, I'd touched my rook before my king when castling.

There was no faculty advisor on hand, so the matter was left to the club officers to decide. Unfortunately, none of them really understood the rules applying to this sort of situation, so they ultimately forced me to back up ten moves and move my rook instead of castling. This changed the position just enough that my opponent escaped with a perpetual check.

As it turned out, it didn't matter. My results were still good enough that I made the team. As for how I played on that team ... let's just say that it's not a good idea to play too many blitz games between rounds.

Dec-31-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: As I understand it, in Lindemann-Echtermayer White didn't just bump the bishop by accident. He actually played 3.Bc3.

<Adbel Irada> Surely there is a "statute of limitations" for touch-move claims. You shouldn't get to see how the game develops and, if it develops badly for you, claim "touch-move" a zillion years after the fact.

May-27-13  Abdel Irada: <<Adbel Irada> Surely there is a "statute of limitations" for touch-move claims. You shouldn't get to see how the game develops and, if it develops badly for you, claim "touch-move" a zillion years after the fact.>

To be sure there is: I think one has to claim a touch-move violation before making a move in reply. But I didn't know that at the time, or at any rate couldn't prove it.

(Also, I believe that touching rook before king in castling is permitted. In an excess of caution, however, I have always been sure since that incident to touch the king first.)

May-27-13  Abdel Irada: Black's idea was logical, if a tempo too slow.

The king *almost* defends the e-pawn. ;-)

Aug-06-13  GumboGambit: According to Rybka, things started going downhill for Black with Ke7.
Aug-06-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <But, although statistically some of us must also have been on the white side, I doubt we'll see anyone admit it.>

Didn't some of the world champs (Tal? Petrosian?) admit to have lost his very first game by Fool's Mate? Which is quite a distinguishment, as most beginners record their first mating loss to the other short mate, the Scholar's one.

Aug-06-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <alexmagnus>: Believe Tal mentioned in an interview that he came to an end in his very first game by Scholar's Mate.
Oct-11-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: I got mated in six moves in my first game for my school team - a version of Scholar's Mate, as I recall. I only scraped back onto the team for the next match because somebody was ill -- but I won it, and won all my other games, and was top board by the end of the season. Maybe I should've quit while I was (just one) behind.
Oct-20-13  kramputz: Waste of space
Mar-07-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Bronstein remarks, "The most pleasant variation of the Queen's Attack for White is as follows: 2.Q-R5 K-K2 3.QxKP mate." <200 Open Games>, p. 1.
Mar-07-17  paavoh: <I have actually played this game: 1.g4 e5 2.f3 ♕h4#. To make things clear: I was black.>

I was also on the winning side in a high school casual game. My opponent was always eager to attack and he opened with 1.f4. I replied meekly with 1.- e6. He exclaimed "More attack!" and played 2.g4. I played 2.-Qh4 and said "I agree!"

Apr-30-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: A beautiful and profound game.
Apr-30-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Count Wedgemore: <Richard Taylor: A beautiful and profound game.>

Yes, the courage shown by the black king is an inspiration to us all. Bravely, he steps up in front of all his subjects and in sheer defiance dares the white queen: "-you can take me, but spare my men!" Beautiful and profound.

Nov-07-18  Saniyat24: Let's play another round...I was just joking...sorry to say I have not embarrassed myself like this. I hate it when people play Sicilian Bowlder attack against me as White..not a fan of moving the queen in your first or second move, come on people I know how to play chess, you can't mate me with your Queen and Bishop...think that is Scholar's mate. Why am I writing this here? surely I will not turn into another Chris Owen...ah well...Aristotle said, There is no genius without a mixture of madness...<Richard Taylor> is to blame for my post...his comment is a <Phony Benoni>
Sep-03-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Korora: Howery Pack or Norman Nathaniel Pack?
Jul-18-20  Tonymec: <Abdel Irada> <Also, I believe that touching rook before king in castling is permitted.>

According to the curent FIDE rules (which I read yesterday) castling consists of: 1) moving the king two spaces towards the rook; 2) with the same hand, moving the rook to the square just crossed by the king. Rules used to be more lax: once upon a time, you could take the king in one hand and the rook in the other and put them on their new squares. Now (at least in FIDE competitions) you have to make your move and start your opponent's clock all with a single hand.

Moving the rook next to the king is a valid _rook_ move, and at that point it is too late to castle, which has always been a _king_ move. (Ke1-g1, OTOH, is not yet a valid move of any kind, you have to move the rook from h1 to f1 to complete it.)

Exception: in a game with a rook advantage, it is allowed to castle on the side of the absent rook by moving the king two squares in that direction, provided that the other conditions for castling are fulfilled.

Jul-18-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I like that someone ran this through Stockfish.
Jul-19-20  Granny O Doul: If I sensed my opponent had played 2. Qh5 from a genuine hope of landing Scholar's mate, I'd probably play 2...Nc6, but otherwise I'd go with 2 ...Nf6, because it is psychologically important to meet contempt with contempt.
Nov-08-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I once was Black in an online blitz game that began 1.g4 e5 2.f4. I almost played 2...exf4, but thought better of it. A true King's Gambit.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Leader of the Pack
from Super-brevities by FSR
w3
from Checkmate miniatures by Kasputin
2. Ke7????
from Quick checkmates by lanaom
P-K4 Parham Attack (C20) 1-0 April Fool's, 3 move blunder
from C20 Q's Hack & C40 Damiano's Defense Odd P-K4 by fredthebear
2...Ke7!! is nearly the best move ever played.
from Games that don't fit in my other collections. by Rubenus
3 drags matt!
from xfer's favorite games 2008 by xfer
Parham Attack
from marwanredman123's favorite games 4 by marwanredman123
The only game I ever memorized....(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 3 by kishchess
Bad on both levels.
from RTC, CNAN by fredthebear
Very short, decisive games in C20.
by Chessman100
Dubious
by PinkLedDoor
fool me once-shame on u;fool me twice-er,u can't fool me again.
from pun city by kevin86
Mate rapidíssimo 2
from Partidas de Xadrez by adalav
Game collection: a
by P KKt sq
The only game I ever memorized....(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 3 by xajik
The only game I ever memorized....(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 3 by Trigonometrist
2. Ke7????
from Quick checkmates by D.Observer
w3
from Checkmate miniatures by RookHook

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC