chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Chessgames.com will be unavailable September 29, 2023 from 11:00AM through 11:15AM(UTC/GMT) for maintenance.
We apologize for this inconvenience.
Carel Sammelius vs Arnold van den Hoek
NED (1942)
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation. Accelerated (E24)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Theo van Scheltinga.

explore this opening
find similar games 16 more games of A van den Hoek
sac: 19...Rxc1 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-18-08  sitzkrieg: who wrote the commentary to the game?
May-18-08  who: I was wondering the same thing. Maybe Bronstein?
Jun-22-09  returnoftheking: Must have been a very old Bronstein then; mentioning Polgar and Sadler. Great game by the way; from move 10 onwards it could be made one of those daily puzzles.
Dec-01-10  sneaky pete: The notes were written by Theo Daniel Van Scheltinga for the Van den Hoek chapter in "Partij verloren ..." (1947). That is to say, the actual content of analysis and evaluation corresponds 100% with Van Scheltinga's notes. The translator however embellished the text in most places (for instance at move 19 "Kort en krachtig" becomes "Although black is clearly winning this is a very crisp finish to an entertaining game") and adds some superfluous info on the opening variation, thus creating the impression of writing completely original notes. I can guess who is responsible here.
Feb-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: <sneaky pete> < thus creating the impression of writing completely original notes. I can guess who is responsible here>.

Come on, we wanna know who the culprit is :)

Feb-06-17  whiteshark: <sneaky pete> < thus creating the impression of writing completely original notes. I can guess who is responsible here>.

<Stonehenge:> <Come on, we wanna know who the culprit is :)>

I'll second what <Stonehenge> wrote. Inquiring minds are eager to learn ...

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Annotated Nimzo's
by Petrocephalon
C Samelius vs Arnoldus Johannes van den Hoek
from nimzo-indian saemisch with annotation by hungpawn
annotated miniature
from A.J. van den Hoek by returnoftheking
98_E24-E29_Nimzo-Indian w/ 4.f3 & Saemisch
by whiteshark
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch. Accelerated (E24) 0-1Discovery+
from Indians Past Nimzo-, Bogo-, Anti-Fredthebear by fredthebear
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch. Accelerated (E24) 0-1Discovery+
from yQThee Queen is MEAN to Fredthebear Volume 2!! by fredthebear
98_E24-E29_Nimzo-Indian w/ 4.f3 & Saemisch
by nakul1964
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch. Accelerated (E24) 0-1Discovery+
from Annotations by Various Authorities & Fredthebear by mneuwirth
Russ09's favorite games
by Russ09
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch. Accelerated (E24) 0-1Discovery+
from Annotations by Various Authorities & Fredthebear by blueChude
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch. Accelerated (E24) 0-1Discovery+
from Annotations by Various Authorities & Fredthebear by rpn4
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch. Accelerated (E24) 0-1Discovery+
from Annotations by Various Authorities & Fredthebear by blueChude

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC