Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Jozef Martin Boey vs Yakov Estrin
"Oh Boey!" (game of the day Sep-11-2005)
7th World Correspondence Championship (1972) (correspondence), ?
Spanish Game: Open. St. Petersburg Variation (C82)  ·  0-1



Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 2 more J M Boey/Estrin games
sac: 15...Ng3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-11-05  dac1990: Wow, a game from 1972 that wasn't Fischer-Spassky. You don't see that too often.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: A bizarre finish-both players have pawns on the seventh;but while black threatens to queen,white cannot carry out his similar threat due to black's checking chances:42 f8=♕ ♕xf8 43 ♖xf8 d1+ 44 ♘g1 and white is hopelessly entombed.

Black's threat is 42...d1=♕ 43 f8=♕ ♕xf8 44 ♖xd1 and black wins!


Sep-11-05  patzer2: Boey's positional sacrifice 15...Ng3!? creates an interesting and difficult struggle after Estrin accepts it. Following 16. hxg3 fxg3 17. Qd3, Boey's 17...Bf5! forces Estrin into an unfavorable exchange of the Queen for three pieces.

Such an exchange is often favorable to the side with more pieces, but in this case Boey is able to maintain a small but persistent advantage in this imbalanced position. Boey skillfully converts his small advantage of an extra pawn, queenside pawn majority majority and potential passed pawn to a decisive advantage.

Instead of accepting the sacrifice offer, I wonder if White might have done better declining it with 16. Rf2 = to .

After accepting the sacrifice, the alternative 22. Nxd4!? Qxd4+ 23. Kh1 Qxe5 24. Rb1 c5 25. Bd2 (-0.59 @ 20/52 depth & 1189kN/s) favors Boey, but might have given Estrin slightly better drawing chances. However, at this level of GM correspondence play, I wouldn't be surprised if Boey were able to push even this small plus for a win.

Sep-11-05  patzer2: Wow! Boey's 24...g5!! finds the winning move in the position, setting up a deep passed pawn combination. Notice how Boey utilizes a temporary pin and a plan to sacrifice the exchange and trap the Bishop on h3 as key elements of this forcing sequence.
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <patzer2: Boey's positional sacrifice 15...Ng3!? creates an interesting and difficult struggle>. I'm not sure that was really a sacrifice. After 22...Bxe5 black has a queen and three pawns for rook + bishop + knight. White had very few alternatives. In the game as played black can force white to give back the piece by playing 17...Qh4 18. Qxh7+ (18. Rd1 Qh2+ 19. Kf1 Qh1+ 20. Ke2 Qxg2+ 21. Ke3 Rxf3+ or 21. Ke1 Qf2#; or 18. Re1 Qh2+ 19. Kf1 Qh1+ 20. Ke2 Qxg2+ 21. Kd1 Qxf3+, with three passed pawns for the knight, one of them threatening to promote) 18...Qxh7 19. Bxh7+ Kxh7. If 16. Re1 black again has 16...Qh4. Then 17. Qd3 transposes into the line above, while after 17. Qd2 or Be3 there follows 17...Qh2+ Kf1 18. Qh1+ Ke2, etc., and black again picks up the f and g pawns.

White couldn't play 40. Re7+ because of 40...Kd6 41. f7 d1=Q (not 41...Kxe7 42. f8=Q+ K any 43. Qxc5, winning) 42. f8=Q Qxf1+ 43. Qxf1 Kxe7, with a two-pawn advantage. But if 40...Qxe7 then 41. fxe7 Kxe7 42. Rd1 wins.

Sep-11-05  patzer2: <al wazir> I think 15. Ng3!? was a true positional sacrifice because 16. Rd2 = (according to Fritz 8's assessment) and 22. Nxd4!? leave the possibility of this forcing a sure Black win in doubt.
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <patzer2: I think 15...Ng3!? was a true positional sacrifice because 16. Rd2 = (according to Fritz 8's assessment) and 22. Nxd4!? leave the possibility of this forcing a sure Black win in doubt.> 1. Do you mean 16. Rf2 or 16. Rd1? 2. The move 15. Ng3 may or may not have been winning, but if it initiates a forced sequence that leaves black materially even or better I don't see how it can be called a sacrifice.
Sep-11-05  franksp: This or a similar opening line, including the forced Queen for Rook and Bishop sacrifice, appeared in a game Smyslov-Reshevsky. Smyslov won that game.
Sep-11-05  patzer2: <al wazir> Thanks for the correction. I did intend 16. Rf2 = as the recommended followup to 15...Ng3!? Sorry for the confusion.

IM Jeremy Silman at defines a sacrfice as: < The voluntary offer of material for the purpose of gaining a more favorable advantage than the material investment. Unlike a combination, a sacrifice is not a cut and dried affair--there is usually an element of uncertainty associated with it. Though a combination always has one or more sacrifices, a sacrifice need not be associated with a combination.>

Sacrfices are classified into two broad categories:

1. Sham sacrifices or pseudo sacrifices which are part of a combination to gain a clear (e.g. winning) material/positional advantage or mate.

2. Genuine sacrifices which are intendended to gain an advantage or improve the position, but for which there is a degree of uncertainty as to whether the advantage will be gained.

In my assessment, 15...Ng3!? meets the qualification of a genuine sacrifice, since it is unclear whether it leads to an advantage with best play (i.e. "element of uncertainty" associated with it). Fritz 8 @ 14 depth indicates after 15...Ng3!? 16. Rf2 Qh4 17. Qd2 Nf5 18. Qc3 = the game is level. Just because Estrin missed this line does not make 15. Ng3!? a forced sequence (i.e. combination) leading to an advantage.

However, if it can be demonstrated that 15...Ng3 leads to a forced (e.g. winning) advantage with best play, then it would still qualify as a sham sacrfice (i.e. pseudo-sacrifice associated with a combination.)

For additional discussion of the term "sacrifice" see the kibitzing at Taimanov vs Petrosian, 1953.

Sep-11-05  atrifix: The game Smyslov vs Reshevsky, 1945 is very famous and similar, although Reshevsky obviously didn't know anything about Boleslavsky vs Ragozin, 1942 or Boleslavsky vs Botvinnik, 1943. Leaving the dark-squared Bishop on, as Estrin does here, is unfavorable for White, so I assume Estrin must have had some tactical idea in mind--but it never came to pass.
Jun-28-06  bernardchinshin: Estrin should have played 20. Bh3 taken the Bishop by 22. Nd4 Qd4 transposing into smyslov v reshevsky and boleslavsky v botvinnik
Jul-10-09  JonDSouzaEva: I think the players are the wrong way round, Estrin beat Boey in the 1972 ICCF Championships:

See also http://archive.correspondencechess....

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
rui open 0-1 KANON!
from xfer's favorite games 2006 by xfer
98_C80-C83_Ruy Lopez, Open
by webbing1947
from Passed Pawns by Jaredfchess
p. 38
from Spanish (Ruy Lopez): Open Kevin O'Connell by davidalbert58
7th Correspondence World Championship Final
by crawfb5
15. Ng3!? 16. hxg3 -/+ gives Black a lasting advantage
from Positional Sacrifices by patzer2
both sides poised to queen at buzzer
from polygamy or what's an extra Q among friends? by kevin86
15. Ng3!? 16. hxg3 -/+ gives Black a lasting advantage
from Positional Sacrifices by trh6upsz
both sides poised to queen at buzzer
from polygamy or what's an extra Q among friends? by rbaglini
p. 38
from Spanish (Ruy Lopez): Open Kevin O'Connell by webbing1947
98_C80-C83_Ruy Lopez, Open
by whiteshark
September 11: Oh Boey!
from Game of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
from Passed Pawns by kingscrusher
from Passed Pawns by trh6upsz
p. 38
from Spanish (Ruy Lopez): Open Kevin O'Connell by Patca63
from Passed Pawns by patzer2
From the book by Kevin O'Connell p. 38
from Spanish Open by Kafelnikov64

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC