chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Patrick Duffy vs Wilhelm Steinitz
"Duffy Ducks" (game of the day Aug-11-2021)
Casual game (1865), London ENG
Spanish Game: Schliemann Defense (C63)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 1 more P Duffy/Steinitz game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-28-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 22.Nb6+? was too optimisic but simple 22.b6 could win the game for white.
Aug-11-21  RookFile: Yeah, Duffy was absolutely crushing him but let him off the hook.
Aug-11-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: What's wrong with 26...Bxc6 ?
Aug-11-21  Amarande: <al wazir> 27 Qxc6+ looks pretty decent for White. 3P (all connected passed) vs. R, and Black will likely have to give up the e4 pawn too if he is to avoid a perpetual.

4P vs. R is actually a pretty fighting chance as long as the Rook's side lacks a passed Pawn, so it's not really a very clear winning line for Black. Retaining the B allows ultimately for a far more effective convergence on the White King, as we see later in the game.

Aug-11-21  Brenin: <al wazir>, <Amarande>: For what it's worth, the local SF gives -3.79 after 26 ... Bxc6 27 Qxc6+ Kb8 28 Qb6+ Qb7, but = (draw by repetition) after 27 bxc6 e3 28 Qa6+ Kc7 29 Qa7+.
Aug-11-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Teyss: The pun should actually be "Steinitz Ducks" (the attack and wins), but then it wouldn't be a pun 🤔
In the end Duffy didn't duck, he took it full blown.
Aug-11-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Teyss: Good game BTW.
In case anybody is wondering about the finish (as I did), it is 34.Kh1 Rg4+ 35.Rxb7 (forced) Kxb7 and the extra R will prove stronger than the 3 connected Ps.
Aug-11-21  Brenin: <Teyss>: Yes, the three connected passed Ps will be reduced to two after 36 Rc1 Rc5, and the remaining two will not survive much longer.
Aug-11-21  GlennOliver: This the sort of game I hate (unjustly).

A clearly won endgame, but then try to play it through to a win against silicon, without any hints, and fail repeatedly in embarrassingly foolish ways.

Kudos to anyone who found unassisted the
34. ...Rg4+
successful continuation.

Aug-11-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Teyss: <GlennOliver: Kudos to anyone who found unassisted the 34. ...Rg4+ successful continuation.> Honestly it wasn't too difficult, the thought process could be: why did White resign? 34.Kh1 is forced so let's look at checks first.

Along the row does not give much e.g. 34...Ra2+ 35.Kg1 Rxa6 and Black just has B+2P vs 3P of which 2 connected, passed and advanced.
So let's look at the column. 34...Rg3+ unnecessarily leaves the R en prise so Rg4+ and the WK cannot move, forcing 35.Rxb7. Now Black has R+2P vs 4P but as <Brenin> noted one will soon fall.

"Check checks first", not "Patzer sees check, patzer gives check."

And agreed, against silicon even a won endgame is difficult since these bastards never resign.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
22.b6! +- was correct continuation of white's counter-attack
from Missed chances by trh6upsz
22.b6! +- was correct continuation of white's counter-attack
from Missed chances by Honza Cervenka
Spanish Game: Schliemann Defense (C63) ยท 0-1
from The t_t Players: Staunton, Steinitz & Zukertort by fredthebear
Schliemann Defense
by cayo89
error enrroque
from schliemann by viniloangel
August 11: Duffy Ducks
from Game of the Day 2021 by Phony Benoni

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC