Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Adolf Anderssen vs Jules Arnous de Riviere
Paris (1860), Paris FRA
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense. Polerio Defense Suhle Defense (C59)  ·  1-0



explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Anderssen/de Riviere games
sac: 58.Rxe8 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-03-04  Eatman: Even in the endgame Anderssen's superb tactical vision shines through. 43. Rxh4+ must have been quite a shock to De Riviere.
Jul-05-04  blitzkrieg: absolutely,absolutely,absolutely,absolutely...
after that is Kf4 then g3 mate
Jul-05-04  PizzatheHut: <blitzkrieg> I don't think it's ...g3+, but ...Rh1#
Aug-22-04  rover: As far as I can see there was nothing wrong with 50.Rd6+ winning the bishop. 50...Kf7 51.Rhxg6 exd2 (e2 Rge6) 52.Rh6
Premium Chessgames Member
  blazerdoodle: 31 move the rook? Is that passed pawn really that dangerous?
Premium Chessgames Member
  blazerdoodle: boy... I'm slow ... 31...Kxh4??? 32 Kf4 and 33 Rh1# = toss me another Choc, Baby Face.
Nov-27-08  patzer of patzers: <rover> I am not contradicting you in the least, but i would like to remind you that in your variation 51. Rhxg6 is check so black cannot even play exd2 or e2 at all.
Nov-27-08  Karpova: <patzer of patzers: <rover> I am not contradicting you in the least, but i would like to remind you that in your variation 51. Rhxg6 is check so black cannot even play exd2 or e2 at all.>

No, it's not check since the black King is on f7 in <rover>'s line.

Nov-27-08  patzer of patzers: Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooops!

I didn't have a clear head yesterday. By the way, <Karpova>, what do YOU think of <rover>'s line?

Nov-28-08  Karpova: I think that it's winning, e. g. to extent <rover>'s line a bit <50.Rd6+ Kf7 51.Rhxg6 exd2 52.Rh6> and if 52...Ra1 to threaten d1=Q then 53.Rh7+ Ke8 (53...Kg8 54.Rc7 or Rb7) and now simply 54.Rhd7.

Well, the line is not hard to find but it's still instructive to see the strong connected white rooks work together and conquer the d2-pawn by threatening mate. The concept itself is important for Rook endings with equal material but more active rooks. See for example Rubinstein vs Chigorin, 1906 where White uses his two rooks to start a mating attack.

Nov-29-08  patzer of patzers: um, 53...Kg8 54. Rc7 d1=Q then what? Sorry, I'm still a beginner...
Nov-29-08  Karpova: <patzer of patzers> Sorry, not (50.Rd6+ Kf7 51.Rhxg6 exd2 52.Rh6 Ra1 53.Rh7+ Kg8) 54.Rc7 as I said but 54.Rhd7 and White wins the d2-pawn and the game with his extra rook.
Nov-29-08  patzer of patzers: hm, that's good! I guess it's now established that black is screwed if 50. Rd6+. But apparently Kxe3 worked out too, and black was hopeless either way.
Premium Chessgames Member
  dernier loup de T: Yes Karpova!! Not 50. 54.... Rc7: even I Iove Karpov too, let's not forget the famous words of Nimzo:" a passed pawn is a mortal enemy which mut be annihilated!!"lol!
Jul-31-19  gambitfan: 1) +132.79 (29 ply) 63.g4 ♔e4 64.♔g3 ♖h8 65.♖a5 ♖f8 66.g5 ♖f5 67.♖a4+ ♔e5 68.♔g4 ♖f2 69.♖a6 ♖g2+ 70.♔h5 ♔f5 71.♖f6+ ♔e4 72.♔h6 ♔e5 73.♖f8 ♖h2+ 74.♔g7 ♖g2 75.g6 ♔e6 76.♖f6+ ♔e7 77.♖f7+ ♔e6 78.♖f8 ♔e7 79.♖f6 ♖g3 80.♖f2 ♔e6 81.♔h7 ♖h3+ 82.♔g8 ♖c3

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Polerio Defense Suhle Defens
from POLERIO DEFENSE by gambitfan
Two Knights Defense. Polerio Defense Suhle Defense
from ANDERSSEN GAMES by gambitfan
from The Chess Champions (Romantic Era) by Owl
Q13 43 +3.3 Rxh4 + 0.0 Rhf1
from sgmf by mughug

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC