< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Oct-02-06 | | Operation Mindcrime: Quintessential Tal. One couldn't expect any less than 16. ♘g6!! from him. |
|
Aug-28-07 | | zev22407: If 17)..Rxf7 18)N-h8! wins |
|
Mar-11-08
 | | chancho: The man seemed to have all the answers when he unleashed his awesome combinations and sacrifices on his bewildered opponents. |
|
Mar-11-08 | | suenteus po 147: This game was played at a Capablanca memorial, was it not? |
|
Mar-11-08
 | | chancho: <suenteus po 147> Indeed it was. |
|
Mar-11-08 | | suenteus po 147: <chancho> Thanks! |
|
Aug-24-08 | | PAWNTOEFOUR: <moonlitKnight> i guess you're right when you call 8...g5?? a blunder...crafty gives the following line pv 8...exd4 9.cxd4 Nc8 10.Nf3 Na5 11.O-O Be7 12.Bc2 <HT> +3 Crafty |
|
May-02-09 | | WhiteRook48: after 28... Qxe4 29 Qg6+ Ke5? 30 Qe6# makes the board look like a painting by Picasso. |
|
Jul-19-14 | | Bartacus: In the final position, a kibitzer pointed out that 28...Qxe4 29 Qe6+ Ke5? 30 Qe6 is mate. A better, but still hopeless try is 29...Ke7, upon which 30 f6+ wins Black's queen. |
|
Nov-11-14
 | | perfidious: How many players would have foreseen the clever quiet move 18.Nd5, depriving the enemy king of flight squares? |
|
May-10-19 | | mikealando: Tal the magnificent |
|
Mar-15-21 | | Gaito: At a cursory glance Black's resignation might seem to be somewhat premature (diagram)
 click for larger view
BLACK TO MOVE
A possible continuation could have been 28...Qxe4 29.Qg6+ Ke7 (if 29...Ke5 30.Qe6 mate) 30.f6+ Bxf6 31.Qxe4+ Re5 32.Qxb7 Rd8 33.Qxc7+ Rd7 34.Qc4 with an overwhelming advantage for White (diagram)
 click for larger view |
|
Mar-15-21 | | Gaito: Where did Black go wrong in this game? There were several "little mistakes" and one or two "big mistakes". The following errors might be pointed out: 9...Rh7? (⌓ 9..d5); then 11...Qc8?! (⌓ ...Na5); and then 12...dxc3? (⌓ ...Ne5). A more serious mistake was 14...Ng8? (⌓ 14...Nd3+).
After those "little errors" Black had already an inferior position, but a "bigger mistake" probably happened in the following position: click for larger view
BLACK TO MOVE
Letelier played 25...Rd5? and that proved to be a serious mistake that changed an otherwise inferior position into a completely lost position. From the diagram, a lesser evil would have been 25...Rad8, e.g. 26.f6 Qh8 27.Qxh8 Rxh8 28.Rxe5 Rh6 (diagram)
 click for larger viewThis double-rook ending would be won by White without much trouble, on account of his material advantage and his passed pawns. |
|
Mar-16-21 | | carpovius: One of the most beautiful human chess game ever seen. |
|
Dec-15-24
 | | perfidious: A lovely combinative effort by le grand maitre, and there is no chance whatever I would have nailed even the early portion of this POTD without recalling the motif from Cafferty's work on Tal from so long ago. |
|
Dec-15-24 | | mel gibson: I saw the first few moves:
Stockfish 17 says:
17. Bxf7+
(17. Bxf7+ (1.Bxf7+ Kxf7 2.Nxe5+ Kf8 3.Ng6+ Kg7 4.0-0 Qd8 5.Rae1 Qg5 6.Qd1 Nf6 7.Qd4 Bc6 8.Re2 b6 9.b4 Rd8 10.Kh1 Rhh8 11.e5 Rhe8 12.Qc4 Bb7 13.exf6+ Qxf6 14.Ne4 Bxe4 ) +2.52/50 577) score for White +2.52 depth 50. |
|
Dec-15-24 | | stacase: After a minute or two I saw what 17.Bxf7+ would do but would have gone for 18.Nxe5+ (++) and grabbed something while White was forced to move his King. I didn't expect 17...Kxf7 allowing the double check. And it took some time to see that on move 28... Black couldn't save his Queen |
|
Dec-15-24
 | | An Englishman: Good Evening: Only flub of the week (saw the first move, but missed the second), so feeling satisfied. On to Monday! |
|
Dec-15-24 | | vajeer: I saw the combination. It's a typical positional sacrifice where you have to play it with a bit of faith apart from calculations in the live game I guess.
After 18. Nxe5+ Kf8 19. Ng6+ Kg7 20. O-O Qd8 21. Rae1 Qg5 22. Qd1 Nf6 23. Qd4 Bc6 24. Re2 Here I was thinking about 24...Re8
 click for larger view
Now after 25.e5 Kg8 26. exd6 Rxe2 27. Qc4+ Rf7 28. Qxe2 cxd6
 click for larger view
Black's pawn structure is in disarray and engine gives it a +2.21 evaluation. But seems that black is capable to fight on. |
|
Dec-15-24 | | cocker: Letelier defended well until 25 ... Rd5? |
|
Dec-15-24
 | | scormus: Another one where I wasn't sure about even the first move. With a bit more thought I should have seen that after 17 Bxf7+, ... Kxf7 is forced. If instead ... Rxf7, 18 Nh8 wins easily. Similarly ... Ke8 18 Bxg8. I thought about 17 Nd5, O-O-O, and O-O, but couldn't see any positive winning chances. I should have realised Bxf7+ was the move for being the most Tal-like, even if the continuing sequence wasn't easy to see. However, I'd have expected at least 18 Nxe5+, with Nd5 likely to follow soon. Curiously, SF took quite some time before finally deciding on 18 Nxe5+ over Nd5 and O-O-O. |
|
Dec-15-24
 | | chrisowen: Irk q its sand cg its op flew its yu Bxf7 ach its match its aoh its jah its a fig pug its chug Bxf7 cinch x |
|
Dec-15-24
 | | HeMateMe: Just walk away, Rene... |
|
Dec-15-24 | | whiteshark: The black position collapsed like a house of cards. |
|
Dec-15-24
 | | chrisowen: Carry the burdin lubbly jubbly |
|
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |