Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Mikhail Tal vs Teodors Zeids
URS (1952)
Slav Defense: Geller Gambit (D15)  ·  1-0



explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Tal/T Zeids games
sac: 24.Rfh4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-26-05  Saruman: Tal didnt show 100% accuracy here since; 29.Nd5! mates in 3 moves. But the game should be remembered for its straightforwardness.
Jan-27-05  Saruman: 18.<f5> and <19.Nf6+> are certainly wo instructive moves. However I am slightly puzzled as to why Tal didnt finish up more quickly with 26.Qxg5.
Jan-27-05  JohnBoy: <Saruman> - you are correct that 26.Qxg5 is quicker. Sometimes we just follow what we already know works, rather than hunting for the most efficient path. Leko commented on this yesterday regarding his draw with Moro.
Jan-28-05  Saruman: <JohnBoy> Agreed 26.Qxg5! Is a bit too demanding task to deal with :-)
Mar-14-06  agressivechess: Is this the first time that Tal employs the Tolush-Geller gambit or was it named sometime after this game was played.I guess Spassky's discovery of 6.Qc2 was made after this game and definately looks more solid than 6.e5 but we are talking Tal here.
Nov-15-15  NeverAgain: This is Game 1 in P.H. Clarke's "Mikhail Tal - Master of Sacrifice" (1961). Here are the annotations, converted to algebraic (my copy, the 1991 Batsford edition, is still in descriptive).

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Tal's attacking style has not sprung from a continual use of gambits of the swashbuckling kind - the King's, Evans or Danish. On the contrary, his opening play tends towards simplicity rather than anything else. However, he was not always above more modern gambits.

If we can see in this game obvious signs of youthful directness, we should also note the force of the final assault, for it was such play that was soon to make him famous.

• 5.e4

Theory (i.e. the sum of our knowledge of the game up to the present moment) does not look upon this sacrifice as fully sound. But in the hands of a strong attacking player it can be a dangerous weapon, and Geller, for instance, has gained a number of successes with it. White gets a strong centre and can look forward to a long tenure of the initiative.

More usual is <5.a4>.

• 7...Nxc3?

This exchange should be withheld until White has played axb5 for reasons explained in the next note.

Of the several different defensive systems at Black's disposal the surest is <7...e6! 8.axb5 Nxc3 9.bxc3 cxb5 10.Ng5! Bb7 11.Qh5 g6 12.Qg4 Be7 13.Be2 Nd7 14.Bf3 Qc8!> (Szabo-Petrosian, Hungary-U.S.S.R. match, Budapest, 1955).

• 8...a6

A very unnecessary move which should have been speedily punished. Again <...e6> was in order, but after <9.Ng5> White's attacking chances are greatly increased by the fact that the long white diagonal remains blocked (by the c6 pawn).

• 9.Be2

Too simple. The thematic sortie - Ng5 - would have immedi­ately rendered Black's position on the K side precarious.

• 9...Bb7

Black seems blissfully unaware of the danger on the other wing. Now White might well create a multitude of possibilities by <10.e6>.

• 10.Ng5

And, of course, this is very good too. The Knight settles on e4, whence it continually menaces the enemy position.

• 10...h6

Unfortunately, if <10...e6>, then <11.Bh5 g6 12.B­f3> leaves Black's K side riddled with holes.

• 12.Ba3

White's attack has not gained any immediate success, but he has various positional plusses to his credit; the forthcoming exchange of Bishops accentuates Black's troubles by exposing the weaknesses on the black squares in his camp.

Nov-15-15  NeverAgain: • 12...Bxa3

There is no use trying to avoid the exchange by <12...c5>. For example, <13.Nxc5 Bxg2 14.Rg1 Bd5 15.Bf3 Bxf3 16.Qxf3 Qd5 17.Ne4>, and White seizes the vital squares just the same.

• 15.f4

click for larger view

Everything is ready for a straight attack, and it is remarkable how powerless Black is to stop it. For instance, the natural freeing move <15...c5> is too slow - <16.Nd6 Bc6 17.f5> with a winning position.

The only chance lay in <...f6> (or <...f5>) either on this or the next move, hoping to gain some space in which to maneuvre. Even in that case Black's game would be markedly inferior because after <exf6> his K side is weak, whilst his pawn majority on the other side is of no significance.

• 16...Nb6?

Transferring the Knight to quite the wrong side of the board; while this leads to some more material gains Tal quickly shows that these are entirely irrelevant.

• 17.Qd2! Nxa4
• 18.f5

The storm breaks. Relatively best is now <18...f6>, though after <19.exf6 gxf6 20.Rae1> White should win comfortably.

• 18...exf5

click for larger view

• 19.Nf6+

The point of this sort of sacrifice is that, if it is accepted, the doubled pawns (here tripled) prevent the defending pieces from coming to the aid of their King: <19...gxf6 20.Qxh6 fxe5 21.R­b3! f4 (or <<21...f6 22.Rg3+ Kf7 23.R­g7+>>) 22.Rh3 f6 23.Qh8+ Kf7 24.Rh7+>, etc.

• 20...Rfd8

White threatened <21.Rh5> followed by <Rxh6+>; this may now be defended by <...Qf8>.

• 21...Bc8

Black is without resource. What­ ever he does (within reason!), White adopts the same winning procedure.

• 23...Nxc3

A desperate throw which Tal ig­nores, thus adding insult to injury.

• 25...g5

Otherwise <26.Rxh6+> is decisive anyway.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Tal !
from Chess gives joy and insight ......... by arielbekarov
Tal Fever
by chocobonbon
Slav Defense: Geller Gambit
from adichess' Slave by adichess
A knight on f6 that....was white
from Tal´s best attacks with sacrifices by Lyink
Slav Defense: Geller Gambit
by Determinacy
Tal's Winning Combination And Sacrifices
by tal7
P.H. Clarke: Mikhail Tal's best games 1951-60
by backrank
from bennyesquire's favorite games by bennyesquire
Latvian Championship Quarterfinal 1952
from Tal's Tournament and Matches 1949-1973 by jessicafischerqueen
bishop sac
from Combinations by wwall
The QGD/Slav/Semi-Slav
by Zhbugnoimt
Never_Again's analysis
by NeverAgain
bishop sac
from Combinations by Jaredfchess
G1 in P.H. Clarke's "Mikhail Tal - Master of Sacrifice" (1961)
from Talented Indeed is a FTB Understatement by fredthebear
Slav Defense [Geller Gambit]
by ALL
G1 in P.H. Clarke's "Mikhail Tal - Master of Sacrifice" (1961)
from Publications by Year and Unconfirmed Source 11 by fredthebear
Latvian Championship Quarterfinal 1952
from Tal's Tournament and Matches 1949-1973 by Bokke
78 The QGD Slav/Semi-Slav
by Littlejohn
Latvian Championship Quarterfinal 1952
from "Tal's Tournament and Matches 1949-1973" per JFQ by Littlejohn

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC