Fusilli: <Chessical> <Steinitz is frustratingly close, but never quite close enough to a win> Actually, Nunn gives two missed wins for Steinitz in <John Nunn's Chess Course>  click for larger view
Here 27.Nxf5 is stronger than 27.Rxb7+, and it wins. After 27...Kf6 (best defense) Nunn writes <now the most convincing win is by the attractive 28.Rd5!> Quite a difficult move to see before playing 27.Nxf5, and also after. Against 27.Rxb7+, Lasker should have most definitely played 27...Kf6 instead of taking the rook. Why let white attack with a recapture with check, when getting the king out of the way now can gain black a tempo? Nunn writes: <The key point here is that by refusing the sacrificed rook Black gains a tempo for his own counterplay and makes it harder for White to break down the pawn-chain defending the black king.> Of course, Nunn gives the lines in the book. After 28...Kf6:
 click for larger view29.Nxe6, Steinitz move, is strong, but with 29.Nxf5 <white could have won more simply> (This is really not a missed win, as White is still winning.) Nunn gives <29...Rae8 (after 29...exf5 30.Qc6+ Kf7 31.Bb3+ Kf8 32.Rd7 White mates quickly) 30.Rd7 Rhf8 31.Nd4 with overwhelming threats; one line is 31...Qh5 32.Rh7 Rf7 33.Rxh5 Rxb7 34.Rxh2 winning material. The other missed win is in the next move. After 29...Qg8:
 click for larger view
30.Nd4. Nunn writes <With this move, White finally throws the win away. It looks wrong to block the d-file, and concrete analysis shows that White could have won by 30.Nf4! Bxf4 (30...Qc4+ 31.Bd3 Qf7 32.Qa6+ Kg5 33.Bc4 and White wins easily) 31.Bb3 Rh1+ 32.Ke2 (32. Qxh1 Qxb3 33.Qc6+! also wins but it is more complicated) and Black must surrender his queen.> About that <White wins easily> in the line in parenthesis, I was a bit puzzled, and had to ask the computer what happens if 33...Qe8: [Analysis diagram]
 click for larger viewCan you see it?
Well... what happens is 34.Rd7!
Overall, an insanely tactical middle game. And of course, Nunn analyzed with the benefit of a computer. Too bad that Steinitz missed the win. This was the fifth game of that match and he had lost the first four. It would have been nice for his morale. |