chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Savielly Tartakower vs Akiba Rubinstein
Moscow (1925), Moscow URS, rd 20, Dec-06
Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid (C28)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 17 times; par: 59 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 28 more Tartakower/Rubinstein games
sac: 31.Rxg7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-27-12  kunjankp: i think 13...f5 was b8r than 13...f6. can anyone tell me if I am wrong or right?!
Mar-02-19  JimNorCal: No doubt about it, Tartakover had real talent!
There must have been days when he was sorry to live during a time of giants: Lasker, Capablanca and Alekhine.

Otherwise, he might have been World Champion

Aug-22-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Already knew this one, but still enjoyed replaying the game.
Aug-22-19  Cheapo by the Dozen: Many choices win at Move 34. My plan was to move the queen to e-file, so as to wind up ahead in material. Then as I checked the game, I saw that an immediate f6 worked comparably well.

I never got around to seeing that the game move, which protects the advancing f-pawn, was much better than either of those choices.

Aug-22-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Once: Deja vu
Aug-22-19  groog: Rather easy for a Thursday
Aug-22-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  agb2002: I know this classical (in every aspect) game.
Aug-22-19  stacase: I went move for move until 37.f7. I would have moved 37.fxe7 which probably still wins.
Aug-22-19  Lambda: I saw 34. Qe2 and then advancing the f-pawn, which goes into an ending a pawn up, which is enough to justify the continuation. You can think again after moves like 33...Qxe8 to see if you can find anything even better.
Aug-22-19  mel gibson: I didn't guess right.
Stockfish 10 says:

31. Rxg7

(31. Rxg7
(♖g3xg7 ♖e7xg7 ♘h5xf6 ♕d7-e7 ♘f6xe8 ♖g7-g8 ♕f2-f4 ♖g8xe8 f5-f6 ♕e7-e6 ♕f4-g5 ♖e8-g8 ♕g5xe5 ♕e6xe5 ♖e4xe5 ♖g8-f8 ♖e5-e6 h7-h5 ♖e6xc6 ♔h8-g8 ♔h1-g1 ♔g8-f7 ♖c6-c7+ ♔f7xf6 ♖c7xa7 ♖f8-e8 ♔g1-f2 ♖e8-f8 ♖a7-a4 ♔f6-e6+ ♔f2-g1 ♔e6-d7 g2-g3 ♔d7-d6 ♖a4-h4 ♖f8-e8 ♔g1-f2 ♖e8-h8 b3-b4 ♖h8-h6 b4-b5 ♖h6-f6+ ♔f2-e2 ♖f6-e6+ ♔e2-f3 ♖e6-h6 ♔f3-g2 ♖h6-e6 ♖h4-e4 ♖e6-h6 ♖e4-f4 ♔d6-d7 ♖f4-h4 ♖h6-e6 ♔g2-f2 ♖e6-f6+ ♔f2-e3 ♖f6-g6 ♖h4xh5 ♖g6xg3+ ♔e3-d2 ♖g3-g6) +4.36/45 165)

score for White +4.36 depth 45

Aug-22-19  saturn2: My choice was
31. Rxg7 Rxg7 32. Nxf6 Qd8 33. Nxe8 Qxe8 34. f6 Rf7 35. Qe3
Aug-22-19  patzer2: Black's decisive error appears to be 30...Kh8, allowing today's Thursday puzzle solution 31. Rxg7! +-.

Necessary instead is 30...Rf8 31. Kg1 ± (+1.00 @ 42 ply, Stockfish 10) when Black has practical drawing chances in a complicated position.

Earlier in the opening, I prefer 4...Na5 as in Black's win in Naiditsch vs Caruana, 2017.

Aug-22-19  cunctatorg: It's way harder than medium; not insane but hard!!
Aug-22-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: 31.? White to play (and win!)

This famous combination was played in a famous game from the famed tournament in Moscow, 1925.

White's famous opponent, Rubinstein, had famously been a world champion contender in the previous decade.

Playing the White pieces was the soon-to-be-famous Savielly Tartakower, who also co-authored a famous chess book with his not-so-famous co-author, DuMond, (or was it DuMont?):

<500 Master Games>

Aug-22-19  TheaN: Despite the common knowledge of this game itself, the puzzle is not terribly hard either.

This one solves itself by deduction: you want the knight on f6, only g7 defends f6, after Rxg7, Nxf6 and Qf4 White wins all the material back and pushes through. Simplified version, but it works.

Aug-22-19  NBZ: It's important to see that after 34. Qf4 Re7 35. f6 Re6 36. Rxe5! wins: 36. ... Rxe5 37. f7 Re1+ 38. Kh2 Qf8 39. Qf6+ Qg7 40. f8=Q#.

Not seeing this idea of 36. Rxe5, I went for the inferior line 34. f6, which wins back the knight but gives up the f6 pawn. White is still a lot better, but it is not anything as easily winning as the game.

Aug-22-19  JimNorCal: No doubt about it, Tartakover had real talent!

There must have been days when he was sorry to live during a time of giants: Lasker, Capablanca and Alekhine.

Otherwise, he might have been World Champion.

Oh wait. I already said that this year.

Aug-23-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <JimNorCal>

It’s a silly thing to say any time. Tartakower was a fine player and a great chess writer, but he was never a threat to be world champion at any point during his 50-year career, and I can’t think of any time in chess history when he would have been a threat. See for yourself.

http://www.chessmetrics.com/cm/CM2/...

Aug-23-19  JimNorCal: <key>, your chart shows Savielly as #2 in the world in 1921 behind Rubinstein IF you remove Capa.

I'd consider that WC potential.

No way did ST ever outmatch Capa, Lasker or AA. But he could hold his own against the rest of the pack. He "coulda been a contender", as they say in the movies.

Aug-23-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <9 JimNorCal: <key>, your chart shows Savielly as #2 in the world in 1921 behind Rubinstein IF you remove Capa.>

Yes, at a time when chessmetrics ratings were meaningless because of the shutdown in international chess caused by World War I. By that point Lasker and Alekhine were markedly stronger than Rubinstein and Bogoljubow was roughly as good. Any of them would have been heavy favorites against Tartakower, Maroczy or Vidmar would have been even money, and of course let’s not even speak of Capablanca.

Aug-25-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: I should have noted that Spielmann beat Tartakower in a match in 1921.
Aug-26-19  JimNorCal: <keypusher>:"I should have noted ..."

You should have noted that with Capa, Lasker and Alekhine on the scene, Tartakover had no realistic chance to be World Champ. If you imagine a chess world without those three, ST could conceivably have made it.

Aug-26-19  JimNorCal: Tartakover was competitive with Spielmann.

LIFETIME RECORD:
Classical games: Savielly Tartakower beat Rudolf Spielmann 18 to 14, with 29 draws

Ignoring draws, ST won their final decisive encounter. RS won the 3 previous games (1925 and 1926) while ST won the 3 before that (1923). The point being: Tartakover did not run up a plus score early which drained away after Spielmann hit his peak. No, they were competitive throughout.

Aug-26-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <JimNorCal: Tartakover was competitive with Spielmann. >

You've now moved the goalposts so far that they're no longer in the stadium. And Tartakower is as far from being a threat to the world title as ever.

Aug-28-19  JimNorCal: "moved the goalposts"

Not at all, dear keypusher.
My contention: 1) with Lasker, Capa, AA in the mix it is unrealistic for GM Tartakover to dream of ever being World Champion. 2) without them, Tartakover was a valid contender.

You mentioned Spielmann as beating ST in a match. I responded that their overall record was competitive, indeed, ST held the edge.

You mentioned ChessMetrics showed ST never being at the top. I pointed out that ST was second highest at one point (if Capa is dropped).

With the Big Three to one side, Tartakover is clearly in the small group of likely WC contenders. How can this opinion possibly be considered silly?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
31.? (Sunday, May 9)
from POTD Vienna by Patca63
I/61 - Demolishment
from My Best Games of Chess, 1905-1954 by Tartakower by Chessdreamer
A very instructive game that shows the power of the passed pawn
from GreenDayGuy's favorite games by GreenDayGuy
31. ?
from Sunday Puzzles by chessgames.com
Game 68 in My Best Games of Chess, 1905-1954 by Tartakower
from Publications by Year and Unconfirmed Source 11 by fredthebear
It is better to sacrifice to your oppenent men.
from Caturanga's favorite games by Caturanga
bengalcat47's favorite games3
by bengalcat47
31.? (Sunday, May 9)
from Puzzle of the Day 2004 by Phony Benoni
Clear-cut, well-played game w/subtle kingside attack
from Carl Schlechter and Akiba Rubinstein Games by fredthebear
Game 68 in My Best Games of Chess, 1905-1954 by Tartakower
from Pins Ins and Outs, ECO C 20s, 40s, 50s, 60s-90s by rbaglini
Middlegame Combinations by Peter Romanovsky
by hms123
31.? (May 9, 2004)
from Sunday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Jaredfchess
Combination - move 31 - attack on king
from Various games by paladin at large
Bent Larsen's Good Move Guide: 2 Find the Plan
by Rio Mike
31. Rxg7! solves a Saturday puzzle
from Combined Operations by patzer2
Middlegame Combinations by Peter Romanovsky
from Decoy to, Deflect from, Remove Fredthebear 4 by trh6upsz
Middlegame Combinations by Peter Romanovsky
by igiene

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC