chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Mikhail Tal vs Tony Miles
Riga Interzonal (1979), Riga URS, rd 16, Sep-27
Sicilian Defense: Canal Attack. Main Line (B52)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more Tal/Miles games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-26-07  tal lover: Tal outplayed Miles in the endgame, probably w/ the best play it should be a draw after the game became a rook endgame
Jun-12-08  dTal: i'm not so sure, tal played a very fine endgame and he transitioned with a clear advantage
Feb-09-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: One would have thought that, after Tal's 23rd move, even with an extra pawn in the double rook ending, his winning chances were small; but this game provides an object example of the idea that in such endings, in which both sides possess weaknesses, active play is of utmost importance.
Mar-12-21  carpovius: <perfidious > Not at all. One has thought that 23...Rac8 was the loosing move. Very sorry.
Mar-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  g15713: E. 1.0
Black to move at 23


click for larger view

Chess 'User: perfidious comments: <"One would have thought that, after Tal's 23rd move, even with an extra pawn in the double rook ending, his winning chances were small; but this game provides an object example of the idea that in such endings, in which both sides possess weaknesses, active play is of utmost importance.">

Stockfish gives the following analysis after 25-minute evaluation

1) =0.00 (42 ply) 23...Re6 24.Kg2 Rae8 25.Re1 Rh6 26.Rd5 Rf6 27.e5 dxe5 28.Rexe5 Ref8 29.Re2 Rf4 30.Rc5 Rg4+ 31.Kh3 Rff4 32.Rc8+ Kf7 33.Rb2 Rh4+ 34.Kg3 Rhg4+ 35.Kh3

2) =0.00 (42 ply) 23...Re5 24.Rf5 Rxf5 25.exf5 Rc8 26.h6 gxh6 27.Kf2 Kf7 28.Ke3 Rc5 29.Kd3 Ke7 30.Re4+ Kf7 31.Re6 d5 32.cxd5 Rxd5+ 33.Ke4 Ra5 34.Rxh6 Rxa4+ 35.Ke5 Ra5+ 36.Kf4 Rxa2 37.Rxh7+ Kf6 38.Rxb7 Ra4+ 39.Kg3 Kxf5 40.Rf7+ Kg6 41.Rc7 Ra2 42.h4 Ra3+ 43.Kg4 Ra4+ 44.Kh3 Ra3+ 45.Kg4

3) +0.08 (41 ply) 23...Rac8 24.h6 gxh6 25.Rf6 Re7 26.Rfxd6 Rce8 27.Rd8 Rxe4 28.Rxe8+ Rxe8 29.Kf2 h5 30.Kf3 Re7 31.Rd5 h4 32.h3 Kf7 33.c5 Kg6 34.Kf4 Kf7 35.Kf5 Ke8 36.Rd4 Rc7 37.Rxh4 Rxc5+ 38.Ke6 Rc6+ 39.Kd5 h6 40.Rb4 Rc7 41.Rb2 Kd8 42.h4 Kc8 43.Rb6 Rc2 44.Rxh6 Rxa2 45.Rh8+ Kd7

Line 3 could continue 46. h5 Rxa4 and one has

E. 1.1
White to move


click for larger view

Syzygy says it is a tablebase draw
'https://syzygy-tables.info/?fen=7R/...

Game continued:
23...Rac8 24.Rb1 Rc5 25.Rxb7

E. 1.2
Black to move at 25


click for larger view

Computer annotated analysis says better is
25...Rf8 26.Rb2 Rf6 27.Rf2 Re6 28.h6 gxh6 29.Kg2 Ra5 = +0.18 (28) ply

Game continued:
25...Rxh5 26.Rxd6 Rf8 27.Rb3

E. 1.3
Black to move at 27


click for larger view

I would have preferred 27...Rg5+ 28. Rg3 Ra5

E. 1.4
White to move


click for larger view

Stockfish gives the following analysis after 25-minute evaluation

1) +0.55 (35 ply) 29.Rc6 g6 30.a3 Rf4 31.Rc8+ Kg7 32.Rc7+ Kf6 33.Rxh7 Rxe4 34.Rc7 Rxa4 35.Rc6+ Re6 36.Rxe6+ Kxe6 37.Kf2 Ke7 38.Kg2 a5 39.Kh3 Rxc4 40.Rxg6

Syzygy says it is now a tablebase draw
'https://syzygy-tables.info/?fen=8/4...

Game continued with 27...Rh4 28.Rd4 Rg4+ 29.Rg3 Rgf4 30.h3

E. 1.5
Black to move


click for larger view

Stockfish gives the following analysis after 25-minute evaluation

1) +0.18 (34 ply) 30...Rf1+ 31.Kh2 Rc1 32.Rg5 Rc3 33.Kg2 Rb8 34.Rf5 h5 35.Rd2 Rxc4 36.Re2 h4 37.a5 Re8 38.Kf3 Re6 39.Rf4 Ra4 40.Rxh4 Ra3+ 41.Kf4 Kf7 42.Rh5 Rf6+ 43.Kg4 Rg6+ 44.Kh4 Rgg3 45.Rc5 Rxh3+ 46.Kg5 Ke6 47.Rg2 Kd6 48.Rd5+ Ke6 49.Rg4 Rh6 50.Kf4 Rf6+ 51.Kg5 Rxa2

Game continued with 30...g6 and Black eventually lost;
23...Rac8 was not the losing move.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC