chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Bent Larsen vs Murray Chandler
"Snake Chandler" (game of the day Sep-17-2010)
Hastings (1987/88), Hastings ENG
Reti Opening: Advance Variation (A09)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 16 times; par: 77 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 8 more Larsen/Chandler games
sac: 19.Qxa8 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-17-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  musicmanTRIBALx: did you mean 38. Bd5 Qxd5+ 39. cxd5
Sep-17-10  syracrophy: <musicmanTRIBALx: did you mean 38. Bd5 Qxd5+ 39. cxd5> LOL!!! I didn´t see it was check! xD Anyways, 39.cxd5 was much more simple :) Thanks for pointing that out
Sep-17-10  dzechiel: Sensational ending!
Sep-17-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: What a finish!
Sep-17-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  coachjay: If you have been looking at Larsen games all week, have you noticed how he often repeats a move in many of his games? Interesting mind game or just trying to gain time on the clock? What a unique style Larsen had!
Sep-17-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Once: This is the position with white to play:


click for larger view

White wants to keep his powerful bishop on d5 but he is facing two threats: Rxa3 and Nxd5.

His answer is to give up his queen for rook and knight and neutralise both threats. 19. Qxa8 is a fantastic move that most patzers would run a mile from. But it gives white the aforementioned strong bishop, an aggressively placed rook on a8, a pin on the black Bc8, a half open file for the Rb1...

Stunning stuff. The mate isn't too shoddy either!

Sep-17-10  Ferro: Bony & Clide
Sep-17-10  Ferro: Parece Tarzan
Sep-17-10  nuwanda:

truely a fantastic game, especially the finish. but i have the impression that black played just to passive after the queen sacrifice. why not exchange white's strong bishop after 22.Bxb7? and normally the side with the queen gets tremendous resources once he is able to open up the position and activate his pieces, even at the cost of further material.

my thoughts are running along something like:

22...Bxb7 23.Rxe8+ Qxe8 24.Rxb7 Qa8 25.Re7 e4

arent things getting a little muddy here?

Sep-17-10  Garech: Fantastic game, I think my favourite Larsen victory of all time. RIP Bent, you were a legend!
Sep-17-10  shakespeare: The headlines has been "The great Dane died" - and he was truly great - I always enjoyed his games but didn't know this one - absolutely phantastic!

what may his opponent be at the moment? Fischer, Spassky...

Sep-17-10  ChessLlama: R.I.P Mr. Larsen. This game is just genius!
Sep-17-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  johnlspouge: The game has a beautiful positional sacrifice in 19.Qxa8. I found it interesting to play the moves with Toga evaluating all the way. The computer thinks White is behind after the sacrifice, about -0.4 P. It then suggests moves for each side (which I entered at about 15 ply). The pattern follows the game: Black tries a K-side attack, going nowhere, while White's Q-side infiltration becomes harder to ignore, until Black collapses. The computer becomes convinced, rather stubbornly, that Larsen's sacrifice was winning!
Sep-17-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Funny,a lot of the play was along the edges of the board and not through the center-as is usual in chess.
Sep-17-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Chandler:The hills are alive with the sound OF MUSIC.
Sep-17-10  iamsheaf: <nuwanda> White can get better position than the line that you offered. for instance, after 22..Bxb7 White can play Rxb7 (Qf8 Raa7) Qxb7 Rxe8+ and the e5 is falling.
Sep-17-10  CapablancaFan122: In the final position Bf5+ is mate as well. I like how the queen is just standing there, watching as its monarch is hopelessly entangled in the corner of the board.
Sep-17-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  joe1137: Sorry, you need to take the rook first.

22. . . . Bxb7
23. Rxb7 Qxb7
24. Rxe8+ Kg7
25. Nxe5

and white is fine

Sep-17-10  benjaminpugh: Yea, but if Bf5# then you don't get the Rook involved. More artistic to have as many pieces as possible involved in the mate.
Sep-17-10  drnooo: this game was a misprint: actually
white was Tal here. wasnt it?
oh maybe not. No, now that I look at
the photo of Chandler and his opponent, yep it can't be Tal, he was never blonde. Move over Mikhail.

Seriously folks I wonder whom else but Tal would have played the sac. Fischer? probably not, Petrosian? again, likely not. Keres? Maybe. Alekhine? Maybe. Korchnoi. Nope.
Karpov? No. Kasparov, a dubious yes.
Botvinnik? gimme a break Smyslov?
nope. Bronstein? Absolutely, he would ripped the rook off almost faster than Larsen. But you gotta admit this sac is pretty close to being in a league all its own.

Sep-18-10  nuwanda: hi <iamsheaf>,

i think you're right. looks like the sacrifice was just strong.

greets, nuwanda

Dec-10-10  Eduardo Bermudez: pretty mate !!
Oct-12-12  Shams: Is this Larsen's last, best game? I can't recall seeing anything post-1987 this impressive. Murray Chandler was near his peak this year, but he had no answer for Larsen on this day. I love how White vacates the Kingside so baldly, in the face of Black's e5-f5 pawn pair. Larsen saw that because of his LSB, his queenside play would quickly spread to dominate the center, and Black would have no time to rush his pawns forward.
Oct-14-12  Everett: <Shams> ten years later, one of his very best games, and one of my favorites of all-time.

P H Nielsen vs Larsen, 1997

Mar-07-15  newzild: Some notes on this game after running it through Stockfish. The silicon monster doesn't like Larsen's sacrifice, which it says gives up a 0.5 pawn advantage:

Stockfish agrees with Chandler’s 17...Nc7, even after a good 1-2 minutes of thinking, giving an evaluation of +0.5 in White's favour.

Stockfish dislikes Larsen’s plan of 18. Bd5+ followed by 19. Qxa8 (=), preferring the simple 18. Qb2 (+0.5). In other words, the programme thinks the sacrifice was unsound.

After 20. Rxa8, Chandler’s 20...Bh6? wastes a crucial tempo (+0.7) that should have been spent on queenside defence. Instead, Stockfish gives several lines leading to equality, including 19...b6 20. Bb7 Qc7 21. Bxc8 Rxc8 23. Rxc8 Qxc8 (=) and 20...Qe7 21. Bxb7 Be6 22. Rxe8+ Qxe8 23. Bd5 Kg8 (=).

The next significant mistake was Chandler’s 26...gxh4, after which he is probably lost (+2.4). Instead, 26...g4 would have restricted White’s advantage to little more than an edge (+0.3).

From 33. Rb7 onwards, White plays perfectly, according to Stockfish.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 26 in Excelling at Chess by Jacob Aagaard
from 7 Comes Before 11 Starting @12:00 FTB's time by fredthebear
LAST COLLECTION
by iking
LAST COLLECTION
by Jaredfchess
othjali's favorite games
by othjali
Game 19
from # New in Chess Book of Chess Improvement by skisuitof12
Chess as an art form. Part 2
by hatter81
Larsen got the Tal bug
from yiotta's favorite games by yiotta
shakman's favorite games - 2
by shakman
Reti-ish
by cgrob
Selected checkmates
by Chessdreamer
Game 26
from Excelling at Chess (Aagaard) by howardb86
Réti Beoni
from The Réti System by nkvd
Reti Opening
from Games by Opening by chessbuzz
Master of Attack--Best Games of Bent Larsen
by Ron
Reti Gambit/Reverse Benoni (A09) 1-0 White tears up queenside
from Black Double Fianchettos In Process by Jersey Joe
Game 26 in Excelling at Chess by Jacob Aagaard
from Published Games by Year & Unconfirmed Source 3 by fredthebear
September 17: Snake Chandler
from Game of the Day 2010 by Phony Benoni
My favorite Larsen game
from Nova's favorite games by Nova

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC