Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Paul Keres vs Boris Spassky
"Don't Worry b-Happy" (game of the day Apr-09-2017)
Spassky - Keres Candidates Quarterfinal (1965), Riga URS, rd 4, Apr-11
Spanish Game: Closed Variations. Smyslov Defense (C93)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 26 more Keres/Spassky games
sac: 28...Qxe5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-09-08  DrGridlock: <Rama: This is the first e-pawn game of the match.>

This is game 4 of the match. Keres had the white pieces in the even games, Spassky in the odd games. This is the first e-pawn game - if you don't count game 2, where the opening was also a Ruy Lopez - Smyslov defense.

Keres won game 1 (as black in a Queen's Indian), Game 2 was drawn (with Kere's e4 opening move resulting in the Ruy Lopez - Smyslov), game 3 was a Spassky victory, playing White in a Nimzo Indian - Leningrad. The match was tied with Keres playing the White pieces for game 4. Keres deviated from the game 2 move order at move 12, playing Nf1 instead of a3, and Spassky's victory gave him the lead in the match. Spassky played the white pieces in game 5, and won another Ruy Lopez. His 2-point lead after 5 games pretty much decided the 10 game match.

May-09-09  kurtdereli: 35.. Qg3 is very good maneuver
Oct-28-10  Ulhumbrus: Irving Chernev annotates this game in his book "The golden dozen"

With White's King on the black square g1, 35...Qg3 threatens 35...Qxf2+ 36 Qxf2 Bxf2+ with check so that in reply White cannot leave the bishop alone and stop Black's a pawn by 37 Nc3

Keres plays 36 Kf1 so that on 36...Qxf2+ 37 Qxf2 Bxf2 won't be check, making 38 Nc3 possible.

Spassky then forces White's King back on to a black square by 36..Qd3+

With 37 Ke1 White's King is on a black square again so that 37... Qd4 threatens once more 38...Qxf2+ 39 Qxf2 Bxf2 with check so that White can't ignore the B and play 40 Nc3 ro stop Black's a pawn.

With Black's Queen on d4 Keres can't play his K back to the white square f1 as then on 38 Kf1 Qd1 is mate, and 38 Ne3 is not adequate as 38...Qb2! wins.

If at move 37 the White King goes to the black square g1 instead by 37 Kg1, 37...Qd4 will threaten still 37..Qxf2+ 38 Qxf2 Bxf2 (with check and so preventing 39 Nc3 to stop Black's a pawn). On 38 Kf1 Qd1 will be mate, and 38 Ne3 will have lose to 38...Qb2.

One difference is that with his K on g1 instead of on e1 White has the option of letting the f pawn go by 38 Kh1, but then both 38..Qb2 and 38...Qxf2 seem to win.

The move 38 Qb3 is probably an act of desperation or of despair, seeing no answer to the threat of 38...Qxf2+ 39 Qxf2 Bxf2 with check whereupon White can't play 40 Nc3 to keep Blac's a pawn back.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Marmot PFL: Maybe this was yet another game that Keres was ordered to lose>


Do you believe that the Soviet authoritites figured Keres would have beaten Petrosian for the title in 1966?

Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Show me the hard evidence that Keres was ever "ordered to lose" a game.
Sep-13-11  jakaiden: Just because there is no "hard evidence" doesn't mean it didn't happen. You sound like one of the Casey Anthony jurors.
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Data>

The burden of proof is on the claimant. This is especially important for chess history, which is riddled with innuendo, half-truths, rumor, and unsubstantiated lore. As a TV "Spock substitute" I'd assume you to be familiar with this logic.

I know what you mean though, this kind of charge has been made concerning other Masters within the Soviet system as well.

I think "where there's smoke" there is usually some fire, and we certainly have Bronstein and Korchnoi leveling charges against the Soviet Chess Committee in some of their writings.

But as <keypusher> once pointed out to me with regard to Bronstein, you can't necessarily believe him just because he wrote it in a book.

Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Here is an example of bona fide chess history writing on this controversy by <Taylor Kingston>, one of the best chess historians we have.

He cares about quaint notions such as "hard evidence" and "facts."

He has also done a great deal of hard work to discover the *actual* state of evidence in this controversy, both sides of it.

<The Keres-Botvinnik Case Revisited: A Further Survey of the Evidence>

Taylor Kingston

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <jess> This article, as well as the first by Taylor Kingston, looks solid, though I've always had questions in my mind about the whole business. With all the principals long dead, barring the release of documents from some hitherto unavailable source, this is what we've got.

As to Kingston himself, we were members of the same club for a while in the 1990s, and I assure you that his attitude was rather less objective in what he wrote regarding other chess topics.

Apr-08-15  A.T PhoneHome: I don't think <Marmot PFL> was being serious with his remark. Now I don't know if he is a Botvinnik basher but I didn't take his statement as a real accusation.

I myself have got the feeling that authors like to write about Keres' not-so-good games with a tragical undertone. Like "he doesn't feel normal" or words to that effect. How could they possibly know how Keres is feeling? (Keres was the man with a golden heart, I respect him)

I think <Marmot PFL> was being sarcastic (he quoted Chernev and THEN he said that "Maybe this was yet another game that Keres was ordered to lose.")

And yes, I know this argument is some years old and I wasn't originally any part of it. Just wanted to offer my opinion.

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I don't understand the pun.
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: 'b' is Boris. He's happy because he won. The pun is also a song title of a hit pop song, I think from the 90s.
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <HeMateMe> I know the song, but I didn't make the connection between "b-" and Boris. Pretty lame pun if you ask me.
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: it is a bit weak, not really a pun.
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: excellent game, though. Spassky was a bear, in the middle game.
Apr-09-17  Pawn N Hand: <FSR> allusion to the first letter of Spassky's first name conveniently buttresses the pun's allusion to black's b-pawn - which could be said to win this game's MVP(awn) award
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: the black pawn was on the 'a' file.
Apr-09-17  norami: Yeah, but it started on the 'b' file. Those pun makers don't fool around!
Apr-09-17  catlover: "Don't Worry—Be Happy" is a Bob Marley song.
Apr-09-17  Boomie: Could be Marley but more likely McFerrin, who had a #1 hit with it.

Apr-09-17  catlover: <Boomie> Yeah, I got my wires crossed. McFerrin's hit was the one I was thinking of.
Apr-09-17  theodor: <<jessicafischerqueen>: Show me the hard evidence that Keres was ever "ordered to lose" a game.> - 38.Qb3
Jun-01-18  Nietzowitsch: <theodor: <<jessicafischerqueen>: Show me the hard evidence that Keres was ever "ordered to lose" a game.> - 38.Qb3>

You have a point there.

Jun-19-20  carpovius: Everything was ordered by Communist Party in Soviet Union. Especially chess loses and wins. Sure! Pure mind people believed, believe and will believe so. But, why so many brilliant chess players were born, raised and shined in the USSR? Maybe because they were more intelligent and deeply understand that ancient game than Western players. Of course, a statement difficult to accept...
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: < Nietzowitsch: <theodor: <<jessicafischerqueen>: Show me the hard evidence that Keres was ever "ordered to lose" a game.> - 38.Qb3> You have a point there.>

I assume he was making a joke, not a point. There is no defense to the threats of ...Qb2 and ...Qxf2+, ...Bxf2+, ...a2 and the pawn queens.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 44
from Miroslav Filip - All World Is Learning From Them by Honza Cervenka
gm 4 1965 Canidates quarter finals
from The Canidates Matches by Poisonpawns
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by jakaiden
Candidates Quarterfinals Game #4
from Road to the Championship - Boris Spassky by suenteus po 147
Boris Spassky's Best Games
by KingG
Round 4
from WCC Index [Spassky-Keres 1965] by Hesam7
Top Gun
from kuna65's favorite games by kuna65
Riga ctm (11.04.65) 1965
from Favorite Games from (1960-1979) by wanabe2000
Match Spassky!
by amadeus
The Ruy Lopez
by chessman95
Match Keres!
by amadeus
Game 16
from Move by Move - Spassky (Franco) by Qindarka
pawn grinds down white's queen
from Chess strategy by obrit
Space Invaders
by Gottschalk
Keres vs World Champs Decisive Games Spassky
from Keres vs World & Almost Champions Decisive Games by visayanbraindoctor
Ruy Lopez
by ISeth
Boris Spassky's Best Games
by PassedPawnDuo
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by PassedPawnDuo
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by JoseTigranTalFischer
Power Chess - Spassky
by Anatoly21
plus 31 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC