Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Nigel Short vs Garry Kasparov
Immopar Rapid (1990) (rapid), Paris FRA, May-20
Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack. Tal Gambit (B21)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 19 times; par: 109 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 91 more Short/Kasparov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-08-05  Ger7ry: I look at the position after 21 moves, and I say, how is White going to win this? He's down a bishop for a knight, he has two isolated pawns - how can White possibly win this game. Then, he does. Did Short really mess up the endgame, or is it just that my evaluation is way off?
Nov-30-05  KingG: <Did Short really mess up the endgame> You mean Kasparov.

I don't really understand how Black managed to lose this endgame either.

May-31-06  zev22407: The powerful knight at d5 dominates the end game
Nov-26-06  ToTheDeath: Nice endgame by Short.
Sep-26-08  Whitehat1963: Excellent game. Should become a Game of the Day sometime.
Oct-13-08  MEISTERBRAU: 51...Rc6 is a 100% GK blunder! ...Rb6 would have
made it .but the position is lost anyway.
Mar-28-09  william willson: I don't see the point of 36. ...Rb2
can anyone enlighten me?
Mar-28-09  chillowack: 36...Rb2 looks like an attempt to get some activity, after playing passively and allowing White to gain complete control of the position. The idea is to use the rook to check the White king from behind, and also to attack the a-pawn from the rear. The alternative is just to slowly die.

Short's strategy was sound: he traded queens, thus de-fanging Kasparov. He got a good knight vs. bad bishiop endgame, and he played it correctly. His isolated pawns weren't such a problem, because the king can shepherd them while the rook and knight go on hunting expeditions in Black's camp.

Mar-28-09  WhiteRook48: bad bishops!
Has anyone noticed that there are more bad bishops than good bishops?
Jul-13-09  totololo: Consider the isolated pawns as support central posts for the knight. With the rook on board the central post is protected by the excellent manoevre Rf6-a6 that blocks the queen side.

It is interesting that the same strategy that Short delivered in this game will be applied by K. in a Najdorf years later when all black pawns seem scattered but they are formidable outposts for the knight. Still rooks were available on the board.

VERY , VERY , Interesting ending strategy!

Oct-20-09  Everett: Endgame lesson. With the rooks off this is likely a draw, or perhaps advantageous to black. Rooks on is another story entirely...
Oct-20-09  Jim Bartle: Wasn't Immopar a rapid, knockout toournament?
Oct-20-09  Eyal: <Jim Bartle: Wasn't Immopar a rapid, knockout toournament?>

Yes, it was. You mean why the game is mistakenly tagged as "classical"? The state of this database is rather poor in this regard - there are dozens of rapid tournaments or events that are mistakenly tagged like that - e.g., the recent Azerbaijan vs the World event, the final four games of the Kramnik-Topalov match, some of the early Amber tournaments, The Corsica Open, Ciudad de Leon, etc. etc. etc.

Oct-20-09  Jim Bartle: No, I didn't see it marked in any way. I just thought maybe Kasparov's errors were due to some degree to time trouble.
Oct-23-09  Everett: <Jim Bartle> Aagaard claims Kasparov is an outstanding player all around, but sometimes does not have the "feel" for endgames as the top technique players have. *source* Excelling at Chess.
Feb-16-14  rahulbcp: What an endgame!!
Feb-16-14  PJs Studio: I bet Kasparov was discouraged to lose what looks like a simple ending. Short's technique was flawless though.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: It seems that 11. ... Ne5!? is superior to 11. ... Nae8?! simply because of the tactics that mean Black keeps the initiative. That isn't a losing mistake but it avoids a difficult ending.

36. ... Rb2 is a losing move but Kasparov was slowly losing ground. Perhaps not lost.

30.... Rd6 then some tactics prevent White getting the position he got. And the R can get to a6 etc. The position would be=

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Opening Explorer shows that 4...Nbd7! scores much better than 4...Bd7.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: RAPID. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Sicilian McDonnell Attack. Tal Gambit (B21) 1-0 Centralized N
from Some S-upermen Post WWII by fredthebear
Introduction: 2. f4
from Sicilian Grand Prix Attack by Patca63
Sicilian McDonnell Attack. Tal Gambit (B21) 1-0 Centralized N
from yFredthebear's Knights Add Spice III by fredthebear
Sicilian McDonnell Attack. Tal Gambit (B21) 1-0 Centralized N
from B2 Bomber Codes Confuzzle Fredthebear by mneuwirth
kasparov goes berserk
by zzzzzzzzzzzz
Sicilian McDonnell Attack. Tal Gambit (B21) 1-0 Centralized N
from yFredthebear's Knights Add Spice III by trh6upsz
Intro 2.f4 "Starting out: S.Grand Prix Attack" by G. Jones 2008
from Sicilian Closed / Grand Prix Attack by brucemubayiwa
Hinchliffe's favorite games
by Hinchliffe
B vs. N with Rooks
from Endgames by ipap
Introduction: 2. f4
from Sicilian Grand Prix Attack by syuanjiang
by gambitfan
Introduction: 2. f4
from Sicilian Grand Prix Attack by maxchess42
Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack. Tal Gambit
from KASPAROV GAMES GTM by gambitfan
posts for horse
from strategy by totololo

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC