chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Garry Kasparov vs Tigran Petrosian
"Tiger Tiger Burning Bright" (game of the day Dec-05-2017)
Tilburg Interpolis (1981), Tilburg NED, rd 7, Oct-10
Queen's Gambit Accepted: Janowski-Larsen Variation (D25)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 65 times; par: 53 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 4 more Kasparov/Petrosian games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 10 OF 10 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-05-17  Retireborn: William Blake
Dec-05-17  waustad: Wasn't the cat spelled "tyger" there, or am I thinking of something else. I probably saw it first on Ben Casey, thich dates me.
Dec-05-17  Retireborn: I have never heard of Ben Casey. It is not English, is it.
Dec-05-17  nevski: Great pun...it's a quotation of famous AND MARVELLOUS POEM "THE TIGER( William Blake):

Tiger!Tiger! burning bright in the forests of the night, What immortal hand or eye COULD FRAME THY FEARFUL SYMMETRY?

Dec-05-17  waustad: <retire> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0054519...
Dec-05-17  waustad: It was another network's answer to Dr. Kildare. I seem to remember a pretty young woman and rabies, but details from around 55 years ago are not sharp. For that matter it might have been Kildare.
May-24-18  Justin796: Why didn't Garry instantly move his knight to a3 on move 32?
Feb-02-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Clement Fraud: I am very interested in this line of the Queen's Gambit Accepted (where black develops his light squared Bishop outside of the pawn chain). Black's play in this game is so effective that I can't understand why 4... e6 (locking in said Bishop) is regarded as the main line?

Also, would I be correct in thinking that Kasparov missed a win at some point in this game? Many thanks to anyone who knows.

Jan-08-20  AliSawalha: What a brilliant attack
and a wonderful resign
Jun-12-20  C. Auguste Dupin: Petrosian is the Houdini of chess, referring to the engine at his ( Petrosian's) best and to the ultimate escape artist ( Harry Houdini), when slightly off-colour !!
Jan-27-21  Justin796: Fischer was in top form in 1971..but I was still surprised when he beat Petrosian 6-2...more surprised than when Fischer defeated Spassky.
Jan-27-21  Petrosianic: Short matches are more susceptible to extreme scores, just because the person trailing has to take more chances to catch up quickly. They can't bide their time like in a Best of 24.

If you look at all the Candidates Matches from around those times, 5½-2½ is the most typical score.

Jan-27-21  Granny O Doul: The already-by-then archaic spelling "tyger" was likely chosen by Blake to justify the just-as-by-then archaic rhyming of "eye" with "symmetry".
Feb-15-21  carpovius: Very very complicated game...
Mar-23-21  SymphonicKnight: In "The Test of Time" Kasparov does not realize that 33.Qb1! was the best move, and was better even than 33.Na3 which he gives an !. Then 36.Rba3? just drops the Nc4, and it is game over.
Apr-14-21  iron john: what if 20.gf and 21 qe6 ?
Sep-02-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: 35...K-c6! Petrosian defeats Kasparov with the QGA. I always thought taking the pawn was anti-positional, but I guess it depends on the opponent.
Sep-10-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  PawnSac: < iron john: what if 20.gf and 21 qe6 ? >

Interesting name, since you're inquiring about the "iron Tigran".


click for larger view

I don't see a tactical refutation, but apart from a pawn grab, I also don't see where it does white any good.

There is however a positional danger, and it's not the kind of thing a player would ever want to grant Petrosian.

After 20.gf gf 21.Qe6?! black can drive the queen back with ..Nf8! 22.Qe4 f5 [opening the diagonal for the black bishop, while also stamping white's e pawn backward], then he can follow with ..g5! and pry open the g file after which he can play something like ..Rdg8 pinning the white Bg2, weakening the h pawn, and generally expose his king position to a lot of pressure. I don't think I'd want to go that direction with Petrosian, the master of positional maneuvering and long range attack.

The point is.. black does not immediately win back material, but will use attack on the queen to gain tempi opening up the position, which is worth far more than the pawn sacrificed. On the grandmaster level, it would be a foolhardy grab.

Sep-10-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  PawnSac: and btw john, after 20.gf gf 21Qe6?! Nf8 22.Qe4 f5 ..

< 23.Qd3 > seems the best square for the Q to keep the 2nd rank open for a defensive rook lift. Even at that, white's right flank gets very weak.

I would prefer to attack than defend! lol which is probably why Kaspy looked for a better move.

Jun-29-23  DanLanglois: Seems like Kasparov had to let a fine position deteriorate, here.

If I skip over some drama, I can make the point that 31...cxb5 gives this:


click for larger view

White is approaching 'won' status. It's nevertheless true that White loses.

32. Ra2 and Black should play 32...Bb6 here. Even so, it's worrisome. However, Black played 32...Kb7?:


click for larger view

Definitely, White is won. White can play 33. Qb1! White instead played 33. Bb4? White is still much better, though. It's good to play Qb1 'before' Bb4. Why?

33. Qb1! gives this:


click for larger view

The threat, after, shall we say, 33...Qe8, is 34. Rxb5+! Note that 34. Bd5+ is also an idea, equally catastrophic. I am just showing this is possible, though, given that Black has better than 33...Qe8. Black can get that rook off of c8, to create a retreat square for the king. Thus, something like 33...Re8, or 33...Rf8 or 33...Rg8 or 33...Rh8. Not to belabor the point. But White is won anyways.

Jun-29-23  DanLanglois: 34...Ra8 gives this:


click for larger view

White is much better, but blunders here, playing not 35. Ba3, for example, but 35. Qb1?:


click for larger view

Ironic -- I noted that 33. Qb1 was an idea, but the time is passed.

35...Kc6:


click for larger view

White's move isn't great here either. 36. Bxc7 is good for no more than equality, which is heartbreaking enough. Worse, is that it's forced, and Kasparov misses it, playing 36. Rba3?:


click for larger view

36. bxc4:


click for larger view

Now Black is winning.

Jun-29-23  DanLanglois: <SymphonicKnight: In "The Test of Time" Kasparov does not realize that 33.Qb1! was the best move, and was better even than 33.Na3 which he gives an !. Then 36.Rba3? just drops the Nc4, and it is game over.>

So I agree with all of this. Except I think it's interesting, if Kasparov wrote about 33. Na3.

32...Kb7 give this:


click for larger view

33. Na3 isn't very plausible here. The b-pawn is pinned, so the knight doesn't have to move. After 33. Qb1, I was emphasizing that Black must move the c8-rook, to create a retreat square. I can append an engine line:

33.Qb1

Stockfish 15 3.47 (depth 20) Re8 34.Bb4 Qd8 35.Nb2 Rc8 36.Nd3 Bb6 37.Kh2 Rc6 38.Rba3 Nb8 39.Ne5 Qc7 40.Qb3 Rd8 41.Nxc6 Qxc6 42.Rc2 Qd7 43.Ra1 Rc8 44.Bc5 Bxc5 45.dxc5 Qc6 46.Rac1

Jun-29-23  DanLanglois: I see some discussion up the thread about how Petrosian messed up a perfectly defensible position after 29. Nc4:


click for larger view

The game proceeds with 29...Bc7 30. a4 b5 31. axb5 cxb5 when Black is in just a bit of a pickle:


click for larger view

Here White played 32. Ra2, though that's not entirely accurate. 32. Na3 gives this:


click for larger view

Playing Na3 first is better, thus, just for example, 32. Na3 Kb7 would look like this:


click for larger view

Then, 33. Nxb5!

Jun-29-23  DanLanglois: So I think probably Kasparov was remarking on 32. Na3 and not 33. Na3, here:

<SymphonicKnight: In "The Test of Time" Kasparov does not realize that 33.Qb1! was the best move, and was better even than 33.Na3 which he gives an !. Then 36.Rba3? just drops the Nc4, and it is game over.>

Sep-10-23  Mathematicar: https://youtu.be/VPklrc-QFQQ?si=qeB...

Video analysis of the game by Agad.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 10)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 10 OF 10 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC